maori structure Flashcards

1
Q

maori tow jr appliaction

A
  1. is there a treaty incorpertaing principle
    - yes, limited way act
    - no, still need to act in respect to indigenous rights (tt)
  2. how stringly is the provision worded
    - weak = imposes negative obliagtions
    - strong = is not exhaustive unless p expresses this (tt)
  3. what principles are engaged
    - redress
    - active protection
    - partnership
    - consultation
  4. what is the jr ground
    - illegailty (improper purpose/illegality)
    - procedural impropreity (natural justice)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

normative process
justice whata method derived from the take utu ea process

A
  1. what is the facts
  2. what is the cause of the dispute, violation of tikanga
  3. who is effected - structural and perscriptive
  4. what responsibilties at play - relational, resonsibilty
  5. what kawa may resolve the issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

strctural

A

whakapapa - est connection w matter
whenuangatanga - dictates tikanga differs across hapu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

perscriptive

A

utu - is there an imblanace that needs redressing
ea- how to acheive balnce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

relational

A

mana - has someones mana been effected
tapu - integirty effected/ restrictions improper (place)
noa - retsrctions improper ( lift)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

responsiblity

A

what respobsibilties are req
kaitikitanga - natural world
manaakitanga - people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

kawa

A

deliberation
- korero
- hui
- runanga
- hou hou i te rongo
restriction
- place tapu to place restriction
- whakanoa to life restrcition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

te pou matakana case

A

no to vaccination records vague
- jr as MOH needs to appreciate tikanga and principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

nwo case

A

presumption of legailty
- presumption of inclusion unless specifically expressed
no iwi fights involved in
not all cases are justiciable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wairapa moana v mercury

A
  • mana whenua not absoloute - taku whenua - mana w give to peeps w/o mana w

SHOWS THAT TIKANGA IS NOT RIDGID E.G in claw back cases WT is well placed to determine menaing of tikanga

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

clawback why and where

A

why
- to ensure tranfers of land (to soe) dont breach TOW principles
where
- soe act 1986, 27-27d

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

te heu heu

A

orthodox and outdated position that treaty doesnt have legal effect if not incorperated into domestic law or relevat statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

non legal effects of the treaty

A
  1. LDAC
  2. TREATY SETTLEMENT
    - guided by red book
    - subject to state rights and tikanga
    - power from third souce
    - redress
  3. CABINET CIRCULAR
    - internal memo created by cab
    - guidline 4 policy developm + implement
    - set Q for decsion maker 2 consider for articles of TOW
  4. WT
    - est tow act 1975 - as repsonse to tow breaches
    - reco non binding unless crown —> soe
    - invest
    - claims abt crown
    - DL refer to TOW
    - determine menaing TOW, not bind on court tho
  5. general
    - constituionally importnat
  6. moral obliagtion
    - suvject 2 debate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly