Psychopathology- Cognitive treatments for depression Flashcards
What does CBT aim to tackle simultaneously
Cognition and behaviour
What is the time period of CBT
Usually weekly or fortnightly
Lasts 30 mins to an hour
Lasts from 6 weeks to 6 months
What time frame does CBT focus on
The present
In CBT why are the problems broken down into parts
To identify patterns of thoughts, emotions and actions
What does CBT aim to challenge
Irrational thinking
Identifying negative thinking patterns:
Encourages the depressed patient to talk about the specific difficulties they experience and identify any ________ ___________ ______
Negative automatic thoughts
What does BDI stand for
Beck depression inventory
What is the BDI out of
0-63
How many questions are in the BDI and what are they scored out of
21
0-3
What does each question on the BDI relate to
A different symptom of depression
In CBT, the therapist seeks to challenge negative thoughts and present alternatives to the depressed individual.
What did Ellis call these alternative thoughts
Disputing beliefs
What do disputing beliefs help an individual to do
Rationalise thinking
What intervention techniques may the CBT therapist use to challenge negative cognitions
Relaxation techniques
Optimistic self statements
True or false:
As CBT is a collaborative process, some new skills will be given to practise in homework assignments
True
What happens at the end of the patients time with CBT
They take another assessment using self-reports (e.g the BDI), then the score is compared with the the first one.
What were the three conditions March et al compared
CBT
Antidepressants
CBT and antidepressants
How many adolescents were in March et al’s study
327
What were the results of March et al’s study
After 36 weeks, 86% of the CBT plus antidepressant group had significantly improved compared to 81% of other groups
Evaluating CBT as a treatment for depression
-evidence from March et al
There is evidence that supports the use of CBT with depression
March et al. (2007) compared i) CBT, ii) antidepressants and iii) a combination of CBT plus antidepressants in 327 adolescents.
After 36 weeks, 86% of the CBT plus antidepressant group had significantly improved compared to 81% of other groups
This illustrates the effectiveness of CBT in treating depression (without the unwanted side effects of medication e.g. addiction)
Evaluating CBT as a treatment for depression
- aetiological fallacy?
The success of CBT could lead to an aetiological fallacy being made whereby we assume the causes of depression are cognitive because the cognitive treatments are successful.
For instance, just because some symptoms can be removed in CBT, does not necessarily mean the causes can be solely cognitive in origin
Therefore, it is important to keep an open mind to the causes of depression and not have this view narrowed by the success of certain treatments
Evaluating CBT as a treatment for depression
-more effective long term treatment
CBT tackles the root problem of depression, unlike biological treatments such as antidepressants.
This improves the chances that the depressive episode will be short-lived and reduces the chances of relapses further down the line.
This could be because of the skill acquisition component of CBT helps to INOCULATE depressed patients against further episodes of depression
Therefore, it could be argued that the effects of CBT are more effective and longer lasting than alternatives
Evaluating CBT as a treatment for depression
-Lubrosky
Some psychologists argue that improvements with CBT are actually rooted in the therapist-patient relationship.
It may be the quality of this therapeutic relationship that determines any improvement not techniques in CBT.
Luborsky (2002) has found very little differences between therapies, which supports the view that having someone to talk to who will listen matters most in recovery from depression.
Evaluating CBT as a treatment for depression
-individual differences
One issue with CBT is that it requires motivation. Patients with severe depression may not engage with CBT, or even attend the sessions and therefore this treatment will be ineffective in treating these patients.
In addition, CBT seems to be more effective for those who have high a high degree of insight into their condition.
This may be because you need to be able to verbalise your inner thoughts AND mentally engage with the process of disputing faulty thinking.