Attachments: L1-4 Flashcards
Reciprocity
An interaction where one person responds and elicits a response
Reciprocity - Studies
Feldman and Eidelman: Mothers typically pick up and respond to infant alertness around 2/3rd of the time
Brazelton: Basic rhythm is an important precursor to later communications
Interactional synchrony
‘The temporal coordination of micro level social behaviour’
-> Interaction between caregiver and infant is a reflection
Meltzoff and Moore
- Controlled observation with independent observers on Interactional synchrony
- Found that infants as young as 2-3 weeks old imitated specific facial expressions
- Suggests that synchrony is innate
Piaget
Argues against Meltzoff and Moore
- Claims their findings were a pseudo imitation and that true imitation occurs after a year old
Evaluation of caregiver infant interactions through reciprocity and interactional synchrony
Failure to replicate - other studies, such as Koepke et al failed to replicate Meltzoff and Moores findings
Individual differences - Isabella et al found there was variations in interactional synchrony, those with stronger attachments showed greater synchrony
Schaffer and Emerson - Procedure
60 babies (6-23 weeks) from skilled working class families in Glasgow were visited in their homes every 4 weeks for the first year, then again at 18 months.
A mix of observations (overt) and interviews were conducted. The mother also kept a diary of the infants response to 7 types of separation, such as being left alone in a room, or left with other people. The mother rated the intensity of any protest on a four point scale, and whom it was directed at.
This measured two specific attachment patterns:
- separation anxiety (distress when separated from caregiver)
- stranger anxiety (distress when approached by someone unfamiliar)
Schaffer and Emerson - Findings
65% = First primary attachment was the mother
3% = attached to the father
27% = jointly attached
By 18 months, 75% formed an attachment to the father also
Stage one : pre-attachment phase
0-6 weeks (asocial stage) = behaves similarly with objects & humans
6 weeks - 3 months = preference towards humans (indicated by smiling)
Stage 2: indiscriminate attachments
3 - 6/7 months = begin to show preference to familiar faces, but do not show preference to one particular adult
Stage 3: specific/discriminate attachments
7/8 months = begin to show separation/stranger anxiety & form a primary attachment
Stage four: multiple attachments
9 months on = can form multiple attachments (secondary attachments). Schaffer and Emerson found that within one month of becoming first attached 30% of infants formed a secondary attachment
Strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s study
Good external validity = carried out in the families own home & most observations were done by parents, allowing the findings to be applicable to daily life
No ethical issues = consent was obtained & there was no harm or deception involved
Longitudinal design = PPS were followed up & observed regularly allowing far better internal validity as there would be less confounding variables such as individual differences
Weaknesses of Schaffer and Emerson’s study
Methodological issues = as it was self report, social desirability bias may have been present as the mothers would want to be viewed as having a better relationship with their infant
Conflicting evidence = cross-cultural research suggests that having multiple attachments is the room (fox 1977)
Stage theories = can be inflexible, such as in cultures where multiple attachments form first, or having multiple attachment is the norm (Fox 1977)
Do babies attach to the father, if so then when?
- Fathers are less likely to become a babies first attachment figure
- Schaffer & Emersons study: The majority of babies attach to their mothers around 7 months, 3% of fathers were the first attachment.
- 27% of fathers and mother were jointly attached
- By 18 months 75% of babies were jointly attached to their fathers (determined though separation protest)