executive - the rule of law x the exec Flashcards
the rule of law is
one of the most significant constitutional pillars of NZ
what are the two main aspects of the rule of law
- the executive is bound by the law just like everyone else
- the executive needs legal authority to act
the rule of law functions as
a form of legal accountability that the executive has to parliament
what is the foundational case for the rule of law
entick v carrington
entick v carrington
facts
a member of the executive branch gave permission for carington to search enticks home under no legal power, as he was committing crimes against the govt
entick v carrington
issue
entick sued for trespass as carringtons power that was given to him was given under no such legal power
entick v carrington
held
there was no statute or common law proceeding conferring legal right on the minster to grant the warrant
what was the rule that was enforced in entick v carrington
enforced the rule that the executive may only exercise power if she power is conferred to it through statute or common law so they are very much subject to the rule of law
Webster v police facts
Webster called police for help after fighting with son, w pushes police when they get on to his property, w charged with assaulting a p/o IN THE LAWFUL EXECUTION OF HIS DUTY
Webster v police ISSUE
was the police officer acting lawfully when entering Websters property
Webster v police held
the police were found to be trespassing as the constable didnt have a warrant or common law right to enter the property and so charges against Webster was dropped
what was the key takeaways in Webster v police
another key example of the courts enforcing the rule of law on the executive/polic
Fitzgerald v muldoon facts
M campaigned to end the incumbent Labour government’s compulsory superannuation payments. After winning, M issued a press release stating that individuals who stopped making contributions would not be prosecuted, even before legislation was enacted to formalize this change.
Fitzgerald v muldoon issue
m press release in fact suspended laws. stopped people abiding by the law is it came from the pm, without having the authority to do so
Fitzgerald v muldoon held
m actions were unlawful, pm cannot suspend the law w/o authority from parliament