Operational Planning Flashcards
RVR detection types:
The RVR visibility readout values from an instrument located in the touchdown zone is called -
The RVR visibility readout values obtained from an instrument located midfield of the runway.
The RVR visibility readout values obtained from an instrument located nearest the rollout end of the runway.
TDZ
MID
Rollout
Explain the difference between MDA/H and DA/H -
MDA/H is relevant to a non-precision approach and is the minimum altitude an aircraft can descent to and remain level until the missed approach point(MAPt)
The DA/H is relevant to a precision approach. There is no level flight involved, an aircraft flies a constant descent until reaching the DA/H, which is the missed approach point, from which it must follow the missed approach procedure if unable to land.
For take-off alternate, destination, en route alternate and destination alternates the weather forecast must cover a period from -
one hour before to one hour after the ETA.
Take-off minima without take-off alternate:
The basic rule is that an aircraft can take-off provided that, in the event of an emergency, it can -
Therefor, the take-off minima may be governed by the -
Land again at the same aerodrome and commence the instrument approach procedure.
Landing minima
If the prevailing conditions are below the landing minima of the current aerodrome the aircraft may not take-off, since it will not be able to conduct the instrument procedure in order to land during an emergency. In this case the aircraft will need a -
Alternate take-off aerodrome
Take-off minima with take-off alternate:
(4) the take-off alternate aerodrome shall be located within the following time from the aerodrome of departure:
(a) __ minutes flying time from the departure aerodrome in the case of _____-engined aeroplanes
(b) For aeroplanes with __ engines, _ hour of flight time at an all engine cruising speed(one-engine cruising speed according to aeroversity), determined from the aircraft flight manual, calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the _____ take-off mass; or
(c) for aeroplanes with _ or more engines, _ hours of flight time at an all engine cruising speed (one-engine inoperative cruising speed according to aeroversity), determined from the from the aircraft flight manual, calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the actual take-off mass;
(d) for aeroplanes engaged in extended diversion time operations (EDTO) where an alternate aerodrome meeting the ________ criteria of sub regulations (b) or (c) is not available, the first ________ alternate aerodrome located within the ________ of the operator’s approved maximum diversion time considering the actual take-off mass;
(e) for an aerodrome to be selected as a take-off alternate the available information shall indicate that, at the _________ time of use, the ________ will be at or above the operator’s established aerodrome operating ______ for that operation; and
(f) en-route alternate aerodrome, required by sub-regulation 91.07.7(4) for extended diversion time operations by aeroplanes with two turbine engines, shall be selected and specified in the ATS flight plan.
Take-off minima with take-off alternate:
(4) the take-off alternate aerodrome shall be located within the following time from the aerodrome of departure -
(a) 20 minutes flying time from the departure aerodrome in the case of single-engined aeroplanes
(b) For aeroplanes with two engines, 1 hour of flight time at an all engine cruising speed, determined from the aircraft flight manual, calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the actual take-off mass; or
(c) for aeroplanes with 3 or more engines, 2 hours of flight time at an all engine cruising speed, determined from the from the aircraft flight manual, calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the actual take-off mass;
(d) for aeroplanes engaged in extended diversion time operations (EDTO) where an alternate aerodrome meeting the distance criteria of sub regulations (b) or (c) is not available, the first available alternate aerodrome located within the distance of the operator’s approved maximum diversion time considering the actual take-off mass;
(e) for an aerodrome to be selected as a take-off alternate the available information shall indicate that, at the estimated time of use, the conditions will be at or above the operator’s established aerodrome operating minima for that operation; and
(f) en-route alternate aerodrome, required by sub-regulation 91.07.7(4) for extended diversion time operations by aeroplanes with two turbine engines, shall be selected and specified in the ATS flight plan.
How is the aircraft category determined relevant to an approach chart?
Vso at maximum landing mass x 1.3
CATS 91.97.5 Aerodrome Operating Minima:
- Take-off Minima:
(1) GENERAL
(a) Take-off minima established by an owner or operator must be expressed as visibility or RVR limits, taking into account all relevant factors for each aerodrome planned to be used and the aeroplane characteristics. Where there is a specific need to see and avoid obstacles on departure and/or for a forced landing, additional conditions(e.g ceiling) must be specified.
(b) The pilot-in-command may __ commence take-off unless the weather ________ at the aerodrome of departure are equal to or better than applicable _____ for landing at that aerodrome unless a suitable take-off ________ aerodrome is available.
(c) when the reported meteorological visibility is below that required for take-off and RVR is not reported, a take-off may only be commenced if the pilot-in-command can _________ that the RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or better than the required _______.
(d) When no reported meteorological visibility or RVR is available, a take-off may only be ___________ if the pilot-in-command can determine that the RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or better than the required minimum.
CATS 91.97.5 Aerodrome Operating Minima:
- Take-off Minima:
(1) GENERAL
(a) Take-off minima established by an owner or operator must be expressed as visibility or RVR limits, taking into account all relevant factors for each aerodrome planned to be used and the aeroplane characteristics. Where there is a specific need to see and avoid obstacles on departure and/or for a forced landing, additional conditions(e.g ceiling) must be specified.
(b) The pilot-in-command may not commence take-off unless the weather conditions at the aerodrome of departure are equal to or better than applicable minima for landing at that aerodrome unless a suitable take-off alternate aerodrome is available.
(c) when the reported meteorological visibility is below that required for take-off and RVR is not reported, a take-off may only be commenced if the pilot-in-command can determine that the RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or better than the required minimum.
