Performance Appraisal Systems Flashcards
What are the rationales for implementing effective performance appraisals?
- Legal
- Communicative
- Productivity of labor
- Equity in rewards
- Other managerial functions
- Financial positions
Effective Performance Appraisal: Legal
- Make sure employee got fired for their own actions and not a discrimination issue
- If employee’s performance not documented well, company can lose money it lawsuit if claim that was filed mentioned discrimination
Effective Performance Appraisal: Communicative
- Ensures understanding of performance expectations by managers and staff
- Provides a formal means for employees to voice concerns and make suggestions for system improvement
- Indicates management’s commitment to open dialogue and fairness
Effective Performance Appraisal: Productivity of labor
- Provides direction to employees on how to improve
- Establishes an environment conducive to self-motivation
- Assists employees with career planning
- Promotes satisfaction and elicits commitment of employees
- Mitigates turnover
Effective Performance Appraisal: Equity in rewards
- Provides a means for accurate and equitable distribution of organizational rewards
- Provides recognition for past service
- Cannot be arbitrary or perceived as arbitrary
Effective Performance Appraisal: Other managerial functions
- Supplies evidence to review organizational and systems problems
- Provides data on recruitment and selection procedures
- Identifies deficiencies in orientation and training programs
Effective Performance Appraisal: Financial positions
- Reducing operating costs
- Avoids costly litigation
- Reduces replacement costs
What are the types of appraisal systems?
- Absolute
- Relative
- Outcome oriented
What does absolute systems consists of?
- Require the manager/rater to indicate whether or not the employee is meeting a set of predetermined criteria for performance
- Usually involves some sort of scale or index
- Most commonly used performance appraisal system
Advantages of absolute systems
- Inherent feedback generation
- More specific for indicating importance of various responsibilities and behaviors
- Considered more objective, quantifiable, and legally defensible
Disadvantages of absolute systems
- Rater insufficiencies, such as central tendency, leniency, and halo effect
- More burdensome and time‐consuming
What are the absolute methods?
- Essay
- Critical incident
- Checklist
- Graphic rating
- Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)
- 360° feedback
- Forced choice
Essay
- Absolute method
- Advantages: may provide rich data
- Disadvantages: differences across raters, lack of objectivity
- Rater prepares a written statement describing the employee’s strengths and areas for improvement
Critical Incident
- Absolute method
- Advantages: Derived from documented data, Good for implementation of progressive discipline
- Disadvantages: Burdensome, Subject to interpretation, May not capture all information, May be more sensitive toward particularly good or poor employees
- Rater maintains a record of incidents indicative of both positive and negative behaviors of the employee
Checklist
- Absolute method
- easy to complete but doesn’t give chance for good feedback
- Advantages: Easy to complete, Indicative of specific behaviors
- Disadvantages: Less precision, Less conducive to feedback
- Rater answers with a “yes” or a “no” to a series of questions about the employee’s behavior
Graphic rating
- Absolute method
- Advantages: Often based on trait measures, Great for feedback, Lends well toward quantification
- Disadvantages: Leniency, Central tendency, Use of traits, Must come up with appropriate intervals in spacing and description, Must derive appropriate criterion items
- Rater indicates various employee traits and behaviors on a scale; like how we do class evals
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
- Absolute method
- Advantages: Designed specifically to measure behaviors on the job, Quantitative, Conducive to supplying feedback
- Disadvantages: Central tendency, Labor‐intensive to create
- Rater uses highly descriptive scales to indicate employee’s tendency to demonstrate desirable behaviors; ex. points are assigned to a description
360° Feedback/Multi‐rater
- Absolute method
- Advantages: Multiple points of view, Reduces impact of bias from one rater, Excellent for feedback, Facilitates reflection
- Disadvantages: Very time‐consuming, Subject to role conflict
- Employees rate themselves, and comparisons are made with ratings by various stakeholders
Forced Choice
- Absolute method
- Advantages: Mitigates bias
- Disadvantages: Irksome to raters, Usually takes a HR specialist to score, or at least special training to do so, Feedback is challenging
- Rater ranks a set of weighted statements describing the employee’s performance
Relative Systems
Rater makes comparisons among employees
What are the methods for relative systems?
- Alternation ranking
- Paired comparisons
- Forced distribution
Alternation ranking
- Relative method
- Select most and least valued employee from remaining pool of employees
Paired comparisons
- Relative method
- Each employee is compared with every other employee one at a time
Forced distribution
- Relative method
- Categorize employees into one of “x” groups based on tendency to meet expectations