reliability and validity Flashcards
what is validity
the extent to which results of a research are legitimate
3 ways to assess validity
face validity
concurrent validity
predictive validity
what is face validity (assessing validity) (2)
-the measure is scrutinised to see whether it appears to measure what its supposed to
-can be assessed by the researcher or another expert
what is concurrent validity (assessing validity )(2)
-extent to which a psychological measure compares with an existing measure
-results obtained should match/be similar to the results of the existing measure
what is predictive validity (assessing validity)
-how well a test can predict future events/behaviours
eg. how childhood attachment measured using the strange situation is able to predict how the child will grow up to behave in adulthood
what is internal validity and what is it influenced by
-whether the outcomes are due to only manipulation of the IV
-influenced by:
extraneous + confounding variables
participant variables+demand characteristics
investigator bias
what is external validity and what are the 3 types
extent to which findings can be generalised to other settings, populations and times
-ecological validity, temporal validity, population validity
what is ecological validity
generalisability to other situations and settings
what is temporal validity
generalisability to other historical times and eras
what is population validity
generalisability to different populations (ages, genders, cultures)
how to improve validity in qualitative methods (2)
-use of triangulation (using a number of different sources of evidence)
-researcher demonstrates the interpretative validity of conclusions- the extent to which the researchers interpretations of events matches those of the p’s eg. include direct quotes from p’s
how to improve validity in questionnaires (2)
-use lie scale to assess consistency of responses and control effects of social desirability bias
-assure p’s that all data remains anonymous
how to improve validity in experimental research (3 different ways)
-use a control group- easier to assess if changes in the DV were due to IV
-use standardised procedures to minimise impact of participant reactivity+investigator effects on validity of results
-single blind- reduces demand characteristics. Double blind- reduces demand characteristics and investigator effects
how to improve validity in ovbservations (2)
-cover observations- behaviour more likely to be authentic- higher ecological validity
-behavioural categories shouldnt be broad, ambiguous and overlapping so they dont affect validity of results
what is reliability
reliability=consistency of results over time