PPB 1 Flashcards
What is a prevalence study?
How many people have a particular disease
Strengths of cross sectional studies?
Relatively easy and cheap to conductProvide important information on the distribution and burden of exposures and outcomes. This is extremely valuable for health service planning
Weakessess of cross sectional studies?
Only measures prevalent, not incident cases. therefore only limited value for identifying factorsIt can be difficult to establish the time sequence of events
What is a case control study?
Starts with groups with and without a disease and looks back to see who has the exposure in the past. Often used to identify risk factors for disease with long latent period
Strengths of case control study
Quick and relative cheapGood for studying rare diseaseGood for diseases with long latent periods of time between the exposure and outcome
Weakness of case control study
Prone to selection bias, particularly unrepresentative controlsProne to information bias because exposure status is determined after the outcome has occurredCannot establish the sequence of events
What are cohort studies?
Without the disease, measure the exposures (risk factors), and then follow-up over time to see who gets the disease (aetiological research)With a particular disease, measure characteristics, then follow up to see who gets particular outcomes (prognostic research)
What are strengths of a cohort studies?
Exposure (risk factors) or prognostic factors are measured at the start of the study, before the outcome occurs, so measurement is not biased by the presence or absence of the outcomeCan provide data on the time course of the development of the outcomesMultiple outcomes can be examined
What are weaknesses of cohort studies?
Slow and potentially expensiveInefficient for rare diseasesExposure status may change during study (can re-evaluate)differential loss to follow-up may introduce bias
What is selection bias?
Error due to systematic differences in characteristics between those who take part in a study and those who do not, so that those recruited are not representative of the reference population, or the comparison groups are not comparable.
What is information bias?
This is error arising from systematic differences in the accuracy of information collected between comparison groups