Ps 388 EXAM 2 Version 2 Flashcards
Does Bull accept Kelsen’s argument?
No, Bull does not accept Kelsen’s argument.
What distinguishes the legal system according to Hart?
Not the presence of a sovereign able to back up rules with a force, but the union of primary and secondary rules.
With whom does Bull agree with?
Bull agrees with H.L.A Hart.
What is a body of rules?
Bind states and other agents in world politics. Considered to have the status of law.
How does Yale School of law define international law?
Law is a social process of authoritative and effective decision-making and does not consist simply of the application of a previously existing body of rules.
Shaped by social, moral, and political considerations as well.
What is Bull’s position on rules of international law?
Bull agrees with Yale that law is a social process. But to assert validity of a rule, of international law is to say that meets test laid down by another rule. Without reference to a body of rules. The idea of law is unintelligible.
What is the difference between primary and secondary rules?
Primary rules are those which require human beings to do or abstain from certain actions, such as keeping promises, or protecting property.
Secondary rules, rules about rules, confer powers on human beings to introduce new primary rules, extinguish or modify old ones, are legislative, excecutive, or judicial.
Do primitive societies have both primary and secondary rules?
No, primary societies only have primary rules.
What are the three defects of primary rules?
- ) defects of uncertainty
- ) defect of static character
- ) defect of inefficiency
What is the remedy for defect of uncertainty? Defect of static character? And defect of inefficiency?
- ) remedy for what Hart calls rules of recognition, which specifies some feature or features, possession of which by a suggested rule is taken as a conclusive, indication that a rule of the group supported by the social pressure it exerts.
- ) rules of change which empower individuals or bodies to introduce new primary rules and eliminate old ones.
- ) rules of adjudication are necessary since there arise in societies disputes, whether or not a particular rule has been violated.
What are Bull’s assertions on the efficacy of international law?
- ) not neccessary to establish an identity between actual and prescribed behavior
- ) question is whether the rules of international law are observed to a sufficient degree. Justify treating them as a substantial factor at work in international politics
- ) no doubt exists substantial degree of coincidence between actual behavior and the behavior prescribed by the rules of international law.
- ) state that is peace exchanges money, is involved constantly in obedience to rules of international law
- 1) when rules are violated, usually takes places agaisnt background of conformity and to other rules of international law
- 2) the distinction between violation of a rule and conformity to it is not always a sharp one.
- 3) even when violation takes place, state usually goes out of its way to be bound by the rules in question
- ) Finally activity of those concern with international law private and public, carried out in dealing that rules of law. Fact that these rules are believed to have status of law, whatever theoretical difficulties it might involved. Makes it possible for international activity, important working of international society.
What are Bull’s States’ Obedience of International law?
- ) the international law of community
- ) result from coercion, or threat of it, by some superior power bent on enforcing the agreement.
- ) the international law of reciprocity.
The modern system of international law is the result of the…
Great political transformation marked from Midddle ages to modern History.
Who was Hugo Grotous?
Original genius, ability to synthesize arguments from other scholars, De tri Belli Act Paris.
Why does Bull argue International Law is primitive?
Because there are no secondary rules.
What does International Law regulate?
- ) treaties and decisions often regulate, in minute detail relations among interstate relations.
- ) Recall Bull, IL not as effective as municipal law
- ) IL= scrupulously observe
- ) to deny flies in the face of all evidence
- ) IL= not as effective in restraining the struggle for power.
- ) decentralized no supernational above distribution of power among them.
What helps International Law? Decentralization
- ) identical or complementary interests of indivual states
- ) the distribution of power among them
What is the Law of Nations says?
Can exist only if there be an equilibrium, a balance of power between Family of Nations. Powers need to keep each other in check.
What are the two consequences of decentralization for International Law?
- ) many matters bearing upon the international relations are not regulated by international law
- ) insecurity and confusion reign.
How does Cart define International law?
- ) International law differs from municipal law of modern states
- ) Law is underdeveloped and not fully integrated community
- ) Lacks three institutions; judicature, executive, and legislature
- ) Law regarded as binding =politics = meeting place for ethics and power.
