Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define: Reciprocity.

A

Reciprocity is where an infant will respond to the actions of a care-giver, eliciting a response from the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by interactional synchrony?

A
  • The care-giver and baby reflect both the actions and emotions of the other.
  • They do this in a co-ordinated (synchronised) manner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is attachment measured?

A
  • Proximity
  • Separation distress
  • Secure base behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is another term for reciprocal interactions.

A

Turn-taking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are 2 components of reciprocity?

A
  • Alert phases
  • Active involvement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by an infants alert phase?

A
  • A periodic phase in which they signal (eye-contact or noise) that they are ready for a spell of interaction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What fraction of the time will mothers detect babies alert phases?

A

2/3 of the time.
This will vary depending on the skill of the mother and external factors such as stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by active involvement?

A

Active involvement refers to the ability of the baby, as well as the caregiver, being able to initiate an interaction.
(This is opposed to the baby taking a passive role)
They also appear to take turns in doing so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What occurs in interactional synchrony?

A

The infant and caregiver carry out the same reaction simultaneously - both individuals act in such a way that their actions and emotions mirror the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State Meltzoff and Moore’s observation into caregiver-infant interactions.

A
  • Meltzoff and Moore observed the beginning of synchrony in babies as young as two weeks.
    1) An adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three distinctive gestures.
    2) The babies response was filmed and labelled by independent observers.

Findings: The babies expression and gestures were more likely to mirror the caregiver more than chances would predict. (there was a significant association).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two types of caregiver-infant interactions?

A
  • Reciprocity
  • Interactional synchrony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

State Isabella et al. research into interactional synchrony.

A
  • Isabella et al. observed 30 mothers and babies together and assessed the degree of synchrony. Researchers also investigated the quality of mother-baby attachment.

Findings: They found that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment (for example, the emotional intensity of the relationship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate caregiver-infant interactions.

A
  • Filmed observations ✔
  • Difficulty observing babies ✘
  • Does not clarify if these have developmental importance ✘
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 4 stages of attachment?
(in order)

A
  • Asocial stage
  • Indiscriminate stage
  • Specific attachment
  • Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who studied / founded the stages of attachment?

A

Schaffer and Emerson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the asocial stage of attachment.

A

In the asocial stage (first 3 weeks)..

  • Babies observable behaviour towards inanimate objects and humans is fairly similar.
  • Schaffer and Emerson believe that there is a tendency to show human preference.
  • Babies show a preference for familiar people, more easily comforted by them.
  • At this stage, the baby is beginning to form bonds.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the indiscriminate stage.

A

In the indiscriminate stage (2-7 months)..

  • Babies display more obvious and observable social behaviours.
  • Show a clear preference for being with other humans as opposed to inanimate objects.
  • They can recognise and find comfort in the presence of familiar people.
  • They WILL usually accept cuddles and comfort from any person.
  • They do not usually show separation OR stranger anxiety.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe the specific attachment stage.

A

In specific attachment (7+ months)

  • Babies display attachment to display classic signs of attachment towards a singular person. (e.g.: stranger and separation anx.)
  • The person who they form a specific attachment to is called the primary attachment figure.
    (This is not necessarily who the individual spends the most time with - it is the one who offers more interaction and is the most skilled at detecting the babies signals)
  • This is the mother 65% of the time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the multiple attachment stage.

A

In the multiple attachment stage.. (7+)

  • Occurs shortly after specific attachment, extending into multiple attachments.
  • The people they have bonded to after regularly spending time with are called secondary attachments.
  • Schaffer and Emerson found that 29% of the children observed formed secondary attachments within a month of forming a primary attachment.
  • By the age of one year the majority of babies had developed multiple attachments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Outline Schaffer and Emerson’s research.

A

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.
- Involved 60 Glaswegian babies.
- The babies were working-class.
- Researchers visited every month for the first year and then again at 18 months.
- The researcher asked mothers questions surrounding their response to separation and strangers.

  • From this, Schaffer and Emerson were able to formulate distinct stages involved in infant attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Evaluate Schaffer’s stages of attachment.

