parliament - restraints on p law making Flashcards
s15 conny act
affirms parliaments full power to make laws
AG v Taylor shows
shows the supremacy of the crown in parliament is a fundamental part of our constitution but all three branches are sovereign in their sphere of influence yet codependent
although parliament is supreme, what are some constraints of this
1 statutory ‘hard law’
2. soft law
3. political and moral
what sections come under statutory ‘hard law’ constraints and what acts are they from
and a case
s16 conny act
s268 electoral act
Ngaronoa v AG
what does s16 conny act entail
- bill must have royal assent before becoming legislation
- if gg refused bill would not become legislation
what is a fact regarding the royal assent
the gg has never rejected a royal assent but is is given as a form of conventionw
what does s268 electoral act entail
certain entrenched provisions require a super majority 75% to change
what is the ethical question regarding s268 electoral act
whether past parliament should be able to constrain that of parliament today as it become less democratic but protects the public from a tryannical rule
Ngaronoa v AG - hard law e.g.
facts
- Taylor challenging the process in which a bill was passed regarding voting to prisoners
ISSUE
Ngaronoa v AG - hard law e.g.
issue
that the decision was in breach of entrenched s268 of the electoral act regarding who can vote
HELD
Ngaronoa v AG - hard law e.g.
held
- entrenchment only referred to the voting AGE and doesn’t guarantee the right to vote generally
what is the key takeaway from Ngaronoa v AG - hard law e.g.
that a court may strike down legislation if it doesn’t comply with statutory constraint such as s268, although this is inconclusive
what are soft law constriction examples - cases included
- standing orders
- pickin v British railways board
- LDAC
- AG and NZBORA s7 reports
- kiwi party v Ag
what are soft law constriction examples - cases included
- standing orders
these are parliaments internal rules establish by the house and enforced by the speakers
standing orders are not …
enforceable and therefor non-justiciable
what does the idea that standing orders are not justifiable reflect
the principle of comity that parliament has its own sphere of authority that the judiciary shouldn’t interfere with