Biopsychology: L6-9 Flashcards

1
Q

Cerebrum

A
  • Central hemisphere, in the forebrain
  • Split into hemispheres
    Four lobes; Frontal (Thought and speech production), Temporal (Cognitive skills), Parietal (Sensory information) and occipital (Image processing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Diencephalon

A
  • In the forebrain, just inside the cerebrum
  • Responsible for sensory function, food intake and the body’s sleep cycle
    Sections:
  • Thalamus
  • Hypothalamus
  • Epithalamus
  • Subthalamus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cerebellum

A
  • Hindbrain, bellow the cerebrum & attached to the brain stem
  • Controls motor function, balance and ability to interpret sensory information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brain stem

A
  • Midbrain and hindbrain
  • Governs blood pressure, some reflexes, ‘fight or flight’, breathing and heartbeat
  • Motor and sensory neuron travel through the brain stem, passing between the brain and spinal cord
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Somatosensory cortex

A
  • Receives sensory information from receptors in the skin
  • Located in the parietal lobe
  • Faces and hand take up over half the space
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Motor cortex

A
  • Generation of voluntary movement
  • Within the frontal lobe
  • Found on both sides of the brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Visual centre

A
  • Found in the occipital lobe
  • Responsible for sight
  • Damage can lead to prosopagnosia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Auditory centre

A
  • Found in the temporal lobes in both hemispheres
  • Responsible for hearing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Broca’s area

A
  • Found in the frontal lobe
  • Important for speech production
  • Damage can lead to Brocas aphasia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wernickes area

A
  • Left temporal lobe
  • Involved in understanding language
  • Damage leads to Wernickes aphasia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strengths of localisation of function

A

Brain scan evidence - Peterson et al used brain scans to show how Wernickes area was active during listening tasks & Broca’s area was active during a reading task, suggesting that language is localised in these areas — Further increases validity due to scientific evidence

Neurosurgical evidence - Dougherty et al found that 44 OCD patients who had undergone brain surgery, after 32 weeks it was found that 1/3 of patients had recovered from the symptoms of OCD, while 14% had some recovery — Mental disorders are localised

Phineas Gage - Suffered brain damage where he lost his temporal lobe, suffered a complete change in personality — Case studies support localisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weaknesses of localisation of function

A

Reductionist - Lashley found that higher cognitive functions (eg learning) are not localised. Lashley removed areas of the cortex (10-50%) in rats brains and found that no area was more important in terms of a rats ability to run the maze

Plasticity - When the brain is damaged or a function is lost, the brain reorganises itself to compensate for lost function — Suggests that the brain can compensate for damage to brain localisation

Individual differences - Harasty et al found gender differences in the size of the Broca’s and Wernickes areas, with women’s being proportionally larger. This may be due to women’s greater use of language — Suggests that localisation of function may not be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Brain lateralisation

A

The two halves of the brain are not exactly identical, the two hemispheres have functional specialisations eg the left side is dominant for language

The brain is contralateral - The left hemisphere deals with the right side of the body. Includes taste, sight and smell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Narumoto et al & Clarke et al

A

Studies that support brain localisation - Narumoto found the right hemisphere is dominant for emotion, Clarke suggested the right hemisphere deals with spatial recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strengths of lateralisation

A
  • Rogers et al: brain lateralisation is linked with an enhanced ability to preform two tasks simultaneously -> Lateralisation increases efficiency in cognitive tasks that demand simultaneous but difference use of both hemispheres
  • Tonnessen et al: found a small but significant relationship between handedness and immune disorders suggesting a link between lateralisation and the development of the immune system -> Study left handedness (right brain dominance), as they tend to suffer higher rates of allergies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weaknesses of lateralisation

A
  • Szaflarski et al: found that language became more lateralised to the left hemisphere, up until the age of 25 but decreased after that -> Suggests that lateralisation changes over time and is only relevant up to a certain age
  • Brain plasticity: Lateralisation has shown that the other hemisphere can take over the job of both hemispheres, suggesting that brain plasticity can overcome potential limitations associated with lateralisation
17
Q

Split brain research

A

Studies lateralisation as it shows what is dominant in each hemisphere

  • Patients with epilepsy have their corpus callosum cut, preventing communication between hemispheres, this allows studies to be conducted on which hemisphere is most dominant
18
Q

Sperry and Gazzaniga

A

Researchers would use the divided field procedure to send visual information to just one hemisphere at a time. There were 3 tasks;

  • See: A picture was presented to the left or right & the pps had to describe what they saw
  • Tactile: An object was placed in one hand & pps had to describe what they felt
  • Drawing: Pps were presented with a picture on one side & draw what they saw
19
Q

Findings of Sperry and Gazzaniga

A

See: Picture on the RVF could be described verbally (Left hemisphere = language production). While they often could not describe what was present on the LVF

Tactile: Objects in the RH could described or identified (left hemisphere) however in the LH (right hemisphere) it could only be identified, not described

Drawing: Pictures presented to the RVF/LVF -> The LHs drawing was clearer than the RH (Right hemisphere is better at visual motor tasks), and dominant hand had no effect

20
Q

Turk et al

A

Conducted a study on JW (who had split brain surgery). The stimuli were morphed faces;
- One was JWs, the other a familiar researchers
They ranged from 100% one, to a mix of both -> used the divided field procedure

Right hemisphere is better at facial processing, but left hemisphere is important in self recognition

21
Q

Strengths of split brain research

A
  • Research: For example, Sperry and Gazzanigas research can be used to show that hemispheric lateralisation exists -> Eg the right hemisphere is responsible for visual spatial programming and facial recognition
22
Q

Weaknesses of split brain research

A
  • Very few patients -> only 10-15 have been subjected to extensive study (small sampling size)
  • Extremely varied group -> ranges in age, gender and handedness (Unclear cause and effect)
  • The operations were not always the same -> some only had part of the corpus callosum cut

These all lead to issues with generalisability

23
Q

Plasticity

A

The ability of the brain to adapt synapses, pathways, and structures in light of various experiences.