A
  • Practical application (nursery) ✔
  • Good external validity (natural) ✔
  • Generalizability (only Glaswegians) ✘
  • Mothers can be unreliable observers ✘
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define what is meant by the “father” in psychology.

A

The father is anyone who adopts the role of the main male caregiver regardless of biological relation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

In Schaffer and Emerson’s study, what % of the time did fathers become the primary attachment figure?

A

3% of the time.
(In 27% the father was the joint first object of attachment with the mother)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

In Schaffer and Emerson’s study what percentage of babies formed an attachment with their fathers by 18 months?

A

75% of babies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Outline Klaus Grossmans study into distinctive roles of the father.

A

LONGITUDINAL STUDY.
Grossmann followed babies up into their adolescent years, looking at how both parents behavior and their relationships with the baby influenced the quality of attachments later in life.

  • Grossmann found that a quality of babies attachments with the mothers, NOT THE FATHERS, was related to attachment in adolescence.
    This suggests that the fathers role is less significant than a mothers.
  • However, Grossmann also found that the quality of the fathers play with the infant was related to adolescent attachments.
    This suggests that fathers do have a distinctive role, relating to play and stimulation as opposed to emotional development.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What happens when fathers adopt the role of primary caregivers?

A

The fathers are able to adopt an emotional role typically associated with mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Outline Fields study into the role of the father.

A
  • Field filmed 4-month old babies in face-to-face interactions with:
    Primary caregiver mothers
    Primary caregiver fathers
    Secondary caregiver fathers.
  • Primary caregiver fathers, like primary caregiver mothers, spent more time smiling, imitating and holding babies compared to secondary caregiver fathers.
    This shows reciprocity and interactional synchrony.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Evaluate the “role of the father.”

A
  • Vague research questions, lack of clarity over what is asked. ✘
  • Challenges to distinctive role: presence of lesbian and single mothers. ✘
  • Counterpoint: lesbians and single mothers may fill in and account for role. ✔
  • Real world application: reassurance to families through advice. ✔
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Who were the two psychologists who investigated animal attachments?

A

Harlow and Lorenz.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What did Lorenz investigate in his animal studies?

A
  • Imprinting
  • The critical period
  • Sexual imprinting.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Outline Lorenz’s procedure in studying geese.

A

Lorenz randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs in a classic experiment.
Half of the clutch were hatched with their mother, the other half were incubated where the first moving object they saw was him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What did Lorenz find in his experiment on geese?

A
  • The incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere
  • The control group, hatched in the presence of their mother followed her.
  • When the two groups were mixed, the control group still followed the mother whereas the experimental group followed Lorenz.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is meant by imprinting? (geese case study)

A

Imprinting, regarding geese, is where birds that are mobile from birth will follow the first moving object they see upon hatching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is meant by the critical period?

A

The idea that attachment has to form within a certain time scale, or it will never happen :(
Lorenz found that if imprinting does not occur within the critical period, chicks did not attach themselves to a mother figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is meant by sexual imprinting?

A

The concept that there is a relationship between imprinting and adult mate preferences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What case study conducted by Lorenz investigated sexual imprinting?

A
  • Peacock that had been reared in a zoos reptile house.

The first moving object the peacock saw when hatching were giant tortoises.
As an adult the peacock would only direct courtship behavior to giant tortoises.
Lorenz concluded that this meant the peacock had undergone sexual imprinting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What was Harlow’s procedure when investigating attachment in monkeys?

A
  • Harlow had observed that newborns kept alone in a bare cage often died, however, they usually survived if provided with something soft like a cloth to cuddle.

The procedure:
Harlow reared 16 baby monkeys using two models.
There was a plain wire ‘mother’ that provided milk and a clothed ‘mother’ that dispensed milk depending on what was being tested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Outline Harlow’s findings into attachment in animals.

A
  • The monkeys displayed a clear preference to the cloth mother, seeking comfort from them when frightened.
    (Harlow had presented a noisy mechanical teddy bear)
  • This applied regardless if the cloth mother dispensed milk or not.
  • This demonstrates how, to monkeys, comfort was more important to the monkeys than food when it came to attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How did maternal deprivation have an impact on Harlow’s monkeys in adulthood?

