Psychopathology Flashcards
What are the four things that can define abnormality
- Statistical infrequency
- Deviation from social norms
- Failure to function adequately
- Deviation from ideal mental health.
What is statistical infrequency?
Statistical infrequency refers to behaviour observed numerically.
- Numerically common behaviour is viewed as “normal”
- Numerically uncommon behaviour is viewed as “abnormal”
The further the behaviour deviates from the statistical norm (e.g: the mean) the more abnormal the behaviour perceived.
What is an example of abnormality measured through statistical infrequency?
- IQ in intellectual ability.
This is a reliably measured characteristic.
What is meant by normal distribution in statistical infrequency?
This is where, in statistical measures, scores will cluster around the average, and scores that are located further above or below the mean will become less prevalent.
This is called normal distribution.
What is the average IQ and the IQ that can diagnose people as intellectually disabled?
- Average IQ: 100 (68% of population)
- Lowest IQs: 70 (2% of population)
What is the disorder attributed to an IQ of under 70?
Intellectual disability disorder
(IDD)
Evaluate statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality.
- Real world application.
One strength of using statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality is it’s usefulness. Statistical infrequency can be used in clinical practice, both as part of formal diagnosis and as a way to assess severity of symptoms. For example, diagnosis of an intellectual disability disorder requires an IQ of below 70 (bottom 2%). An example of real world application of statistical infrequency is it’s use in the assessment tool Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A score of 30+ (top 5% of respondents) is widely interpreted as indicating severe depression. This shows that the value of the statistical infrequency criterion is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes. - Unusual characteristics can be positive.
A limitation of statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality is that infrequent characteristics can be positive, as well as negative. For everyone with an IQ <70, there is someone with an IQ of 130+. Yet, we would not perceive someone as abnormal for having a high IQ. Similarly, we would not think of someone with a very low depression score on the BDI as abnormal. These examples outline that being unusual or at one end of a psychological spectrum does not necessarily make one abnormal. This means that, although statistical infrequency can form part of assessment or diagnostic procedures, it is never sufficient in being the sole basis of abnormality due to lack of application on alternative sides of spectrums.
What is deviation from social norms?
Where someone behaves in a manner that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community of society.
Are accepted social norms universal?
NO!
Norms are specific to the culture that we live in.
Social norms are different for each culture, so there are relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal.
For example, homosexuality was considered abnormal in our culture in the past, yet remains abnormal in other cultures where it is deemed illegal.
What is an example of deviation from social norms?
- Anti-social personality disorder.
(or psychopathy)
We make the social judgement that psychopaths are abnormal because they don’t conform to and offend our moral standards.
Psychopathic behaviour would be considered abnormal in a very wide range of cultures.
Evaluate deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality
- Real world application.
One strength of deviation from social norms is it’s useful application. DFSN can be used in clinical practice for diagnostic purposes. For example, the key defining characteristic of anti-social personality disorder is the failure to conform to culturally acceptable ethical behaviour. Symptoms of the disorder such as recklessness, aggression, violating the rights of others and deceitfulness are all deviations from social norms. Such norms also play a role in the diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder, where the term ‘strange’ is used to characterize the thinking, behavior and appearance of people with this disorder. This shows that deviation from social norms criterion can have psychiatric use and value. - Cultural and situational relativism.
One limitation of DFSN is the variance between social norms in different cultures, and even different situations. A person from one cultural group may label someone from another group as abnormal using their standards rather than the other individuals cultural standards.
For example, hearing voices is normal in some cultures as a part of spirituality but abnormal in others such as Western cultures. In addition, social norms can differ from one situation to another. Aggressive and deceitful behaviour in the context of family life is more socially unacceptable than in the context of corporate deal-making. This means that it is difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures. - Human rights abuses
A limitation of using deviation from social norms to define someone as abnormal is that it has historical risk of unfair labelling, making individuals vulnerable
to human rights abuses. Historically, diagnosis of nymphomania (female excessive sexual desire) and drapetomania (the running away of slaves) have been historically weaponised, creating violations. This means that this definition of abnormality may be socially sensitive and can risk mistreatment of individuals.
