Forensics: Psychodynamic theory Flashcards
Summarise Blackburn’s theory
- If the superego is somehow deficient or inadequate then criminal behaviour is inevitable because the id is given ‘free reign’ -> 3 explanations:
- the weak superego
- the deviant superego
- the over-harsh superego
explain the weak superego (Blackburn)
- if the same-sex parent is absent during the phallic stage there is no identification so the child cannot internalise a fully-formed superego.
-> making immoral / criminal behaviour likely.
Explain the deviant superego (Blackburn)
- if the superego the child internalises has immoral or deviant values this would lead to offending behaviour e.g. influence of criminal parents.
Explain the over-harsh superego
- An excessively harsh or punitive super-ego makes the individual crippled by guilt or anxiety. They may then commit criminal acts – to satisfy the superego’s need for punishment.
Explain how the maternal deprivation theory is an explanation for offending (Bowlby, maternal bond)
- Failure to establish maternal bond in first few years.
- leads to damaging and irreversible consequences.
- Affectionless psychopathy: lack of guilt, empathy and feelings for others – can result in engaging in delinquency.
-> Bowlby’s study on 44 thieves
Explain Englander’s theory on displacement
- If offenders cannot control their aggression, which comes from their instinctive id, the aggression might spill out of their unconscious, resulting in violent and offending behaviour.
Explain how defence mechanisms work
- these are used by the unconscious mind to reduce anxiety:
- Displacement: focus of anger shifted from actual target to neutral target.
- Denial: unwanted reality of threatening event is ignored and blocked from conscious awareness.
- Repression: involves the ego stopping unwanted and possibly painful thoughts from being conscious.
List the evaluations for the psychodynamic approach for offending
Positive:
- considers emotion
Negative:
- gender bias
- Unconscious concepts (lacks empiricism)
- Correlation not causation
(+) explain how the psychodynamic approach considers emotions
- Unlike most of the other approaches, the psychodynamic approach deals with the role of emotional factors.
- It explains how anxiety and / or how feelings of rejection may contribute to offending behaviour.
- It also recognises the role of biological influences and early childhood experiences in moulding adult personality.
(-) explain how the psychodynamic approach has gender bias (Hoffman)
- Alpha bias in Freud’s research – women have lower status.
- argued women do not identify with same-sex parent as much as boys do.
-> Superego is not fully realised as well as their sense of morality - If Freud’s views were correct, there should be more female criminals than men because of a weak super-ego -> however it is the other way around.
- Hoffman found little difference in terms of gender for resistance to temptation.
(-) explain how the psychodynamic approach uses unconscious concepts (lacks falsifiability -> lacks empiricism)
- unconscious concepts - lack of falsifiability and are not open to empirical testing.
- Psychodynamic explanations are therefore regarded as ‘pseudoscientific’ – fake science.
(-) explain how research supporting the psychodynamic approach is correlational and does not explain causation (Lewis)
- Lewis (1954) analysed data drawn from interviews with 500 young people.
- Found maternal deprivation was a poor predictor of future offending and the ability to form close relationships in adolescence.
-> There could be alternative explanations such as genetics or other social influences.