PA 60 – Meaning of infringement Flashcards

1
Q

What does S60 concern

A

the meaning of infringement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must a patent be to be infringed

A

S60(1)
A person infringes a PATENT if, WHILE IT IS IN FORCE,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are direct infringement acts for a product

A

S60(1) a)
make, offer to dispose, dispose, use, import or keep the product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are direct infringement acts for a process

A

S60(1)
b) USE it or OFFER for use IN THE UK when it is KNOWN of would be OBVIOUS that it would infringe to do so;
c) offer to dispose, dispose, use, import or keep any product obtained DIRECTLY by the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the requirements for indirect or contributory infringement

A

S60(2)
SUPPLY or OFFER to supply
IN THE UK
an UNAUTHORISED party
with MEANS RELATING TO AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT of the invention,
if the person KNOWS or it would be OBVIOUS that those means are suitable for AND intended for putting the invention into effect IN THE UK

(3) UNLESS the means is a STAPLE COMERCIAL PRODUCT, and is NOT used to INDUCE infringement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are exemptions to infringement

A

S60(5)
a) private, non-commercial acts (e.g. private individuals)
b) experimental purposes relating to the subject matter of the invention
c) a medicine prepared in a pharmacy in response to a prescription
d) use for the needs to a ship temporarily in UK waters
e) use in an aircraft/vehicle temporarily in the UK
f) certain except aircraft lawfully in the UK, and their parts and accessories
g) farm use: propagating the product of a harvest on own holding
h) farm use: breeding livestock
i) human or veterinary health trials for market authorisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which exemptions do not apply for indirect infringement

A

S60(6)
Under a) private, non-commercial acts (e.g. private individuals)
b) experimental purposes relating to the subject matter of the invention
c) a medicine prepared in a pharmacy in response to a prescription

EXCEPT for
a) persons supplying the crown
b) persons supplying prior inventors or pre-restoration/instalment rights holder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Are there any restrictions on exemptions

A

S60
(6A) schedule A1 contains restrictions on farm propagation and provisions for when it is invoked
(6B) breeding of livestock uses include making an animal or animal reproductive material available for the farmer’s agricultural activity BUT NOT sale for commercial reproductive activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Where must ships, aircraft, vehicles etc be registered to be exempt from infringing

A

S60(7)
they must be registered OUTSIDE THE UK

(i.e. not: registered in the UK ,or not yet registered anywhere)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Where is the onus of proof for infringement

A

Always with the patentee except in the case of a process producing a new product, where the existence of the product causes a presumption of infringement (reversal of burden of proof S100

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is considered as a patented product

A

i) the patented product
ii) a DIRECT result of a patented process, or
iii) a product to which a (relevant) patented process has been applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what patented process may be applied to a product to make it a patented product?

A

courts construe as being a process that results in some alteration to the product - must have a non-trivial new property as a result of the process. This should be UNIQUE and TESTABLE

NO subsequent process should be applied which results in some alteration of the product

merely delivering cars in a patented lorry will not make the cars patented BUT applying a patented rust-proof treatment ay result in the cars being a patented product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

is there a de minimus principle in infringement

A

in principal, no,
but it will affect considerations of damage and equitable remedies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does “disposal” cover

A

it is broader that merely selling,
it encompasses giving a product away in a promotion or as a sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does offering to dispose cover

A

NOT merely listing or stocking a product which is instead an “invitation to treat” - but could still get an injunction against this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does keep not imply

A

more than being a custodian (i.e. keeping for stock)
which is instead keeping in preparation / readiness to perform one of the other acts

17
Q

When can infringement by importation apply

A

if there has been no exhaustion of rights (i.e. if the imported product had not already been sold with the proprietors consent in another EEA country)

18
Q

What is the double territoriality requirement for indirect infringement

A

that the SUPPLY AND RECIPIENT are IN THE UK

19
Q

Does a double territoriality requirement always apply for indirect infringement

A

No, OFFER to SUPPLY IN THE UK, as this is normally unilateral, it can only be tested for being in he UK

20
Q

What should an offer to supply be

A

it should have a “flavour of a negotiation” so simply providing information about a product (e.g. data sheets or technical specifications) are not offers to supply.
An advert with a price, or providing means to begin a process of acquisition would be an offer to supply

21
Q

Who are unauthorised parties

A

a consumer who bought a patented product will be classified as an authorised party (Nestec Nespresso pods)
so machine-consumable parts be likely not automatically fall under S60(2)

22
Q

What should you consider regarding knowledge and intent

A

that the law is in flux, so if a question is clear that it exists, say so, but if not , discuss both sides.

23
Q

What should S60(2) infringement be called

A

indirect or secondary infringement
as no primary infringement is actually needed, so contributory is misleading.

24
Q

How do you check if the “induced infringement” criteria for secondary infringement is met

A

check against direct infringement requirements, as the induced infringement should be a primary infringement under S60(1)

25
Q

What classifies something as a staple commercial product

A

the item has at least one other legitimate use

26
Q

What does non commercial mean for being exempt from infringement

A

it means immediately non-commercial , i.e. not to sell the product or charge for a service incorporating the process

27
Q

What experiments are / not exempt

A

experiments can ultimately have commercial purpose for e.g. improving a business, but cannot be mere demonstrations or comparison experiments for third parties as those have the purpose of generating revenue, or experiments to test the market

experiments with a scientific or technical goal are generally allowed, but those with marketing or sales are not

28
Q

What is the territorial scope of S60

A

the UK, isle of Man, and territorial waters

29
Q

Where must directly infringing acts take place

A

within the territorial scope of S60, so the channel islands are not part of this

30
Q

What should be considered for determining who has potentially infringed

A

where the title of ownership has occurred, i.e. overseas or in the UK. If manufactured aboard, who actually did the importing. Consider other parties for joint tortfeasors if they act beyond normal seller/buyer relationship

31
Q

What does the offer to supply section of S60(2) allow for

A

allows for interim injunctions to prevent the double territorial act from actually being performed.

32
Q

What can be a defence for a would be infinger

A

consent of an implied licence from the proprietor

33
Q

How can consent or an implied licence occur

A

can be indirect (e.g. via a licence) or indirect, so consent may be express of implied,
implied licenses to repair will come from the purchase of a product, within limits

34
Q

What can implied consent lead to

A

estoppel

35
Q

Who has the onus of proof for establishing consent in infringement proceedings

A

A DEFENDENT

36
Q

How should a core element of the invention be interpreted for working out whether repair is allowable or not

A

the core element is typically the part which confers its value and inventiveness

37
Q

What should you do if you are unsure if an act is an invitation to treat or an offer to dispose

A

advise purchasing the product to provide evidence of infringement

38
Q

What is the test for infringement by means of equivalence in the UK

A

1) Does the variant achieve substantially the same result in substantially the same way as the invention, i.e. the inventive concept revealed by the patent?

2) Would it be obvious to the person skilled in the art, reading the patent at the priority date, that it does so in substantially the same way as the invention?

3) Would such a reader of the patent have concluded that the patentee nonetheless intended that strict compliance with the literal meaning of the relevant claim(s) of the patent was an essential requirement of the invention?

39
Q

What can you do if you are concerned about infringement

A

1) perform an FTO search (if it is non-specific)
2) consider a declaration of non-infringement (S71 - for a specific patent / competitor)