Quiz 3 - post exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Psychoanalytic - Freud Phallic Stage

A
  • oedipal conflict = boys are sexually attracted to there mothers fear that father will find out, castrate,
    Electra Conflict = angry with mothers, envious of dads penis, unknown reason suppress desire with father and gender identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social Learning Gender typing

A
  • social learning = we learn in the context of others
  • Reinforcement = parent reinforce gender, way more acceptance with girls violating than boys, ex = tomboy
    Modeling = learning from tv, toys, parents, etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cognitive Development Kohlberg

A
  • Kohlberg believed children go through the following stages in the understanding of gender
  • Gender Identity = first established but don’t understand is permanent
  • gender stability = gender is not variable, going to hang around, thrown off by halloween
    Gender constancy = gender permanence, get the idea gender is stable and permanent (5-7 years old), kids get us vs them, in 1st- 2nd grade, girls play with girls, boys play with boys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gender Schema

A
  • combines social learning and cognitive developmental
  • children learn through imitation (role models) reinforcement and punishment, BUT children also use this info to construct gender schema
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The development of gender typing - environmental factors

A
  • family, school, peers, society, media, books, movies, tv, toys, school structure, authority figures,
  • present rigid roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The development of gender typing - children and toy play

A
  • can a toy impact children’s idea about gender
  • Ditmar et al (2006)
  • idea pushed that appearance matters for female gender roles, does barbie make girls want to be thing
  • 5-8 yr olds
  • exposed to barbies or Emmy (size 16 doll), or NO doll
  • gave a measure of body esteem, youngest girls exposed to Barbie exposed most desire for thinner
    Barbie results - baby like face on adult proportions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sexual Scripts - gagnon and Simon

A

sexual scripts start constructing as a kid
- what relationships are like, seen in Disney, disney most popular halloween costume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gender and Children’s environment

A

Rheingold and cook (1975)
- examined rooms of 48 boys and 48 girls, all under 6
- girls had more dolls, doll houses, domestic toys (kitchen, cleaning), floral motifs, ruffles/lace bedding
Boys = more educational toys, artistic materials, decorated with animals
- boys and grisl growing up in different ways greatly influence them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Blakemore and Centers (2005)

A
  • had undergrads rate kids toys, strongly masculine, masculine, non gendered, strongly feminine
  • 4 sets and then studied
  • had 700 undergraduates rate toys on developmental qualtieis
  • toys strongly feminine = nurturing, domestic skills, physical attractivnesss
  • Masculine toys = violent, competitive
  • said that kids being raised in different environments, encouraged on different pathways
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pomerlau - Bolduc, Macluit and Cosette

A
  • method physical/environmental 12- girls and boys compared toys, clothing, rooms
    boys = more veichles, sports, red clothes, blue, white, blue bedding
    Girls - had pink clothes, domestic toys, yellow bedding
    Asked who decorates/picks out clothes?
  • answer was female relatives, early on girls/boys different environments
    Older kids (randall) 2007
  • same thing
  • girls = more pictures of themselves
  • Boys = construction sets
  • said that social media heavily influenced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Childhood Obesity

A
  • 18.5% of Am. children meet criteria for childhood obesity
  • 80% of obese kids will remain obese adults
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Biological - childhood obesity

A
  • genetic
    -“obesogenic” environment
  • available high calorie food
  • limited physical activity
  • parents nervous to let kids run alone/safety
  • kids spend more time in front of screens (including schools)
  • most of it is sedentary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Food Deserts

A
  • no reasonably priced food within walking area fresh produce really pricey, doesn’t keep well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Environmental factors on childhood obesity

A
  • unhealthy eating behavior
  • kids very picky must offer 30-40x
  • externality hypothesis - suggests overweight individuals more likely, convinced to eat from external factors
    sedentary behavior
  • TV (screen time)
  • time spent in front of a TV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Schajter

A
  • developed externality hypothesis
  • ppl who are obese more susceptible to visual cues
  • restaurants venting into the streets
  • food tv commercials
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

TV programming and Food

A
  • center for science in the public interest (2009)
  • flemming - millici and Harri’s (200*0
  • used Nielsen data and compared 2008-2012
  • it increased dramatically for AA kids over white
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Healthy at every size

A
  • shifting question how to make kids healthy instead of thin
  • also shifting towards family oriented programs, because kid’s can’t
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Kids and Body Image

A
  • showed kids body silouttes
  • had to choose which bodies they most wanted to look like
  • girl.boy body options (skinny - fat)
    conclusions =
  • kids judge each other by appearance
  • especially in preschool, nore pressure on girls
  • researchers rated preschoolers on attractivness
  • researcher asked who they want to be friends with
  • 3-4 year olds girls attractivness mattered
  • boys did not care
    DATA - girls wanting to have thinner bodies, in both male and female
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

