Asch, Zimbardo and Milgram Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Asch’s aim

A

To examine the extent to which social pressure from a majority affects individual conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Asch’s sample

A

123 white American men pts in groups of 7-9 on a round table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Asch’s procedure

A

A “real” ppt was seated in a row among confederates.

The ppt was seated 6th in a row of 7 people.

The goal of the study was to examine perceptual judgments & the participants were instructed to pick which of 3 lines “matched” a standard line.

The true ppt could see that one of the lines was obviously a match, the others obviously wrong.

In 12 out of the 18 studies (the critical studies) the confederates were told to give the WRONG answer.

In 6 trials they gave the wrong answer of a longer line.
In 6- a wrong short line was identified.

The real ppt was seated second to last so listened to the same wrong answer over and over before giving theirs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asch’s overall conformity rate

A

37%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many conformed on every critical trial, Asch

A

5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many remained completely independent
Asch

A

25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many conformed at least once
Asch

A

75%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were Asch’s 3 variations

A
  1. Difficulty of tasks
  2. Size of majority
    A group size of 3 led to conformity, but adding further confederates made little difference to whether or not the participants conformed.
  3. Unanimity
    Asch introduced a confederate who disagreed with the others. The presence of a dissenting confederate led to reduced conformity This suggests that the influence of the majority depends to some extent on the group being unanimous.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was error rate when pts tested alone
Asch

A

less than 1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1 participant : 1 confederate =
1 participant : 2 confederate =
1 participant : 3 confederate =

A

3%
13%
32%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Asch change size of majority

A

from 1-15 to see if the number of people made more of a difference.

In a very small group, conformity rose to 32%, most people are sensitive to the views of others so needed little influence.

In a large scale group, very little difference in conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Asch change the unamity of the group and what were the results

A

Introduced a confederate who acted as a dissenter within the group. The real pp conformed less when the dissenter was there

Variation one: confederate asked to give correct answer, conformity dropped to 5%

Variation two: confederate asked to give a different incorrect answer, conformity dropped to 9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Zimbardo aim

A

people would conform to the roles of guards and prisoners in a role-playing simulation of a prison environment.

To test whether prison violence was down to the sadistic nature of the personalities within the prison or if the

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zimbardo procedure

A

21 male university students responded to a newspaper advert that offered $15 a day to take part in an experiment. 21 students were picked (the most mentally and physically stable – 10 guards and 11 prisoners). They were randomly allocated to the roles. Zimbardo played the role of the prison superintendent.
Prisoners were dehumanised , deloused, fingerprinted and stripped. Prisoners were given uniforms that were bleak, whilst guards were given a superior uniform with sunglasses , truncheons and handcuffs, etc.
9 prisoners were placed 3 to a cell and the study was planned to run for 2 weeks, but was eventually cut short.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How early did 1st prisoner leave

A

36 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When ws study stopped

A

6 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Zimbardo resulst

A

Both groups settled quickly into their roles. An early prisoner revolution was crushed and the guards consolidated their power by increasingly severe punishments.

The prisoners failed to seriously question the guard’s motives and delegation of tasks, suggesting they were conforming to their given social roles.

One prisoner had to be withdrawn after 36 hours due to uncontrollable fits of rage and crying. 3 more had similar symptoms in the days afterwards and were released.

The study was stopped after only 6 days, and only after Zimbardo was shown the extent of the damage by a visiting psychologist.

Both roles later expressed surprise at how they acted in the situation.

18
Q

Zimbardo conclude

A

The situational explanation appears to have been supported here, as the group were considered mentally stable beforehand, suggesting that the situational had been the main driver behind the behaviour.

People readily conform to social roles, regardless of the morality of the situation.

19
Q

Milgram aim

A

To see if people would obey the orders of an authority figure, even when there were fatal consequences.

20
Q

Milgram sample

A

40 American men with a range of educational and occupational , volunteer

21
Q

What happened when Milgram volunteers arrived

A

They were introduced to another participant (actually confederate): Mr. Neill Wallace. He chatted with the ppt beforehand and said he had been out of work for a while due to having a heart attack 6 months ago.

22
Q

Were the lots fixed for teacher and learner

A

yes

23
Q

Teacher thought learner could hear but was actually

A

A recording

24
Q

could teacher see learner

A

no

25
Q

What did voltage increase by

A

15v

26
Q

What did voltage go up to

A

450v

27
Q

What were 4 prods

A

Prod 1: Please continue.
Prod 2: The experiment requires you to continue.
Prod 3: It is absolutely essential that you continue.
Prod 4: You have no other choice but to continue.

28
Q

100% went up to what voltage

A

300v

29
Q

how many went up to highest voltage 450v

A

65%

30
Q

__._% stopped after ___V

A

12.5
300

31
Q

How many had seizures

A

3

32
Q

Milgram shows support for legitimacy of authority
moving the study from the prestigious Yale University to a run down office block lowered obedience levels from __% to __%.

A

65
47.5

33
Q

How many obeyed when
Loss of uniform

A

20%

34
Q

How many obeyed when
Close proximity

A

40%

35
Q

How many obeyed when
Touch proximity

A

30%

36
Q

How many conformed when
Orders over phone

A

21%

37
Q

How many conformed when
Social support off disobedient role model
Went to 450V

A

15%

38
Q

What happened in loss of uniform

A

The experimenter appeared to be an ordinary member of society (a confederate) without wearing
the white coat.
Actual level of obedience: 20%

39
Q

what happened in location variable

A

Experimenter moved from prestigious yale uni to a rundown office block in nearby bridge port
Actual level of obedience: 47.5%

40
Q

what happened in proximity variation

A

1- Learner moved into the same room as teacher
Actual level of obedience: 40%

2- Teacher instructed to hold learners hand on shock plate
Actual level of obedience: 30%

41
Q

What happened in remote authority

A

Experimenter left room and gave instructions over the phone
Actual level of obedience: 20.5%