Planning Conditions Flashcards
How did you rank the planning conditions in terms of risk?
Ranked the conditions high, medium and low depending on whether they would cause a delay to Clarion receiving the affordable units from Cala as set out in the programme.
When deciding on the ranking I considered:
- The status of the condition in terms of discharge
- When the condition had to be discharged by (pre-occupation, pre-commencement of works above ground level, pre-occupation, post occupation monitoring and discharging)
- The nature of the condition - complex or relatively standard condition and whether there were are third parties who would be required to be involved in discharging the condition.
I presented my presented my ratings of the conditions to the Partnerships director and advised to proceed with the deal.
Can you give some examples of the ranking of the conditions:
Most of the conditions had been discharged, hence they did not present a risk
There were three pre-occupation conditions which included providing a travel plan, plan demonstrating how installation of EVCP and the provision of secure cycle facilities. Given that these were not required to be discharged until pre-occupation and Cala were not yet onsite with construction works and these were relatively standard conditions I deemed these relatively low risk.
There were 3 pre-commencement conditions which the LPA had confirmed via email that they were acceptable and a decision to follow. These conditions included:
- details of surface water sewerage disposal
- topography plans and cross sectional drawings
- lighting scheme
Whilst the LPA had confirmed these were acceptable via email they still had not been formally discharged. I discussed with Cala and they were expecting the decision imminently, therefore I advised these low risk as the exchange was not due to take place for a further 4 weeks so it was likely these would be discharged prior to exchange.
Medium risk
-3 pre-commencement above ground level conditions
- details of refuse stores
- details on how the scheme has been designed to reduce energy demands
- details of materials to be used externally
All submitted not yet approved - pre-commencement above ground level
Cala confirmed they had discussed at pre-app and council were supportive
Technical team reviewed
High risk
1 outstanding pre-commencement condition, which was the construction management plan which was submitted but yet to be approved. Whilst this presented a greater risk as it was a pre-commencement condition and it had been submitted and validated for several weeks and was waiting approval.
Whilst this was a risk as it was not approved, it didn’t require further input from third parties and was a relatively standard condition that had been validated for a significant period of time. Advised that the exchange should proceed as still 3 months out from sos. Development agreement covered programme delays via LADS
Tell me a time where you have reviewed planning conditions?
I worked in the Partnerships team to secure 50 affordable homes from Cala Homes.
Prior to exchange I reviewed the planning conditions associated with the planning permission to determine which had been fully discharged and which were still outstanding, predominately focusing on the pre-commencement conditions.
I liaised with Cala Homes on the status of conditions yet to be discharged and rated them low, medium and high in terms of potential risk.
I presented this to the Partnerships Director and advised that the outstanding conditions did not present a major risk to the deal and to proceed towards exchange of contracts.
Can you give me some examples of the planning conditions attached to the application?
The site was granted outline planning permission, subject to compliance with 29 planning conditions these included:
- Details and drawings
Approval of details of:
- the layout and appearance of the development
- the landscaping of the site,
- and the scale of the development (hereinafter called the “reserved matters”) shall be obtained
from the LPA (no approval)
- Standard time limit condition for commencement of the development
Application for approval of the RM shall be made to the LPA before the expiration of 3 years from outline permission (S92(2) of the T&CPA 1990) however this can be shorter or longer depending on LPA. Lower Haysden it was 2 years.