4th grade study on body image

A
  • subjects 817 4th graders, who were divided African Americans and white AA tend to have more body positivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Tantangelo and Ricciardelli (2017)

A
  • did interviews 8-10 years olds, boys and girls
  • did focus groups, 16 boys/girls in each group
    Themes
  • appearance related comparisons most common with girls
  • for boys, they found watching shows were inspiring, comparisons about sports/stregth
  • when girls were doing media comparisons, made them really feel badly, negative body images
    2nd study
  • boys comparisons about body functions
  • girsl appearances were related to body images
  • girls offered role models, who were pretty
  • boys offered role models who inspired them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Fluid Intelligence

A
  • things you can’t be taught, speed of processing
  • game where it flashes, red, ellow, green have to remember the order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Crystalized intelligence

A
  • who painted Mona Lisa
    Things that can be taught
  • you can keep learning new stuff your whole life
  • doing crossword puzzles, wordle, keeps our memory sharp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale

A
  • recognized there was diversity in the way we thought
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

IQ tests terrible uses

A
  • assessed who could be let in from, Ellis island used delibratly
  • used by army, discovered many soliders had reading issues, gave pictorals
  • determines who should be on the frontline, and who should be an officer
  • taking IQ tests - labeled a number, verbal scale, and non verable scale
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

IQ is it destiny

A
  • one of old celebrities has highest IQ ever
  • but she uses her big IQ to help people solve puzzles
26
Q

The IQ controversy

A
  • controversy that som epart of IQ may be biologically driven
  • previously just assumed that biology is destiny
27
Q

Hernstein and Murray - 1994

A
  • argued that IQ biologically based
  • the reason for AA low IQ is because of biology
  • led people to cut funding for school programs, like head start
28
Q

Jensen 1985

A
  • influenced politicians along the way
29
Q

Hernstein and Murray

A
  • wrote a book called bell curve
  • when you give IQ test you get a bell curve
  • curve is biologically based
  • the people at the top of hte curve become CEO, a presidents
  • folks at the bottom, end up, needing social support
  • programs cut, because kids with lower IQ scores can’t be helped
  • did cherry picking
30
Q

Scarr and Weinburg, 1983

A
  • kids who had been adopted had above average IQ, test means that is actually test of middle class whitness
31
Q

Shirley Brice Heath 1989

A
  • white/ AA moms reading book to children
  • realized white moms reading books like and IQ test, How many Bananas? What color is this
  • white AA moms related what was happening in real life
32
Q

Stereotype threat (mckowan and Weinstein) 2003

A
  • gave kids verbal tests
  • some told it was a test of how good kids are at school problems, others not told this
  • AA/Latin X kids struggled when told it was a test, but not when not told
  • Latin X kids who had strong stereotypes did poorly
  • this did not impact white kids
33
Q

Sternburg’s Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

A
  • consists of 3 sub-theories
  • Compoenetial/analytical subtheory
  • Experiential Subtheory (creative)
    Contextual subtheory
34
Q
  • Compoenetial/analytical subtheory
A
  • metacognitiion our knowledge of o
    ur own intelligence
  • better at remembering faces/names
  • better at essay tests over MC
  • easily distracted,
  • knowing your own capabilities, taking it into account when trying to solve problems
35
Q
  • Experiential Subtheory (creative)
A

novelty of task = when we face a task we’ve never seen before
- dealing with compelty new task
- truck stuck under bride, decide to deflate tires
Automatization of a task
- stroop test - colors/reading word
- people really fast at reading because of automatization
- cognitive processing freed up space so we can automate more

36
Q

Contextual subtheory

A

adapting - adapting to bigger classes in college, instead of small in HS, new ways to study, etc
- Shaping - shape your environment, you study 9-10 pm, then I can play my video games
- Selecting- something that fits them, selecting a new college

37
Q

Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligence

A
  • at the start a little bit of biology
  • mainstream view if your smart your smart, Gardner believed all abilities are independent
    Linguisitc, logico-mathmatical intellignece, musical intelligence, spatial intelligence, bodily kinesthetic, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, Naturalists
38
Q

Linguistic Intelligence

A
  • verbal intelligence
  • word, language, writing, into things live poetry, don’t mind giving presentations
  • like to read, like to be read to
  • gravitate towards debate club
  • explains things well
  • good at word play, puns
39
Q