24
Q

Plasticity in the newborn brain

A

By the end of the first year, the brain has more neurons and more synapses than it will have when it becomes fully mature
- There are more new stimuli & more processing required

If a baby has a hemispherectomy & the hemisphere is removed soon after birth then the adult shows few, if any cognitive/behavioural impairments (Villablanca and Hovda)

25
Q

Plasticity as a result of life experiences

A

Boyke et al: found evidence of plasticity in a group of 60 year olds who were taught a new skill (juggling) had an increase of grey matter in the visual cortex -> when practice stopped, the changes were reversed

26
Q

Plasticity and meditation

A

Davidson et al: compared 8 practitioners of Tibetan meditation & 10 volunteers (control group) and asked both to meditate. They found monks had a much greater increase in gamma waves -> concluded that meditation may produce permanent changes

27
Q

Strengths of plasticity

A
  • Animal studies: Kempermann et al found an increase in new neurons for rats in complex environments vs rats in ordinary cages. Also, the rats in complex environments had an increase i neurons in the hippocampus -> Evidentiary support for plasticity
  • Human studies: Maguire et al studied London taxi drivers using MRI scanners to calculate the amount of grey matter in the brain compared to a set amount of pps. The front part of the hippocampus was larger & correlated how long they spent driving taxis -> Changes as a result of spatial experiences
28
Q

Weaknesses of plasticity

A
  • Negative plasticity: Medina et al found evidence that the brains adaptations to prolonged drug use leads to poorer cognitive functioning in later life & increase in risk of dementia -> Plasticity is not always beneficial & and may have negative behavioural consequences
  • Generalisation: Animal species are completely different from humans eg rats & kittens are mobile from birth so there brain development would be much faster than humans -> Should be cautious when applying animal results to humans
  • Ethics: Studies carried on animals can be questionable eg in Blakemore and Mitchells study involved exposing kittens to only vertical stripes. As the kittens were denied a normal environment then ethically the study was not correct -> Cannot be applied to humans as they are not denied a normal environment
29
Q

Common types of brain trauma

A
  • Physical trauma eg blows & missile wounds
  • Cerebral haemorrhage eg stroke - when a blood vessel in the brain bursts, brain areas that are supplied begin to die & the pressure can cause damage
  • Cerebral ischaemia eg stroke - When a blood vessel is blocked by a clot (Thrombosis) or the thickening of the blood vessel due to fatty deposits (arteriosclerosis) brain areas that are supplied begin to die
  • Viral or bacterial infections eg meningitis - Destroys brain tissue
30
Q

What can brain injuries do?

A

Causes;
- Movement paralysis
- Aphasia
- Amnesia
- Perception difficulties

As blood supply is often lateralised, then so is the damage causing effects of trauma to be one sided

31
Q

Doidge 2007

A

The brain is able to retire and reorganise itself by forming new synaptic connections close to the area of damage secondary neural pathways that would not typically be used to carry out specific functions are activated/ unmasked to enable continued functioning

32
Q

Axonal sprouting

A

The growth of new nerve endings which connect with other unmanaged nerve cells to form new neuronal pathways

33
Q

Denervation supersensitivity

A

Axons that do a similar role become aroused to a higher level to compensate for the ones that have been lost. However this can cause over sensitivity to messages such as pain

34
Q

Recruitment of homologous areas

A

Opposite areas of the brain can be used to preform specific tasks eg if the Broca’s area was damaged then the equivalent right side may begin to carry out that function — after a period of time it may shift back to the left

35
Q

Neuronal unmasking

A

Wall (1977) first identified dormant synapses in the brain. This means synaptic connections exist but the functions are blocked. Increasing the rate of input to these synapses (happens when areas of the brain are damaged) can unmask them, opening connections to dormant areas of the brain creating a lateral spread of activation which allows for the development of new structures

36
Q

Danelli et al (2013)

A

EB had an operation at 2.5 years where a large tumour was removed from his left hemisphere. After EB lost all his linguistic abilities
- He underwent intensive rehab and by age 5 his language abilities had started to improve
- At age 8 he no longer had any difficulties

When tested against controls at 7, they found his right hemisphere had compensated for the loss of the left hemisphere — Supports the idea of recruitment of homologous areas

37
Q

Strengths of functional recovery

A
  • Practical application: Contributed to the field of neurorehabilitation, although recovery can happen naturally, it tends to slow after a few weeks. Physical therapy can improve recovery to aid cognitive/motor deficits — Functional recovery is natural but aid increases quality of recovery
  • Research: Schneider et al (2014) found that patients with the equivalent of a college education are 7x more likely to be disability free one year after a moderate to severe brain trauma compared to those who did not finish high school. Researchers concluded this was due to a cognitive reserve that factors in neural adaptation

Ratcliffe et al (2007) examined 325 patients with brain trauma to assess their level of response for cognitive skills to rehabilitation. It was found that women preform significantly better than men on tests of attention/working memory and language whereas men outperformed females in visual analytical tasks

38
Q

Weaknesses of functional recovery

A
  • Age differences: Huttenocher et al concluded that beyond childhood, the only option for recovery is develop compensatory behavioural strategies to work around deficits. Despite indications for adult plasticity Elbert et al concluded that the capacity for neural reorganisation is greater in children.