Relationships: Duck's Phase Model Flashcards
What were Duck’s 3 main reasons as to why relationships break up
- pre-existing doom
- mechanical failure
- sudden death
What is pre-existing doom
- incompatibility and failure are fairly much guaranteed from the start of the relationship.
What is mechanical failure
- two compatible, well meaning people grow apart and find that they cannot live together any longer.
What is sudden death
- discovery of infidelity or the occurrence of a traumatic incident (such as a huge argument) leads to immediate ending of a relationship.
What were Duck’s other factors which contribute to relationship dissolution
- Predisposing personal factors – individuals’ bad habits.
- Participating factors – love rivals, working hours, lack of
relationship direction. - Lack of skills – sexually inexperienced.
- Lack of motivation – perceived inequality.
- Lack of maintenance – spending too much time apart.
What did Duck say about the partner’s behaviour after the end of a relationship
- each partner creates a “breakup story” which leaves them in a good light, so that they can ensure gaining a future partner.
- Therefore, romantic relationships are ended publicly in a way that signifies an individual’s freedom from their former partner and their availability.
What are the different phases
- Intra-psychic phase
- Dyadic phase
- Social phase
- grave-dressing phase
What is the intra-psychic phase (I can’t stand this)
- Threshold: ‘I can’t stand this anymore’, indicating a determination that something has to change.
- Partner assesses adequacy of partner’s role performance; broods on dissatisfaction, centering mostly on their partner’s shortcomings.
- Make plans: face ‘express/repress dilemma’ – whether you should express your dissatisfaction or keep it to yourself.
What is the dyadic phase ‘I would be justified in withdrawing’
- Face up to ‘confrontation/avoidance dilemma’ CONFRONT partner.
- Negotiation through ‘our relationship’ talks; Dissatisfaction aired – anger resentment etc.
- Attempt repair and reconciliation?
- Assess joint costs of withdrawal or reduced intimacy.
What is the social phase ‘I mean it’
- Negotiate post-discussion state with partner.
- Initiate gossip/discussion in social networks; seek support.
- Some friends will hasten the end of the relationship whilst others may try to help and repair it.
- Point of no return –> the break-up takes on a momentum driven by social forces
What is the grave-dressing phase ‘it’s now inevitable’
- Perform ‘getting over it’ activities.
- create a personal story you can live with, which may differ from the public one - tidy up memories.
- Publicly distribute own version of break-up; gossip plays an important role and crucial that each partner tries to retain some ‘social credit’
- ‘Time to update the Facebook, insta….’
List the evaluations for Duck’s Phase model
Positive:
- useful real-life applications
Negative:
- incomplete model -> rectified
- methodological issues
- description rather than explanation
- cultural bias
(+) Explain how the phase model has useful real-life applications
- The model helps us identify and understand the stages of relationship breakdown and offers various ways to reverse the breakdown.
- Duck (1994) recommends that people in the intra-psychic phase could be encouraged to focus their brooding on positive aspects of their partner.
(-) explain how the phase model is incomplete/oversimplified (Rollie and Duck)
- Rollie and Duck (2006) stated that the model is oversimplified.
- Added the resurrection phase -> Ex partners turn attention to future relationships using the exp gained from their recently-ended one.
- Rollie and Duck stated that progression from one phase to the next is not inevitable - you can return to an earlier phase.
- Processes that occur rather than linear movement.
(-) explain the methodological issues with the phase model
- Most of the research is retrospective – after a relationship has ended.
- What is recalled may not be accurate or reliable.
- Early stages of breakdown tends to be distorted or ignored altogether.