Research and Design Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Extraneous

A

extra variables outside of what is being exained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

confound

A

external variables that are IV that impact the study eg age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

history

A

environmental threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Maturation

A

change in participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

instrumentation

A

the test changes overtime difference in pretest and posttest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

testing

A

pretest influences the postetst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

regression towards mean

A

if given the test more than once scores may decrease or increase.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assignment biased

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reactivity

A

if participants are placed in a context they haven’t experienced or behaviour change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Differential attrition/experimental mortality

A

when you have two groups and people decide to leave one group throwing off the experiment and balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Demand characteristics

A

cues that might indicate the aim of a study to participants( rumors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Experimental bias-

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Compensatory equalisation

A

comparison groups not obtaining the preferred treatment are provided with compensations that make the comparison groups more equal than originally planned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contamination effect/diffusion

A

Participants may share information with each other thus affecting and contaminating/diffusing your experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Selection issues

A

selection hat does not accurately represent the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Representative sample

A

a subset of a population that seeks to accurately reflect the characteristics of the larger group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

similarity of participants

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ecological validity

A

measures how generalizable experimental findings are to the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sampling vs assignment

A

random sampling refers to how you select individuals from the population to participate in your study. Random assignment refers to how you place those participants into groups (such as experimental vs. control).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Carryover effect/differential transfer

A

an effect of being tested one condition on participants’ behaviour in later conditions ( give time between conditions for influence to wear off)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Progressive errors

A

scored affected by experiences gained or lost during the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Practice effect

A

(gain) reading words twice (1st b&W background then with water droplets) increases ones general ability to read words. ( allow practice before introducing research conditions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Fatigue effect(loss)

A

reading words for a long time leads to boredom
Make the research task brief and interesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Fatigue effect(loss)

A

reading words for a long time leads to boredom
Make the research task brief and interesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Counterbalancing

A

general methods to control for testing effects/order effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Quasi-experiments

A

studies that aim to evaluate interventions but that do not use randomization. Similar to randomized trials, quasi-experiments aim to demonstrate causality between an intervention and an outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

true experiment

A

used to describe all studies with at least one independent variable that is experimentally manipulated and with at least one dependent or outcome variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Non-pre-experimental designs

A

include research designs in which an experimenter simply either describes a group or examines relationships between preexisting groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

incomplete counterbalancing

A

You could use the sequence on 6 groups, 12 groups, 18 groups…and so on, as long as you had a multiple of six (so that each sequence is run the same number of times). If you don’t have enough participants to do this (let’s say you had 17 groups instead of 18), it’s called partial counterbalancing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

complete counterbalancing

A

a process of arranging a series of experimental conditions or treatments in such a way that every possible sequence of conditions is given at least once during the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

priming -

A
  • activation of knowledge structures (e.g. traits) due to a situational
    context
  • occurs when an individual’s exposure to a certain stimulus influences his or her response to a subsequent stimulus, without any awareness of the connection.
32
Q

random groups design

A

between groups designs where participants are placed in groups via random allocation

33
Q

balancing

A

having equity of participants across conditions

34
Q

simple randomisation

A

uses a single sequence to assign participants (e.g., flip a coin)

35
Q

restricted random assignment

A

randomisation was done so that predetermined characteristics (e.g., sex, academic major) in each condition of the independent variable

36
Q

Matched Group Designs

A

an independent measures design where comparable testing
groups are created

37
Q

Internal consistency reliability

A

measure of reliability used to evaluate the degree to which different test items that probe the same construct produce similar results.

38
Q

Test-retest reliability

A

measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals.

39
Q

Parallel forms reliability

A

is assessed by sequentially administering both test forms to the same sample of respondents.

40
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

a measure of consistency used to evaluate the extent to which different judges agree in their assessment decisions.

41
Q

Content validity

A

appropriate content, measure content based on theory

42
Q

Face validity

A

does the test appear to test what its meant to test, face value

43
Q

Construct validity

A

measure what its suppose to, does the test relate to underlying theoretical concepts

44
Q

criterion validity

A

relationship to other measures

45
Q

concurrent/convergent validity

A

does the test relate to a similar test or give similar scores

46
Q

Predictive Validity

A

predicts significant differences among groups, predicts later performance on the related criterion

47
Q

Internal validity

A
48
Q

Nonequivalent groups design

A

the researcher chooses existing groups that appear similar, but where only one of the groups experiences the treatment.

