Qualitative- intersectionality and critical race theory and transformation Flashcards
Research is never neutral- some questions to ask
- why was the research topic chosen?
- which research projects pass ethics committees and which don’t- and why?
- who funds the research?
- which findings are made public?
- whose values are promoted?
- who benefits from the research?
- who evaluates the research?
How is research political?
it advances a particular agenda
-it silences particular topics and promotes certain interests
Power in research enterprise
- who dominates research institutions?
- who is promoting knowledge?
- higher educational institutions historically dominated by white men
- under representation of working class people in academia
Who’s voices are heard and who’s are silenced? - in Psychology
- research is historically male-centric, heterocentric
- the gender of theory
Who’s voices are heard and who’s are silenced? - in feminist research?
- earlier feminist scholarly work written by white privileged feminists about the issues of white privileged women
- the experiences and struggles of women of colour fell between the cracks in feminist AND anti-racist discourse.
How does research maintain and reproduce (class/gender/racial) stereotypes?
Research on stigmatized issues:
HIV/AIDS, intimate partner violence, street based sex work.
-usually conducted using samples drawn from disadvantaged and marginalised populations.
-financial compensation may be incentive
-wealthier populations are more difficult to access due to private service providers
What does the drawing of marginalised samples do?
The invisibility of privileged groups and the over-representation of the poor and marginalized in research means that social problems such as HIV and violence is being represented as a problem of the poor and disadvantaged.
What is reflexivity?
Practicing reflexivity means acknowledging and reflecting on how the researcher’s own presence may affect their research at every stage of the research process.
It is understanding that the researcher brings to the research process their own social Identity, fears, anxieties preconceived ideas and expectations… and that these matter.
Questions you might ask yourself in terms of reflexivity
Why did I choose this particular topic to research?
How do the questions I ask my participants influence what my findings will be?
How is my social identity (age, class, race, gender, sexuality, occupation, level of education) different or similar to that of my participant?
How does this affect the relationship which I establish with my participant?
How does this relationships affect what I find in my research
What preconceived ideas did I have about my participants?
What did I expect to find through my research?
How did this affect my research findings?
What pre-conceived ideas might my participants have of me
How did this effect how they behaved and what they might have said during interviews?
The research context
Macro: in the context of post-apartheid SA, in the context of UCT under-graduate residences
Interview-Participant relationship
-Two people in an interview process will always have “multiple and
specific identities that shape how the process takes place and, ultimately how the text gets developed”. That is to say, research is “a continuous dialogue between the interpreter and the interpreted”
Reflexivity is about the Secrets and Silences
Reflexivity is about acknowledging the dynamics at play within the research - often not spoken about or explicitly stated in the research reports.
How often do you read about the identity of the researcher in quantitative studies?
Does this identity still matter? YES!
3 types of standpoint methodologies
- feminist research
- anti-racist scholarship
- critical race theory
STANDPOINT METHODOLOGIES: 3 central premises
- seek to uncover or critique hidden or disguised relationships/ideas/power dynamics
- commitment to working in interests of oppressed and disadvantaged groups of people
- generally aimed at producing change (research-activism)
Historically Blackness and Black knowledge was constructed as:
- “primitive”, “uncivilized”, “pre-literate”
- Banthu education
- exclusion from universities, science etc
- racial discrimination rested upon ideological premises of difference and superiority
Principles/stages of Black scholarship
- disillusionment
- reactive engagement (criticising white research assumptions, challenge eurocentrism)
- constructive self definition (advocating an African world view in research and preserve cultural norms and traditions, African presence in research)
- Development of emancipatory discourse (promotion and respect of African values)