Research Exam 2 PPT 3 and PPT 4 Flashcards
Descriptive observational study
Designed to describe the distribution between two or more variables without regards of hypothesis or any causal
-Not one clinical/epidemiology study can answer the research question definetly
-Information is collected routinely so less time consuming
-Essential for formulation hypothesis/research question
Case report
Single patient
Case series
Series of patient
Case report and case series
Observational descriptive study design the most basic
-Make link between clinical medicine and epidemiology of the disease
-Chance of observation may open a new line of investigation
Cross sectional studies
Observational descriptive study
-Measures the association of the outcome and the exposure within a population using a specific target time point
-Helpful in assessing the disease burdern and the healthcare needs
-Useful to estimate the prevalence of the disease and the exposure
Observational Analytical study
Designed to perform Hypothesis testing to establish association between the outcome and the exposure
-Is comparison of groups
-Timing sequece
-Observational - Case control studies, cohort studies
-Interventional (Experimental)-Randomize control trials
Cohort
Based on the exposure
It can be prospective or retrospective
Case control
Based on the outcome
Is retrospective
Prospective
Record information before the outcome occur
“Will follow patients for 5 years and recorded the incedence in both groups”
Retrospective
Collect data after exposure occur
An observational study is being conducted in 2023 to investigate whether vasopresssin increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among critically ill patients. The investigators sampled patients who were hospitalized in the ICU from 2020-2022 and obtained two groups: one group who were treated with vasopressin and another group who were not treated with vasopressin. The investigators then recorded whether patients in each group developed VTE during their hospitlization.
Which of the following best describes this study?
A) Retrospective cohort study
B) Nested case-control study
C) Traditional case-control study
D) Prospective cohort study
A) Retrospective cohort study
Selecting cohorts
1-Type of exposure being investigated
2-Frequency of exposure in the population
3-Accesibility of pt
-Pt should be free of the outcome at the start of the study in order to establish temporal relationship between exposure and outcome
-Divided into exposed and unexposed
-Measurement of exposure is based on Variability, Intensity, regularity, duration
-At the start both exposed and unexposed should have the equal chance of developing the outcome-Counterfactual idea
Folow up in cohort studies
Frequency of examination and duration needs to be follow up but is based on the exposure and outcome of interest
-Need to follow up both group on the same time
-Concern on loss-to-follows up usually in long term studies
Cohort studies pros
-Incidence data is available
-Establish temporal relation
-Study mutliple outcomes
-Study rare exposures
Cohort studies cons
-Expensive more time consuming than case control
-Loss to follow up
-Large sample size
-Cannot study rare outcomes
Case control study step 1
Select cases that are the patients that have the disease the outcome based on case definition
Case control study step 2
Select the controls
-Pt that dont have the disease (outcome)
-They are selected from the population that gave rise to the cases
-They are independent of the exposure
Case control study pros
-Less time consuming and inexpensive
-Smaller sample size
-Can study multiple exposule
-Can study rare outcomes
-Efficient for long term
Case control study cons
-Cannot establish relation
-Difficult to identify controls
-Cannot study rare exposures
-Cannot predict incidance rate and prevalence
-Cannot calculate RR and RD only OR
Nested case-control studies
A cohort study need to happend they are exposed then alot of time need to pass and if they have the disease they will be cases and if they dont have the disease they are controls
-The controls are selected from the cohort/target population that gave rise to the cases
-More time consuming cause uses a cohort study first than time needs to pass and get a case control studie
-OR is the measurement
-Disadvantage- more time consuming and less stregnth of evidence than cohort study
Experimental study designs
Study design that is used to compare the benefits of a intervention with treatment or no treatment is used to see the cause and effects
-Is prospectives subjects are place in a study group and then follow up over time
-Randomize controlled trial
-Quasi experimental non random trial