Research Methodology 4: Stats 2 Flashcards
define prevalence
Prevalence measures the frequency of “cases” in a given population at a designated time
what kind of study measures prevalence
cross sectional
what does a cross sectional study meausure
prevalence and exposure
what ca you calculate from a cross sectional study
point prevalence
pros of cross sectional study
Measure prevalence and thus disease burden in whole population and subpopulations
Can compare prevalence in exposed and non-exposed to risk factors
Quick and inexpensive
Can be used to initially explore a hypothesis, prior to another type of study
cons of cross sectional
Not suitable for rare diseases
Not suitable for diseases of short duration
Cannot separate cause and effect as they are measured at the same time
Cannot measure rate of new cases arising and any changes therein
what do cohort studies measure
A group of people is followed through time, and the onset of a disease/health event measured.
what can you calculate from a cohort study?
incidence
what is the relative risk ?
incidence of disease in exposed/ incidence of disease in non-exposed.
what does the number tell you for relative risk
<1 = less risk than those not exposed
1= same risk
>1 risk in exposed greater than non
pros of a cohort study
Can calculate incidence and relative risk
Can offer some evidence of cause – effect relationship i.e. impact of exposure on disease
Can identify more than one disease related to single exposure (and positive outcomes of exposure/s as relevant)
Good when exposure is rare
Minimises selection and information bias
cons of a cohort study
Potential for losses to follow-up (attrition may differ in exposed versus unexposed / disease versus non, the longer the follow-up the greater the risk of attrition)
Often requires large sample, can take a long time to complete
Less suitable for rare diseases
Expensive
If retrospective, data availability and quality may be poor
what is a case control study
Case–control study groups who differ at outset on disease (condition/outcome) status
pros of a case control
Can offer some evidence of cause – effect relationship i.e. impact of exposure on disease
Can identify multiple exposures (both positive and negative associations, interactions)
Good when disease/outcome is rare
Minimises selection and information bias
Retrospective - cheaper and typically shorter in duration
cons of a case control
Cannot calculate prevalence or incidence
Less suitable for rare exposures
Can be hard to ensure exposure occurred before onset
Retrospective data availability and quality may be poor
Suitable control group may be difficult to find