Forensics: Behaviour modification in custody (prison) Flashcards
What is Behaviour modification in custody
- one of the methods used in rehabilitation of prisoners.
- behaviourist approach -> operant conditioning.
- Positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and punishment are used to increase desired behaviours and decrease undesired behaviours.
What is the token economy
- Based on operant conditioning, token economy involves reinforcing desirable behaviour with a token that can be exchanged for some kind of reward.
- Prisoners are given a token each time they perform a desirable behaviour.
-> That behaviour is then associated with that reward (secondary reinforcer). - It would also be emphasised that undesirable behaviour would result in loss of tokens or privileges.
What is the Conjugal visit (a reward example of token economy) (D’Alessio)
- scheduled visit in which an inmate of a prison is permitted to spend several hours or days in private with a visitor, usually their legal spouse.
-> The parties may engage in sexual activity.
-> Legal in 6 states in America.
Supporting evidence:
- D’Alessio -> may be useful in reducing sexual and physical violence in prisons.
(-) Explain Reppucci and Saunders’s research into behaviour modification programmes (hard to implement)
- Reppucci and Saunders found that although the behaviour management programmes should be easy to run, in real life they are not.
- This was due to institutional pressures, limited resources, and inconsistency with staff.
(+) explain Hobbs and Holt’s research into behaviour modification programmes (short term effectiveness)
- Found the introduction of a behaviour modification programme in three young offenders institutions reduced the amount of undesirable behaviour when compared with an institution that had no such programme (significant difference).
- This demonstrates the short-term benefits that behaviour modification can have.
List the evaluations of behaviour modification programmes
Positive:
- short-term effectiveness (Hobbs and Holt’s)
Negative:
- Hard to implement (Reppucci and Sander’s)
- low rehab value (Blackburn)
- low value for token value (Cohen and Filipczak)
(-) explain how behaviour modification lacks rehab value (Blackburn)
- Token economies, according to Blackburn, “have little rehabilitative value” – any positive changes may quickly be lost when offenders are released.
- Progress is unlikely to be assured upon release since law-abiding behaviour is not rewarded/reinforced on the outside.
- Rewards the offender receives from breaking the law (such as group status) may be more powerful than abiding by the token economy.
(-) explain how the token economy lacks effectiveness (Cohen and Filipczak)
- Cohen and Filipczak:
- Compared a control group and token economy group within a prison. The token economy group showed more desirable behaviour than the control groups.
- After 2 years, the token economy group were less likely to have reoffended.
- However, after 3 years, rates of recidivism went back to reflecting national statistics.