P4; CH1: Hierarchy of norms Flashcards
What is the Acquis?
It’s a term used to describe the Corpus Iuris of the Union, that is the set of sources like TREATIES, PROTOCOLS, AGREEMENTS, PRINCIPLES, ACTS, LEGISLATIVE and SOFT LAW INSTRUMENTS.
Is there a deadline to complete the Acquis?
No, EU has unlimited time to pursue its objectives
Which are the 2 parts of EU law that don’t fall in the category of the Acquis and Why?
- CFSP/CSDP INSTRUMENTS because they are too specific to be reduced
- INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS, since they are under MEMBER STATES’ Competence but influnce the Union
What indicates that the Acquis evolved in a Hierarchy of norms?
- The violation of the Treaties implies invalidity of the act (and implicates a hierarchy)
- Binding effect of international treaties over secondary law (implicates a hierarchy)
- Legislative instruments limit the validity of delegated acts (and implicates a hierarchy)
- RULE OF LAW PRINCIPLE -> Primacy of the law
- CASE LAW OF THE ECJ: imposing limits and powers, clarifying hierarchies
What composes Primary Law?
TREATIES AND PROTOCOLS
+ GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW anchored by the Court in art. 263 TEU
Art. 263 TEU
Da fare
Are Treaties and Protocols constitutional?
No, they resembles a sort of constitutional form in common values and fundamental principles.
2004 Failure shows that EU does not have a Constitution
Relationship between the two primary law treaties
TEU and TFEU have the same legal value and are together at the apex of the Union’s legal system
Relationship between the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the two primary law treaties
CHARTER, TFEU and TEU have the same legal value (art. 6 TEU, after Lisbon reform)
3 important points about the Charter of Fundamental Rights
- Difficult to modify even with the TREATY REVISION PROCEDURE
- PRIMARY NORMS can modify it but not in pejus (modify can only expand individual’s guarantees)
- It states Common Values of the Union, that together with Fundamental Rights reconstructs a constitutional framework between Union and Citizens
The intermediate category
It’s important in cases in which secondary law is allowed by TREATIES to modify/integrate primary law
UNDER PRIMARY LAW, ABOVE SECONDARY LAW
Example of Intermediate category applying
ART.81 TFEU -> The Council determines family law provisions with cross-border implications using ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE if the National Parliaments do not oppose
International Agreements
Are concluded in the framework of the Union’s external competences. If they enter into force they become part of the Union’s legal order.
They must be adopted:
- OBSERVING International Law
- RESPECTING the UN Charter
UNDER PRIMARY LAW, ABOVE SECONDARY LAW
How’s Secondary Law divided and what are the differences?
Secondary law is divided in:
1. Legislative Acts (subjected to subsidiarity control of national parliaments and made after a proposal of the Commission)
Can be made with ORDINARY or SPECIAL proceduree
- Non-Legislative Acts (Delegated acts + Implementing acts = Third tier sources of law: they make legislative acts operational)
Secondary Law LEGISLATIVE ACTS: difference between ORDINARY PROCEDURE ACTS and SPECIAL PROCEDURE ACTS
ORDINARY PROCEDURE ACTS:
Parliament and Council are both joint and equal legislators
SPECIAL PROCEDURE ACTS:
It is chosen either the Parliament or the Council should legislate (Usually the Council, representing Govs.)
——
- Same legal value
- Different political value