A
  • Monkeys reared with plain-wire mothers only were the most dysfunctional
  • The monkey group overall did not develop normal social behaviour.
    The monkeys were more aggressive and less sociable than other monkeys.
  • The monkeys bred less due to being unskilled in mating, in the event where they became mothers, some neglected or attacked their children.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is the critical period for monkeys to form attachment, proposed by Harlow.

A

90 days for attachment to form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Evaluate animal studies into attachment.

A
  • Research support (ducks) ✔
  • Generalizability to humans ✘
  • Real world value (Harlow) ✔
    (Has helped psychologists identify that lack of bonding experience is a risk factor to poor child development - research is not theoretical it is also practical)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is learning theory in attachment?

A

A theory based on the behaviorist approach.
The learning theory emphasizes learning in the formation of behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How does learning theory explain attachment?

A

Attachment behaviours can be formed from classical and operant conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is “cupboard love”?

A

Where the importance of the attachment figure is surrounding the role as a food provider.
(Proposes that children learn to love whoever feeds them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What is the process of classical conditioning?

A
  • Unconditioned stimulus → unconditioned response.
  • Neutral stimulus → No response
  • Unconditioned + neutral stimulus → unconditioned response
  • Conditioned stimulus → conditioned response.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

In relation to food, how does classical conditioning operate in learning theory?

A
  • Food is an unconditioned stimulus, creating an unconditioned response of pleasure in the baby.
  • The caregiver begins as a neutral stimulus, prompting no response initially.
  • When the caregiver provides food, over time the baby associates the caregiver with the satiation of hunger.
  • From this, the neutral stimulus becomes the conditioned stimulus.
  • Once conditioning occurs, the caregiver will produce a conditioned response in the infant of pleasure / love.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What is classical conditioning?

A

Classical conditioning is learning through associating two stimuli together to produce a conditioned response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What is operant conditioning?

A

Operant conditioning involves learning from consequence.
If behavior produces a pleasant consequence, it is more likely to be repeated again - known as being REINFORCED.

49
Q

What is meant by attachment as a secondary drive?

A
  • Drive reduction comes into play.
  • Hunger is a primary drive, we are motivated to eat to satiate and reduce the hunger drive.
  • Psychologists believe that as caregivers provide food, the drive of hunger becomes generalised to them.
  • Attachment is this a secondary drive, learned by association with the caregiver and satisfaction of a primary drive.
50
Q

How does operant conditioning work on the baby in social learning theory?

A
  • Babies will cry, leading to a response from the caregiver such as feeding.
    As long as the caregiver gives the correct response, crying is reinforced.
51
Q

How does operant conditioning work on the adult in learning theory?

A
  • Caregivers will respond to a babies cry for comfort, leading to a response from the caregiver to pacify the crying.
    This is NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT.
52
Q

Evaluate learning theory as an explanation for attachment.

A
  • Counter evidence from Harlow’s monkeys
    (Comfort > Food) ✘
  • Counter evidence from human studies
    (Schaffer and Emerson found that babies mostly attached to their mothers regardless) ✘
  • Conditioning may play a role
    (However, not with food but rather with feeling comforted) ✔
53
Q

Is operant conditioning a two way process in attachment?
(Learning theory)

A

Yes !
Mutual reinforcement strengthens an attachment.

54
Q

What is meant by the term ‘monotropic’ in Bowlby’s theory?

A

Proposed by Bowlby, monotropy is the emphasis that a singular specific attachment is different from others and is of central importance in child development.

55
Q

What are the two principles of monotropy?

A
  • The law of continuity
  • The law of accumulated separation
56
Q

What is the law of continuity in Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A

The more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better quality their attachment.

57
Q

What is the law of accumulated separation in Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A

The effects of every separation with the mother adds up and the ‘safest dose’ is ‘zero dose’.

58
Q

Why is Bowlby’s theory described as ‘monotropic’?

A
  • He placed great emphasis on a child’s attachment to ONE particular caregiver.
  • He believed that the child’s to this singular caregiver is different and more important than the others.
59
Q

According to Bowlby’s theory of monotropy, what is a social releaser and what is its purpose?