Logico Mathematical Intelligence

A
  • good understanding of Piaget
  • STEM
  • good at problem solving, reasoning, recognizing patterns, think about numbers, relationships, engaged in empirical research, science fair
  • scientist, mathematician, engineer
40
Q

Musical Intelligence

A
  • like to sing
  • babies like to dance
  • manifest in young children
  • baby “dancing: hear music that other pepople don’t hear
  • music teacher, conductor, musician
41
Q

Spatial Intelligence

A
  • good at visual spatial
  • draw early
  • will us the whole sand box
  • drawn to artistic expression
  • use whole paper
  • like maps, charts
  • artist, architect, engineer
42
Q

Bodily Kinesthetic

A
  • people who are good at moving there bodies
  • good at sports, gaming, good at doing
  • mime, dancer, builder, sculpture
43
Q

Interpersonal Intelligence

A
  • involves understanding and relating to other people
  • work to create positive relations with others
    great at reading facial expressions/body language
  • ## psychologist, philosopher, sales person, politician
44
Q

Intrapersonal Intelligence

A

-goo dat being aware of there own personal feelings
- people are very in touch with own reasons, reflection
- understand why they are motivated
- sometimes people will see them as daydreaming
- introspective writer, philosopher, type of scientist

45
Q

Naturalistic Intelligence

A
  • very interested in natural world
  • in tune with nature, very interested, exploring environment, thrive in outdoors
  • dinosaur kids
  • biologist, conservationist, believes biological for everything
46
Q

Divergent thinking

A

creative solutions, would want this with some type of cancer, unique solutions

47
Q

Convergent thinking

A
  • thinking one way
  • this is needed with broken bones
48
Q

Mastery oriented Attributions

A

focus on process, learning for learning, sake not focused on grades, rewards, tends to believe you can try harder

49
Q

Performance Oriented attribution

A
  • focus on outcomes, like grades, do something well, not something they can change, critique of our school system we focus on this, token economy, plastic coins with different values
50
Q

Learned Helplessness

A
  • based dog learning task, placed in a skinner box
  • yolked together
  • if they hop over the wall environment changes, floor of cage would give electrical shock
  • only matters if dog A jumps and drags B
  • separated into a new boxes
  • Dog A learnes moving lever fixes problem
  • Dog B lays down because nothing it does matters
  • parents can contribute to this with conversations
  • concern with performance oriented tasks
51
Q

Sociometric Status (Peer Acceptance)

A
  • “nomination method” who do you want to play with, sit with, go over to there house
  • game up with popular, controversial, neglected, rejected
    Popular kids = lots and lots of likes, want to sit with them
    Rejected Kids = lots of dislikes
    Controversial Kids = get likes and dislikes, sometimes class clow
    Neglected Kids = don’t get mentioned, NO likes or dislikes, forgotten
    Average Children = get some likes and dislikes but not many
52
Q

Popular Kids

A
  • have good social skills
  • however we do have popular antisocial children (tough boys)
53
Q

Rejected Kids

A
  • two subtypes
  • rejected agressive = children, bullies
  • rejected withdrawn = withdraw socially, often kids that get bullied
54
Q

Van der wilt (2008)

A
  • studied language and peer sociometric status using nomination
  • kids who are rejected by peers show lower pragmatics in comparison to regular
  • suggestion = work on social skills
55
Q

Who bullies?

A
  • someone who intentionally, repeatedly causes harm to someone who has difficulty defending themselves,
  • being a victim to bully= emotional, sleep problems, anxiety, fear of going to school
56
Q

Cyberbullying

A
  • no longer refuge at home because even at home, cyberbullying continuous
  • in an age where feels necessary to go on phone, can’t escape, leads people to suicicde
57
Q

Signs of being bullied

A
  • unexplainable injuries
  • lost/broken property
  • frequent illness
  • changes in eating habits
  • difficulty sleeping
    -declining grades, wanting to go to school
  • sudden loss of friends
  • feelings of helplessness
  • self destructive behavior
58
Q

Signs a child is bullying

A
  • get into physical/violent fights
  • have friends who bully each other
  • increasingly aggressive
  • get sent to principal/detention often
  • have unexplained extra money, new belongings
59
Q

Risk?

A
  • those who are perceived as different
  • those perceived as weak
  • sociometric status is a factor
  • LGBTQ kids
60
Q

Epigenetic Possibilities (muldar et al 2020)

A
  • explores genes expression under environmental conditions
  • how bullying can impact way genes work
  • effect how easily a genes is read or not
    1,3332 kids studied
  • demythalation (genes being turned off/on)
    associated with bullying exposure
  • genes involving cardiac function, also nerve development