PBN.3.4 PBN Components – Navigation Applications Flashcards
To what does PBN Components - Aviation Applications refer?
Application of a Nav Spec and the supporting NAVAID infrastructure to specific routes, procedures and/or defined airspace volumes
En-Route Navigation:
Where are track accuracy and system functionalities detailed?
What will the European mandates require over the next decade?
In each Nav Spec
- RNAV 5 on the en-route ATS route structure
- RNAV 1 as a minimum for SIDs, STARs and transitions
- RNP APCH for each instrument runway end (IRE)
En-route segments:
How is the turn performance of the acft determined?
By the waypint definitio (Fly-by, Fly-over or FRT) as well as the altitude, acft speed, angle of turn, and wind
What does FRT capability provide in a turn?
Better and more repeatable turn performance
What type of turn is recommended to guarantee predictable and highly repeatable flightpaths when turning?
What’s the industry’s standard document that provides this recommended turn?
FRT
DO236C/ED75D
What are the recommended values of FRT values?
22.5 NM above FL200
15 NM below FL195
What should be noted about FRT functionality?
Only available on modern acft and not all acft can execute this type of turn
What are the benefits or introducing RNAV or RNP applications in en-route?
It may enable a reduction in spacing between routes
What is the requirement to achieve this?
Guaranteed highly repeatability of track keeping, especially in turns
Where are FRT expected to be recommended?
To support closely spaced routes with turns
What major factors will influence any decision on separation minima and route spacing?
Navigation:
- PBN: Nav Aplicatoin, Nav Spec, Navaid infrastructure
Exposure to risk:
- Route configuration
- Operational Error
- Traffic density
Intervention:
- Communication
- Surveillance
- ATC procedures and tools
Separation Minima
For tactical use, without ATC Surveillance: influenced by:
- Navigation
- Exposure to risk
For tactical use, with ATC Surveillance: influenced by,
- Internvention
Route Spacing
Without ATC Surveillance, influenced by:
- Navigation
- Exposure to risk
With ATC Surveillance, influenced by
- Nav
- Exp. to risk
- Intervention
What are some of the main benefits of PBN in en-route?
- Reduced need to develop and maintain sensor-specific routes and procedures, and their associated costs
- More efficient use of airspace
- Additional routes and improved route placement
- Reduced bottlenecks
- More predictable operations:
- advance planning to support continuous descent operations
- Environmental mitigation:
- More fuel efficient and shorter routes (reduced emissions)
- Noise and visual abatement (tranquility issues)
Terminal Airspace Navigation
What do the European mandates require?
Minimum of RNAV 1 for SIDs, STARs and transitions
RNP 1 with RF is encouraged - required for the PCP IR airports in AF#1
RNP APCH required at every instrument runway end (IRE)
Standard Instrument Departures
What’s the benefit of using RNAV in a SID?
No need to overfly NAVAIDs
Shorter track miles can be provided
More efficient use of airspace and fuel
What will happen if prior to take-off, acft has only DME/DME positioning, and sufficient DMEs are not in view?
Position updating will not be possible
Acft will another source of guidance (GPS, radar vector, IRU or Dead Reckoning) until it can acquire DME/DME position update
How can the acft’s position be fixed at the end of the runway before the take-off roll?
If appropriate functionality is fitted, for example, TOGA button
On what is the lateral position relative to the runway centreline dependent?
On any cross-wind on initial climb
What’s very important to take into account for the inital legs? Who must be aware of this?
The choice of Path Terminator.
Procedure Designers
What are some Path Terminators?
CA
CF
CD
VA
VI
FM
HA
TD
VM
What’s CA best suited for?
What does CA control?
Best suited to RNAV 1 departures
CA controls drift in cross winds
CA, CF or CA DF can be flown by all RNAV 1 capable aircraft
In what situations is VA used?
Parallel departures following a heading (not a track)
What’s the difference between VA and CA?
Va is steeper than CA
Standard Instrument Arrivals
What are they used for?
Provide highly repeatable routes for better separation and sequencing, and to reduce track miles
There is no requirement to route via the NAVAID
What are the two methods to terminate RNAV STARs?
Closed STARs:
- Uninterrpted RNAV nominal track to the final approach segment of the relevant instrument approach
- Acft and crew know track miles to touch down
- Preferred STAR for airspace users as they can accurately manage their vertical profile
- Local implementation could define extended downward segments, including multiple waypoints for tactical sequencing purposes
Open STARs:
- Publication of an RNAV nominal track up to a waypoint, such as a metering Fix or a downwind waypoint, followed by ATC vectors to final approach
- Preferred STAR for ATC as the ATCOs can manage the sequencing on final approach.
- Without distance to go to touchdown, pilots will find it very difficult to manage the optimum vertical profile
Approach
What are the two historical types of approach?
PA and NPA
PA: provide lateral and vertical guidance based on an ILS
NPA: only lateral guidance from a conventional NAVAID