A
  • A innate set of behaviors babies are born with to encourage attention from adults (example: cooing, gripping and smiling).
  • Their purpose is to initiate adult social interaction, thus creating attachment in the adult towards the baby.
60
Q

Is attachment reciprocal according to Bowlby?

A

YES!
Attachment is a reciprocal process.
Both mother and baby are hardwired to become attached.

61
Q

According to Bowlby, when was the baby most sensitive in the critical period?

A

6 months
(the child is maximally sensitive at 6 months when the infants attachment system is active)

62
Q

What did Bowlby believe would happen if the attachment was not formed in the critical period?

A

A child will find it difficult to form a relationship later, or they will never be able to form one at all.

63
Q

What is the internal working model in Bowlby’s theory of monotropy?

A

A child’s mental representation of their relationship with their primary attachment figure, providing a model of what relationships are like in the future.

64
Q

What are the 4 components of Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A
  • Monotropism + principals
  • Social releasers
  • The critical period
  • Internal working model.
65
Q

Evaluate Bowlby’s theory of monotropy.

A
  • Case study contradiction.
    (The study of the Czech twins who were once thought to be disabled due to severe abuse and missing the CRITICAL PERIOD went on to form functional adult relationships and operate normally)
  • Schaffer and Emerson counterevidence.
    (In this study, they found that a significant minority formed multiple attachments at the same time as the formation of the specific attachment - 27% to both parents - this challenges monotropy and counteracts the idea of the importance of the babies specific primary attachment.)
  • Support for social releasers.
    (Brazelton used the still face experiment to test the idea of social releasers, the baby became distressed when not responded to. Therefore, it shows that they are important in the process of attachment.)
  • Support for the internal working model.
    (Bailey’s 99 mothers study showed that the mothers quality of attachment influenced how the baby was attached - reinforcing the importance of the internal working model in influencing mothers attachments to their baby)
66
Q

What are the three types of attachment witnessed in infants?

A
  • Secure attachment.
  • Insecure-resistant attachment
  • Insecure-avoidant attachment.
67
Q

Who created the “Strange Situation” observation?

A

Ainsworth.

68
Q

What was the “Strange Situation” ?

A

A controlled observation designed to measure the security of attachment in babies.

69
Q

What was the location of the “Strange Situation”

A

It was located in a highly controlled lab with a two way mirror and/or cameras from which the psychologists could observe the baby.
The room was filled with toys.

70
Q

What infant behaviours were used to judge attachment in the “Strange Situation” research?

A
  • Proximity seeking
  • Exploration and secure base behaviour.
  • Stranger anxiety
  • Separation anxiety
  • Response to reunion.
71
Q

What is the Strange Situations procedure.

A

1) The child and caregiver enter an unfamiliar room.
2) The child is encouraged to explore
3) A stranger comes in and attempts to interact with the child
4) The caregiver leaves the child and the stranger together.
5) The caregiver returns and the stranger leaves.
6) The caregiver leaves the child alone.
7) The stranger returns
8) The caregiver returns and is reunited with the child.

72
Q

What behaviours in the strange situation are exhibited by children with secure attachments?

A
  • The babies explore happily but regularly return to the caregiver.
  • Moderate separation distress.
  • Moderate stranger anxiety.
  • Require and accept comfort easily from CG upon reunion.
73
Q

What behaviours in the strange situation are exhibited by children with insecure-avoidant attachment?

A
  • Babies explore freely.
  • Low proximity seeking.
  • Low safe base behaviour
  • Low separation anxiety
  • Low stranger anxiety
  • Little effort to make contact upon reunion.
74
Q

What behaviours in the strange situation are exhibited by children with insecure-resistant attachment?

A
  • Seek greater proximity
  • Low exploration
  • High secure base behaviour
  • High stranger anxiety
  • High separation anxiety
  • Resists comfort upon reunion, being unable to be consoled.
75
Q

What percentage of British infants are securely attached?

A

60-75%

76
Q

What percentage of British infants have insecure-avoidant attachment?

A

20-25%

77
Q

What percentage of British infants had insecure-resistant attachment?

