Research methods:Experiment Types And Designs Flashcards
Lab experiment
Highly controlled, manipulate IV.
Prevents confounding variables + shows cause and effect
Low ecological validity, so not generalisable + ethical issues
- use random selection + standardisation, counterbalancing
Field experiment
Done in everyday environment, manipulate IV, participants unaware that experiment is taking place.
High ecological validity, less likelihood of demand characteristics
Confounding variables, lack of informed consent, Hawthorne effect
- right to withdraw
Natural experiment
Cannot manipulate IV, event being investigated has already happened. everyday environment or participant.
High ecological validity, less likelihood of demand characteristics, often used when manipulating IV is unethical.
Expensive and time consuming, sample bias, lack of informed consent.
- obtain consent
Quasi experiment
Cannot manipulate IV. IV is characteristic of person.
More feasible, allows comparisons between people and can see general trends.
Random assignment can’t be used, leading to confounding variables, less internal validity, less generalisability.
- Use matched pairs design to reduce confounding variables
Repeated measures design
Same participants in each condition of the IV.
Participant variables reduced. Less people needed.
X: Order effect.
- counterbalancing should be used
Independent groups design
Different participants in each condition of the IV.
Avoids effects like fatigue, No order effect, they’re less likely to guess aim.
Lack of control over participant variables, needs more participants.
- Random assignment should be used.
Matched pairs design
Pairs of participants are matched in terms of key variables like age or IQ.
Less participant variables so differences minimised. No order effect.
But not possible to control all participant variables and Time consuming.
- conduct a pilot study to consider key variables that might be important.
aims of pilot studies
the methodology
allows for improvements and modifications
check if valid or reliable
check ambiguities or confusion in info/qs