What is meant by failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality?
Where someone is unable to cope with the demands of everyday life
What are examples of when someone is failing to function adequately?
- No longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules such as maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space.
- When a person experiences severe personal distress
- When a persons behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to others.
Who proposed the signs of someone failing to function adequately?
Rosenhan and Seligman
What is an example of someone failing to function adequately?
Intellectual disability disorder.
An individual must be failing to function adequately before a diagnosis would be given.
Evaluate “Failure to function adequately” as a definition of abnormality.
- Represents a threshold for help
One strength of the failure to function adequately criterion is that is represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help. Most have symptoms of a mental disorder to some degree at some time. In fact, 25% of people in the UK will experience a MH problem in any given year. Despite this, many are able to persist despite fairly severe symptoms. This criterion identifies when a person would need to be referred to or seek professional help, when one ceases to function adequately. This criterion, therefore, means that treatment and services can be targeted to those most in need of intervention. - Discrimination and social control
A limitation of the failure to function adequately definition is that it is relatively easy to label non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal. In practice, it can be very hard to judge when someone is failing to function adequately or choosing to deviate. Some individuals, for example, who are not employed or do not have a permanent place of residence could be unreasonably classed, when it could just be an alternative lifestyle. Similarly, those who participate in high-risk leisure activities could be classed as irrational and perhaps a danger to themselves when it is a hobby, such as cliff diving.
This means individuals can be falsely labelled abnormal when they are simply making non-conventional choices, and can have their freedom of choice restricted. - Failure to function not always abnormal
Another limitation of failure to function adequately is that this definition fails to acknowledge the context behind ‘abnormality.’ In some circumstances, such as in the event of bereavement this label may be inappropriate due to their reaction to a difficult circumstance. This means that FTFA may be inappropriate to use in many scenarios as it disregards context.
What is deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality?
Where someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health.
What makes deviation from ideal mental health different from the other definitions of abnormality?
It ignores the issue of what makes someone abnormal and and instead considers what makes someone ‘normal’
According to Jahoda, what does ideal mental health look like?
- No symptoms of distress
- Rational and perceive ourselves accurately
- Self-actualisation
- Cope with stress
- Have a realistic view of the world
- Have a good self esteem and lack guilt
- Independent of other people
- Can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
Evaluate ‘Deviation from ideal mental health’ as a definition of abnormality.
- A comprehensive definition.
One strength of deviation from ideal mental health is that this criterion is highly comprehensive. Jahoda’s concept of ideal mental health includes a range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from mental disorders. This criteria covers most reasons as to why we may seek help (or be referred for) professional psychiatric help. This can be discussed by professionals with different theoretical views, such as a medically trained psychiatrist who focuses on symptoms to a humanistic counsellor who takes interest in self-actualization.
This means that ideal mental health provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and others, and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals with different specialties. - May be culture-bound
One limitation of the ideal mental health criterion is that different elements are not equally applicable across a range of cultures. Much of Jahoda’s criteria is firmly located in the context of Western cultures. In particular, the concept of self-actualization would most likely be dismissed as self-indulgent in most of the world, especially in collectivist cultures. Even within Western cultures there are variations in the value placed on personal independence, such as Germany emphasizing personal independence and Italy having a low value on personal independence. Furthermore, what defines success in our working, social and love-lives is very different in different cultures. This means that it is difficult to apply the concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another. - Extremely high standards
It is relatively impossible to attain and maintain all of Jahoda’s criteria for mental health.
What are the DSM-5 categories of phobias?
- Specific phobia (situation or object)
- Social phobia/anxiety (social situation)
- Agoraphobia (being outside or in public)
What is a phobia?
An irrational fear of an object or a situation.
What does “cognitive” refer to in characterising disorders?
Refers to the process of “knowing”, including thinking, remembering, reasoning and believing.
What does “emotional” refer to in characterising disorders?
Related to a persons feelings or mood