A

3%

78
Q

Evaluate type of attachments.

A
  • Good predictive validity.
    (Predicts patterns such as bullying)
  • Cultural bias
    (Does not have the same meaning across cultures - such as the Japanese resistant and German avoidant)
  • Another attachment type?
    (Does not account for infants who deviate from the three categories)
    DISORGANISED!
  • Inter-rater reliability.
    (Multiple researchers can watch the controlled conditions)
79
Q

Who did a meta-analysis on cultural variations in attachment type?

A

van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg.

80
Q

How many strange situation studies were meta-analysed by van IJzendoorn?

A
  • 32 studies of attachment over 8 countries
    ! 15 were in the US
  • Yielded results for 1990 children.
81
Q

What did van IJzendoorn find in his cultural variation meta-analysis?

A
  • In all countries secure attachment was the most common classification.
  • 75% were secure in Britain compared to 50% in China.
82
Q

What is the variation in attachment between individualist cultures and collectivist cultures?

A
  • In individualist cultures, rates of insecure-resistant attachment were similar to Ainsworths original study.
  • In collectivist cultures, rates of insecure- resistant attachment were higher than 25%
    In addition, insecure-avoidant types saw a reduction.
83
Q

Were there larger variations BETWEEN cultures or WITHIN cultures?

A
  • Variations are larger WITHIN cultures, being 150% higher than those between countries.
  • For example: in the US one sample size produced 46% securely attached while another sample produced as high as 90% securely attached.
84
Q

What are the other two studies (not IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg) that looked at cultural variations?

A
  • An Italian study by Simonelli
  • A Korean study by Mi Kyoung Jin.
85
Q

Outline the Italian study and it’s findings.

A

Conducted a study in Italy to see whether proportions matched Ainsworths strange situation.

  • Assessed 78 babies aged 12 months using the strange situation.
  • 50% were secure.
  • 36% insecure-avoidant.

This is a lower rate of secure attachment and a higher rate of insecure attachment compared to other studies.

It is suggested that this is attributed to mothers working longer hours and using professional childcare.

! This shows that patterns of attachment type are not static, instead varying with cultural change.

86
Q

Outline the Korean study and it’s findings.

A

Mi Kyoung Jin compared the proportion of Korean attachment types to other studies.

  • The strange situation was used to assess 87 babies.
  • The overall proportions of insecure and secure babies were similar to those in most countries, with most babies being secure.
  • Most babies who were insecure here were RESISTANT, only 1 was avoidant.

This distribution is similar to Japan, according to IJzendoorn due to the two countries having similar child rearing styles.

87
Q

What conclusions can be drawn from cultural variation studies?

A
  • Secure attachment is the norm in a wide range of cultures.
  • This supports Bowlby’s theory that attachment is innate and universal.
  • However, cultural practises DO have an influence on attachment type.
88
Q

Evaluate cultural variations of attachment.

A
  • Indigenous researchers.
    (such as Grossmann and Takahashi, increasing validity through increasing language understanding and directions)
  • Confounding variables.
    (Social characteristics such as class and income aren’t accounted for, in addition, the environmental variable of the room may differ)
  • Imposed etic.
    (It tries to impose a test designed for one cultural context into another, findings do not hold the same meanings in different cultures)
  • Stereotype bias
    (Some studies such as Tronick and Morelli’s look at cultures outside of their own, creating more difficulty bias and cross-cultural communication)
89
Q

What is the difference between maternal separation vs maternal deprivation?

A
  • Separation is the child not being in the presence of their PAF.
  • Deprivation is where the child is deprived of emotional care from their PAF.

Brief instances where the child is with a substitute CG who can provide emotional care is not significant.
HOWEVER, extended separation can lead to deprivation and causes harm.

90
Q

Who created the theory of maternal deprivation.

A

Bowlby.

91
Q

How long is the critical period according to Bowlby?

A

The first two-and-a-half years of life.
However, this continues to have a risk until the age of 5.

92
Q

Who studied maternal deprivations impacts on IQ?

A

William Goldfarb.

93
Q

What are the two effects maternal deprivation has on development?

