Relationships Flashcards
Sexual selection
Drives partner preferences
- Males & females choose partners to maximise reproductive success
- Individuals with traits that maximise reproductive success are more likely to survive & pass on their genes
Anisogamy
The difference between how often men and women are able to reproduce. Leads;
- Men to use intra-sexual selection
- Women to use inter-sexual selection
Intra-sexual selection
Members of one sex (Typically male) compete for access to the other sex. This leads to male-female dimorphism
Dimorphism
Accentuation of secondary sexual characteristics in those with greater reproductive fitness
Anisogamy — Suggestion for men
The best evolutionary strategy is to have as many partners as possible
- Males may engage in mate guarding to prevent cuckoldry (Men are fearful of having to raise another mans child)
Inter-sexual selection
Members from one sex (usually female) choose from available prospective mates (Usually males) according to attractiveness
Anisogamy — Suggestions for women
The best evolutionary strategy is to be selective when choosing a partner
- Tend to seek males that display the characteristics of physical health, high status and resources
Therefore they can provide and protect
Strengths of the evolutionary explanation for partner preferences
- Buss conducted a survey of 10,000 adults in 33 countries and found that females value resource based characteristics, while men valued good looks and younger partners
- Clark and Hatfield conducted a study where male and female students approached fellow students (of the opposite sex) and asked them to go to bed with them. 75% of men accepted, while 0% of women did, however 50% agreed to a date
Weaknesses of the evolutionary explanation for partner preferences
- Determinsic & suggest we have little free will in choosing our partners
- Makes little attempt to explain other types of relationships eg homosexual, and cultural variations exist eg arranged marriage
- Approach is socially sensitive as it promotes traditionally sexist views regarding what is ‘natural’ and what is desired. Also ignores the existence of contraception
Self- disclosure
Revealing personal information (Thoughts, feelings, experiences) about yourself to another person
- Central concept in social penetration theory (Altman and Taylor)
- This proposes that gradually revealing emotions & experiences to another person increases trust & attraction
What does self disclosure look like at the beginning of a relationship, and after some time within the relationship?
Beginning: People only disclose superficial things
As time passes this deepens, as people begin to reveal more intimate details
Self-disclosing too quickly can reduce attraction
Reciprocal self disclosure
People expect the same level of self disclosure as given
Strengths of self disclosure
- Altman and Taylor found that self disclosure on the first date is inappropriate & the person is seen as maladjusted and not likeable
- Kito supported that self disclosure is present across cultures. Kito found that the level of self disclosure was high for both Japanese and American hetero couples
Weaknesses of self disclosure
- Sprecher found research evidence that the level of self disclosure received is the best predication of likening and loving, rather than the amount of self disclosure given — This goes against reciprocal self disclosure
- It seems unlikely that attraction is based off self disclosure alone. Self disclosure might be an important element but other factors, such as physical attraction, similarity of attitudes, and complementarity of needs might also be needed to increase attraction
Physical attractiveness
Men place a great deal of importance on physical attractiveness when choosing both a long and short term female partner
Women place more emphasis on physical attractiveness in the short term than the long term
Physical attractiveness varies across cultures & time
Halo effect
When the general impression of a person is incorrectly formed from one characteristic alone (eg physical attractiveness). Physically attractive people are seen as more sociable, optimistic and successful. People tend to behave positively towards physically attractive people and this creates a self fulfilling prophecy wherein the person behaves more positively due to the attention
Strength of the halo effect
Palmer and Peterson (2012) found that physically attractive people were rated as more politically knowledgable than unattractive people. The halo effect was so powerful it was found to persist even when the pps found out the attractive person had no knowledge of politics
Weaknesses of the halo effect
Towhey (1979) asked male and female pps to rate how much they liked an individual based on a photograph. Participants. Also completed a MACHO scale (measure sexist attitudes/behaviours). Pps who scored high on the MACHO scale were more influenced by physical attractiveness
The matching hypothesis
Most people would prefer to form a relationship with the most attractive person possible, but due to fear of rejection will instead pursue someone of equal attractiveness to them
Strengths of the matching hypothesis
Fangold (1988) carried out a meta analysis of 17 studies using real life couples. He established a strong positive correlation between the partners rating of physical attractiveness as predicted by the matching hypothesis
Weaknesses of the matching hypothesis
- Walter (1966) invited first year students to attend a dance, they were randomly matched to their partners, but a panel secretly judged their attractiveness. Students were asked if they found their partner attractive and if they would like to go on a second date with them. Students expressed higher appreciation if their partner was attractive, regardless to their own attractiveness
- Physically attractive people can form a relationship with an unattractive person due to a rebalance of traits, whereby the less attractive person makes up for this with traits such as money, personality or status. This is called complex matching whereby a very attractive person forms a relationship with an unattractive person
Filter theory
Kerchoff and David (1962) - People use filtering to reduce the field of available partners to desirable partners
Social demography -> Similarity in attitude -> Complementarity of needs
Strengths of filter theory
- Taylor found that 85% of Americans who got married in 2008 married someone from their own ethnic group, supporting the social demography aspect of filter theory
- Hoyle found that perceived attitude similarity can predict attraction more accurately than actual attitude similarity
Weaknesses of filter theory
- Levinger conducted a study of 330 couples & found no evidence that similarity of attitudes / Complementarity of needs was important when looking at how permanent the relationship was
- Anderson found in his longitudinal study of cohabiting partners that they became more similar over time, increasing attraction (emotional convergence)