- ) Legislation is not moral by itself, law is not more moral than politics
- ) law is essential based on politics, legal rules developed in a society. Reflect members who have the most influence.
What is source in international law?
Source does not refer to the actual language of the releveant text. We are not discussing the content of the rule.
Rather we are asking: the forensic process involving where a decision maker or researcher looks to ascertain substative legal rule which governs a legal dispute or academic discourse.
What are the sources of international law?
- ) International convention or another name for treaties. General or particular
- ) International customary law, incredibly important general practice accepted as law.
- ) general principles of law recognized by civilized nations
- ) judicial(domestic, tribunal) decisions and the teachings of the most qualified publicists of the various nationa, as subsidary means from determination of rules of law.
What does Bendetto Comforti argue? What gives any treaty an obligotary character?
Argues customary rules properly are placed at the top of the hierarchy of the international law.
The obligatory character of any treaty rests on a customary rule which is pacta sunt servanda = agreements must be kept.
When can we say/allow that a rule of customary international law has emerged?
It is a two-step process. The emergence of a rule of customary international law.
1.) There must be uniform, consistent, and long-standing state pratice, first in the objective element of customary rule of IL (international law)
What does state practice mean?
- ) Acts taken by states in their diplomatic relations with one another.
- ) acts taken internally (that is doomestically) by states through their legisltaures or courts
- ) acts take by states before international organizations
- ) and even inaction by states when they are confronted with a particular mean
The objective element is necessary, but Does not mean that a customary rule of international law has emerge.
What is the subjective element of customary rule of IL?
Opinio Juris sive necessitais ( an opinion of law or necessity) state recgonized legally binding and not just diplomatic customary. The state recognizing and delcaring that this law uniform state practice is legally binding.
What is ancient usage?
Long standing pratice beginning century ago gradually ripening(mature)
Why do states obey IL?
The international law of power.
Are states bound in IL if legal binding?
No, For as long as the state does not give its opinion juris it’s not bound. The state not bound by that rule.
Can a state object?
- ) Yes, the state must consistently unequivocally object. A state may be an objector, and not grant it’s consent. But state must repeat it’s objection as its required.
- ) objection has to be expressed.
When does POR(period of review?)applied?
- ) only when the customary rules in the process of emerging,
- ) and does not benefit States which came into excistence only after rule matured.
- ) or which became involved in the activity in question only at a later stage
- ) still less can it be invoked by those who existed at the time, but failed to object at that stage
- ) in other words, there is no subsequent objector rule
We have persistent objector rule.
How are international treaties like?
International treaties are very much like contracts in domestic law.
What is a person and how to enter into a legal relationship? What does every single contract do?
- ) Two persons wish to enter into a legal relationship typically conclude a contract.
- ) provides in writing the rights and obligations of the two parties. Create recipriocal rights and obligations.
- ) legal personality. Only entities with legal standing have the ability to negotiate and conclude a legal contract.
- ) contract can be concluded on a number of substantive issues.
What is included in the contract does not entire legal relationship?
There has to be background procedural and substantive rules.
What is the vienna convention law of treaties?
Treaties and agreement between states.
What is state1 opens a consulate in state2, and has property according to IL state law agreement, is it a treaty?
Not a treaty, but governed by international law.
Definition of the Vienna Convention Law of treaties? Six
- ) international agreement
- ) concluded between states
- ) written form
- ) governed by international law
- ) whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments
- ) whatever its particular designation
What does pacta sunt servanda mean?
Agreements must be kept
What is colorable?
Its valid.
What is plenipotentiary?
Power given to authorize and negotiate on behalf of the state. Under IL every head of state and minister.
Lawmaking treaties v. Contractual treaties?
Lawmaking: creates new rules under IL, novel lawmaking provisions. Example UN law of the Sea Treaty governing jurisdiction over oceans.
Contractual: establishes rights and obligations that are already available under international law.
Sets forth terms of contract, and does not create novel provisisons that modify existing state practice.