A
  • Intellectual development
  • Emotional development
94
Q

What did Goldfarb find about maternally deprived children?

A

He found lower IQ in children who remained in institutions as opposed to those who were fostered and thus had a higher standard of emotional care.

95
Q

How does maternal deprivation impact emotional development?

A

It can lead to affectionless psychopathy, having an inability to experience guilt or strong emotion towards others.

96
Q

What was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study meant to measure?

A

The link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation.

97
Q

Outline Bowlby’s 44 thieves study.

A

He studied 44 adolescent teenagers accused of stealing.
They were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy.
Their families were also interviewed to establish whether they experienced prolonged early separation from their mothers.

The sample was compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally disturbed adolescents.

98
Q

What did Bowlby find in his 44 thieves study?

A
  • 14/44 thieves could be described as affectionless psychopaths with 12 of these experiencing prolonged separation with their mothers before the age of 2.
  • In contrast, only 4 of the remaining 30 thieves had experienced separations.
  • Only 2 participants in the control group had experienced long term separation.
  • Bowlby concluded that prolonged early separation/deprivation caused affectionless psychopathy.
99
Q

Evaluate Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.

A
  • Flawed evidence
    (Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is flawed because it was him who did it, in addition Goldfarb’s was confounded by other early traumas experienced)
  • Deprivation vs privation
    (Confusion between deprivation and privation is seen here, they failed to distinguish between these and maybe overestimated deprivations impacts)
  • Research support
    (A study on baby rats separated from their mother for a day showed a permanent impact on their social development)
  • Opposing evidence to critical period.
    (Czech twin recovery to be in functional adult relationships meaning harm from this can be reversible and not always inevitable.)
100
Q

Who were the two psychologists who studied Romanian orphan institutionalisation?

A
  • Rutter ERA study.
  • Zeanah BEI study.
101
Q

Outline Rutter’s research into institutionalisation

A
  • Followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans longitudinally as part of the English and Romanian adoptee (ERA) study.
  • He aimed to investigate the extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions
  • He measured PHYSICAL, COGNITIVE and EMOTIONAL development was measured in children aged 4, 6, 11, 15 and 22-25 years old.
  • A group of 52 children from the UK adopted at the same time were used as a control group.
102
Q

What did Rutter find in his ERA study?

A
  • When children first arrived, 1/2 of adoptees displayed signs of delayed intellectual development.
  • At age 11, the adopted children showed differential rates of recovery relating to their age of adoption.
  • Mean IQ of before 6 months: 102
  • Mean IQ of 6M-2Y: 86
  • Mean IQ of 2Y+: 77.
  • These differences remained at age 16.
  • Children adopted after 6 months displayed disinhibited attachment.
103
Q

What is disinhibited attachment?

A

It is an attachment disorder that is characterised by attention seeking symptoms, clinginess and inappropriate social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults (familiar or unfamiliar)

  • Children adopted before 6 months barely showed this.
104
Q

Outline Zeanah’s research into institutionalization.

A
  • Zeanah conducted the Bucharest Early Intervention project which assessed Romanian infants aged 12-31 months who had spent most of their life in institutional care.
  • They were compared to a control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution.
  • Attachment type was measured using the strange situation.
  • Adopters were also asked about unusual social behavior that could indicate disinhibited attachment.
105
Q

What did Zeanah find in his BEI study?

A
  • 74% of the control group were classed as securely attached.
  • Only 19% of the institutional group were classed as securely attached.
  • Disinhibited attachment applied to 44% of those who had lived in institutions (almost HALF!)
106
Q

What are the two effects of institutionalization?

A
  • Disinhibited attachment.
    Being equally friendly and affectionate to strangers and familiars alike.
    This is highly unusual behavior regarding attachment as many children show stranger anxiety.
  • Intellectual disability.
    Institutionalization can impair intellectual development, as seen in Rutter’s study where most children upon arrival displayed signs of this.
107
Q

Why does institutionalization cause disinhibited attachment?

A
  • A child experiencing a high turnover rate of staff, leads to the adaptation of disinhibited attachment
108
Q

Did the institutionalized children show signs of intellectual disability?