49
Q

Regression discontinuity

A
  • Many potential treatments that researchers wish to study are designed around an essentially arbitrary cutoff, where those above the threshold receive the treatment and those below it do not.
  • all potentially relevant variables besides the treatment variable and outcome variable be continuous at the point where the treatment and outcome discontinuities occur.
50
Q

Natural experiments

A

In both laboratory and field experiments, researchers normally control which group the subjects are assigned to. In a natural experiment, an external event or situation (“nature”) results in the random or random-like assignment of subjects to the treatment group.

51
Q

Time series designs

A

subcategory of longitudinal research designs which feature analyses on “large series of observations made on the same variable consecutively over time”.

52
Q

Hawthorne effect

A

modification of behavior by study participants in response to their knowledge that they are being observed or singled out for special treatment.

53
Q

A matched pairs design

A

a type of experimental design wherein study participants are matched based on key variables, or shared characteristics, relevant to the topic of the study. Then, one member of each pair is placed into the control group while the other is placed in the experimental group

54
Q

Interrupted Time-Series Design

A

if the intervention is not manipulated by the researcher but rather occurs naturally

55
Q

POSTTEST-ONLY NONEQUIVALENT GROUPS DESIGN

A

participants in one group are exposed to a treatment, a nonequivalent group is not exposed to the treatment, and then the two groups are compared.

56
Q

PRETEST-POSTTEST NONEQUIVALENT GROUPS DESIGN

A

there is a treatment group that is given a pretest, receives a treatment, and then is given a posttest. But at the same time there is a nonequivalent control group that is given a pretest, does not receive the treatment, and then is given a posttest.

57
Q

PRETEST-POSTTEST DESIGN WITH SWITCHING REPLICATION

A

nonequivalent groups are administered a pretest of the dependent variable, then one group receives a treatment while a nonequivalent control group does not receive a treatment, the dependent variable is assessed again, and then the treatment is added to the control group, and finally the dependent variable is assessed one last time.

58
Q

SWITCHING REPLICATION WITH TREATMENT REMOVAL DESIGN

A

the treatment is removed from the first group when it is added to the second group.

59
Q

The Latin Square Design

A

It assumes that one can characterize treatments, whether intended or otherwise, as belonging clearly to separate sets. These categories are arranged into two sets of rows.

60
Q

Block design

A

a type of research study in which participants are divided into relatively homogeneous subsets (blocks) from which they are assigned to the experimental or treatment conditions

61
Q

Order effects

A

refer to differences in research participants’ responses that result from the order (e.g., first, second, third) in which the experimental materials are presented to them.

62
Q

Mixed Factorial Design

A

It is named the ‘Mixed Factorial Design’ because it has at least one Within Subject variable and one Between Subject variable

63
Q

main effect

A

effect one independent variable has on the dependent variable without taking other independent variables into account.

64
Q

Interaction effect

A

effect one independent variable has on another independent variable, and how that effect translates to the dependent variable.

65
Q

Complex designs

A

one in which more than one variable is manipulated at the same time.

66
Q

Directional Hypothesis:

A

A hypothesis that is built upon a certain directional relationship between two variables and constructed upon an already existing theory, is called a directional hypothesis. To understand more about what is directional hypothesis here is an example, Girls perform better than boys (‘better than’ shows the direction predicted

67
Q

one tailed test

A

statistical test in which the critical area of a distribution is one-sided so that it is either greater than or less than a certain value, but not both

68
Q

two-tailed test

A

test both if the mean is significantly greater than x and if the mean significantly less than x.

69
Q

Non-directional Hypothesis:

A
  • It involves an open-ended non-directional hypothesis that predicts that the independent variable will influence the dependent variable; however, the nature or direction of a relationship between two subject variables is not defined or clear.
  • There will be NO difference between the number of cold symptoms experienced in the following week after exposure to a virus for those participants who have been sleep deprived for 24 hours compared with those who have not been sleep deprived for 24 hours.
70
Q

correlational research

A

a correlation is a computed value that has 2 elements

71
Q

observational research design

A

a descriptive research strategy used when you want to describe behaviour

72
Q

Participant observation

A

when the observer becomes a part of the group that is being studied. This type of observation allows the observer to get a closer look at the group and their behaviour

73
Q

Non-participant observation

A

when the observer remains outside the group and simply watches their behaviour.

74
Q

Single Case research design

A

Applies experimental control to study a single ( or few) subjects
- can provide a viable alternative to large group studies such as randomized clinical trials. Single case studies involve repeated measures, and manipulation of and independent variable.

75
Q

Changing criterion design

A

Series of treatment periods with different goals set for each period
- a researcher studying the effectiveness of money in reducing caffeine consumption may use a changing-criterion design with four treatment phases, each gradually decreasing the amount below which participants must maintain their caffeine intake.