Development to have begun either before the expiration of 3 years from the date of the outline permission, or before the expiration of 2 years from the date of approval of the last of the RM to be approved, whichever is the later. (S92(2) of the T&CPA 1990)
RM to be in general conformity of the DAS in the outline and plans (illustrative landscape masterplan, proposed access) in the outline (Locality and approved development principles)
- Pre-commencement conditions
No development shall commence until a CEMP detailing management of surrounding habitats in each phase in provided and restricting access to key ecological areas. (safeguard species and protected biodiversity in the local area)
Arrangements for the management of all construction works
- days of the week / hours of construction works will be limited to and
measures to adhered to
- managing all traffic movements associated with the construction works
- parking of contractor’s vehicles within or around the site during construction and storage of external vehicles (order to minimise harm/disruption to the
amenities of local residents)
Details of the proposed means of foul and surface water sewerage disposal have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the LPA. Development will be undertaken in accordance with the approved details
Details of surface water sewage disposal
Topography plans and drawings
- Pre commencement above ground level
Approval of the type of materials to be used
Details of refuse stores
Details of how a scheme has been designed to reduce energy demands - Pre-occupation conditions
Submission and approval in writing by the LPA of a travel Plan, to reduce
dependency on the private car. To include objectives and modal-split targets, a programme of implementation and provision for monitoring, review and improvement. (reduce depedency on private travel and interest of highways safety)
Submission and approval by LPA of detailed scheme to install EVCP. Work to be carried out prior to occupation (encourage use of EV and reduce vehicle emissions in the interest of air quality - NPPF Paragraph 112)
details of a scheme to install electric vehicle
charging points within the development has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning
Authority. The work shall be carried out in strict accordance with those details prior to the
occupation of any of the dwellings within the site
Provision of secure cycle storage facilities
Note: A reason is given to each condition
What are planning conditions?
- Often applied to the grant of planning permission.
- LIMIT and CONTROL the way in which planning permission is IMPLEMENTED.
- Aim to enhance the the QUALITY of development and ENABLE development to proceed where it would have otherwise been refused as planning conditions MITIGATE the adverse effects.
Can you give me an example of some high risk planning conditions?
An LPA may require a bat emergent survey to take place as part of a pre-commencement condition which can only take place for certain times of the year (May to September)
If archeological works are required to be done pre-commencement, then delays to programme are out of the developers control as it is hard to know what is underground until excavation begins
What section of the NPPF covers the tests for planning conditions and what are they?
Paragraph 56 (NPPF):
- Planning conditions need to be kept to a minimum
They must only be imposed where they are - Necessary
- Relevant to planning and development to be permitted
- Enforceable
- Precise
- Reasonable in all other aspects
Any pre-commencement conditions should be avoided unless there is clear justification
What paragraph of the NPPF covers the tests for planning conditions?
NPPF paragraph 56
How can the LPA and applicant reduce the need for planning conditions?
- Rigorous application of the tests
- Early engagement
- Pre-application meetings
- Planning performance agreement - timescales for discussions to take place
- Seek approval at application stage for matters which may otherwise have been subject to conditions
When should planning conditions not be used?
- Conditions that do not meet the planning conditions tests
- Conditions that would cause unreasonable impact on the delivery of a development (unjustifiable and large financial burden) - fail test 3
- Conditions requiring compliance with regulatory requirements such as Building Regulations
- Conditions reserving outline application details which have already been submitted with the outline application
- Conditions requiring the development to be carried out in its entirety
- Conditions requiring land to be given up
What is a Grampian Condition?
prohibits development authorized by the planning permission or aspects linked to the permission until a specified action has been taken
Can planning conditions be used to modify plans and details submitted within an application?
If detail / lack of detail is unacceptable in planning terms , best course of action is to revise the application. If it involves significant changes, may need a new application.
How should local planning authorities order conditions on decision notices?
Precise drafting and clear conditions will help ensure they are understood.
Good practice to list in the order the need to be satisficed. A good structure is:
1. Standard time limit condition for commencement of development
2. Details and drawings subject to which the planning permission is granted
3. Pre-commencement conditions
4. Pre-occupation conditions
5. Any conditions related to post occupancy monitoring and management
How should conditions be used to specify the time limit within which a development granted planning permission should begin?
Development must being not later than the expiration of:
1. Three years beginning from the date the permission is granted
2. Another period (longer or shorter) that the LPA imposes
Longer - complex, large-scale project, 3 years to SoS is not enough time
Shorter - so housing development is implemented in a timely manner
What conditions can be attached to reserved matters applications?
Only those directly related to those reserved matters. Any conditions other than the matters to be reserved can only be imposed when outline permission is granted.
How long should a RMA be made once outline planning permission has been granted?
Before the expiry of two years from the date of the permission