A

Yes, in Rutter’s study most children showed symptoms of intellectual impairment when they first arrived.
However, most of those adopted before 6 months had caught up with the control group by age 4.

109
Q

How does the internal working model determine future relationships?

A

The infant’s mental representation of their first attachment serves as a template for future childhood and adult relationships.

For example, a baby whos first experience was of a loving relationship, they will assume that this is how relationships are meant to work in the real world and bring these qualities to future relationships.

110
Q

How do the different attachment types interact in future relationships?

A
  • Secure: seek out functional relationships and behave functionally in them.
  • Avoidant: being uninvolved and struggling with intimacy.
  • Resistant: problems maintaining relationships.
111
Q

Who identified the link between attachment type and future involvement in bullying?

A

Wilson and Smith.

112
Q

How did Wilson and Smith study how early attachment influences child relationships and what did they find?

A
  • Assessed attachment type and bullying behavior in 196 children aged 7-11 from London using standard questionnaires.
  • Secure children were unlikely to be involved
  • Resistant children were most likely to bully.
  • Avoidant children were most likely to be victims.
113
Q

What two things does internal working models effect in adult relationships?

A
  • Romantic relationships
  • Parental relationships
114
Q

Who were the main researchers into the influence of early attachment on later relationships.

A
  • Hazan and Shaver
  • McCarthy
115
Q

Outline Hazan and Shavers study and findings into adult relationship attachment.

A
  • Hazan and Shaver carried out a classic study of the association between attachments and adult relationships.
  • 260 replies to a ‘Love Quiz’ published in a newspaper were analyzed based on their response to questions concerning current relationship, general love experience and personal feelings.
  • 56% of respondents were securely attached
  • 25% were insecure-avoidant
  • 19% were insecure-resistant
  • Those reporting secure attachments were most likely to have good and longer-lasting romantic experiences
  • Avoidant types were more likely to report jealousy and fear of intimacy.

! These findings suggest that patterns of attachment behavior are reflected in romantic relationships.

116
Q

Outline McCarthy’s study into attachment type and later relationships.

A
  • McCarthy studied 40 adult women who had been assessed when they were babies to establish their early attachment type.
  • Those assessed as secure had the best adult friendships
  • Those assessed as avoidant struggled with romantic intimacy
  • Those assessed as resistant had difficulty maintaining friendships.
117
Q

Outline Heidi Bailey’s research into mother-baby attachment.
(Relating to parenting and later relationships)

A
  • Heidi Bailey used the strange situation to assess attachment type in 99 mothers and their one year old babies.
  • The researchers measured the mothers attachment to their own primary attachment figure.
  • They also looked at the attachment type in the babies.
  • It was found that mothers with poor attachment quality to their PAF were more likely to have children with poor attachment quality.
    This supports the internal working model.
118
Q

Evaluate attachments and later relationships

A
  • Research support.
    (Psychologists, from analysis, have concluded that early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional wellbeing and attachment to their own child - showing patterns for future behaviors in these children)
  • Retrospective studies.
    (Most research is not longitudinal, instead being based on questions surrounding relationships to measure attachment. This makes it had to distinguish whether adult or child attachment is being measured and it can be confounded.)
  • Confounding variables.
    (Although some studies do include assessment in infancy, such as McCarthy’s, they do not account for confounding variables such as parenting style and genetics that influence attachments.)
  • Practical application.
    (Understanding the internal working model allows people to have guidance on how to interact with their child to reduce the chance of insecure attachments forming)
119
Q

Evaluate institutionalisation

A
  • Real world application
    (Gives practical advice for institutions to limit the development of insecurity, such as limiting staff turnover)
  • Fewer confounding variables
    (Studies on Romanian orphans contain fewer confounding than studies carried out in the war, limiting pre-existing trauma)
  • Lack of adult data
    (Due to the longitudinal design of the study, there is a lack of data currently into extended long term effects)
  • Unique conditions
    (Studying children from Romanian institutions may introduce other confounding variables due to the exceptional poor quality of care unique to this area, reflecting POOR institutional care as opposed to institutional care alone.)