(d) When no reported meteorological visibility or RVR is available, a take-off may only be commenced if the pilot-in-command can determine that the RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or better than the required minimum.
CATS 91.97.5 Aerodrome Operating Minima:
- Take-off Minima:
(3) REQUIRED RVR/VISIBILITY:
(a) For _____-engined aircraft, the take-off minima established by an owner or operator shall be expressed as RVR/visibility values not lower than ___m
(b) ____-engined aircraft whose performance is such that, in the event of a critical power unit failure at any point during take-off, the aeroplane can either stop or continue the take-off to a height of _____ft above the aerodrome while clearing obstacles by the required ______, the take-off minima established by an owner or operator must be expressed as RVR/Visibility not lower than the minima prescribed in figure 2-2, of this section unless approved by the Director for lower minima as provided in -
(i) for ______ aviation operators Part 91; and
(ii) for _________ operators, Parts 121, 127 and 135 as applicable.
(c) For ____-engine aircraft whose performance is such that they cannot comply with the performance conditions in paragraph (3) (b) above in the event of a critical power unit failure, the take-off minima established by an operator must be expressed as RvR/visibility values not lower than ___m. Such aircraft may be permitted minima as low as ___m: provided the owner or operator submits for the approval of the Director -
(i) an alternate means to demonstrate that adequate obstacle clearance can be maintained; or
(ii) procedures that would ensure obstacle clearance during each departure.
FIGURE 2-2:
Facilities vs RVR/visibility:
RVR/Visibility for NIL:
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge lighting/or centreline:
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge and centreline lighting:
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge and centreline lighting and multiple RVR information:
(a) For single-engined aircraft, the take-off minima established by an owner or operator shall be expressed as RVR/visibility values not lower than 800m
(b) Multi-engined aircraft whose performance is such that, in the event of a critical power unit failure at any point during take-off, the aeroplane can either stop or continue the take-off to a height of 1 500ft above the aerodrome while clearing obstacles by the required margins, the take-off minima established by an owner or operator must be expressed as RVR/Visibility not lower than the minima prescribed in figure 2-2, of this section unless approved by the Director for lower minima as provided in -
(i) for general aviation operators Part 91; and
(ii) for commercial operators, Parts 121, 127 and 135 as applicable.
(c) For multi-engine aircraft whose performance is such that they cannot comply with the performance conditions in paragraph (3) (b) above in the event of a critical power unit failure, the take-off minima established by an operator must be expressed as RvR/visibility values not lower than 800m. Such aircraft may be permitted minima as low as 400m: provided the owner or operator submits for the approval of the Director -
(i) an alternate means to demonstrate that adequate obstacle clearance can be maintained; or
(ii) procedures that would ensure obstacle clearance during each departure.
FIGURE 2-2:
Facilities vs RVR/visibility:
RVR/Visibility for NIL: 500m
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge lighting/or centreline: 250/300m
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge and centreline lighting: 200/250m
RVR/Visibility for Runway edge and centreline lighting and multiple RVR information: 150/200m
Aerodrome Operating Minima:
- Non-Precision Approach:
(2) Minimum descent height(MDH)
An operator must ensure that the minimum descent height for a non-precision approach is not lower than either -
(a) the ___/___ for the category of aeroplane;
(b) the ______ minimum; or
(c) the height as determined for specific or defined CDFA, if applicable
(2) Minimum descent height(MDH)
An operator must ensure that the minimum descent height for a non-precision approach is not lower than either -
(a) the OCA/OCH for the category of aeroplane;
(b) the system minimum; or
(c) the height as determined for specific or defined CDFA, if applicable
Take-off Minima:
- Non-Precision Approach
(3) Visual reference
A pilot may not continue an approach below MDA/MDH unless at least one of the following visual references for the intended runway is distinctly visible and identifiable to the pilot:
(a) elements of the ________ light system;
(b) the _______
(c) the _______ markings;
(d) the _______ lights;
(e) the _______ identification ____;
(f) the ____ glide ____ indicator;
(g) the _________ zone or _________ zone markings;
(h) the _________ zone lights;
(i) the _______ edge lights; or
(j) other visual references accepted by the Director.
(a) elements of the approach light system;
(b) the threshold
(c) the threshold markings;
(d) the threshold lights;
(e) the threshold identification lights;
(f) the visual glide slope indicator;
(g) the touchdown zone or touchdown zone markings;
(h) the touchdown zone lights;
(i) the runway edge lights; or
(j) other visual references accepted by the Director.
Take-off Minima:
System minima for a non-precision approach:
(a) An operator must ensure that system minima for non-precision approach procedures, which are based upon the use of ILS without glide path, VOR, VOR/DME and NDB are not lower than the MD?H values given in figure 2-3 below:
Note: The MDH may be higher, and usually is, than the system minima. The system minima is the lowest possible legal MDH for a non-precision approach.
ILS LOC -
VOR -
VOR/DME -
NDB -
Lowest MDH
250
300
250
300
Take-off Minima:
Precision Approach - Cat 1 operations
(1) General
A category 1 operation is a precision instrument approach procedure which provides for an approach to a decision height not lower than ___ft and a visibility not less than ___m or RVR not less than ___m.
(1) General
A category 1 operation is a precision instrument approach procedure which provides for an approach to a decision height not lower than 200ft and a visibility not less than 800m or RVR not less than 550m.
System Minima:
Precision approach - Category 2 operations
(1) General:
(a) A category 2 operation is an ILS approach procedures which provides for an approach to a decision height lower than ___ feet but not lower than ___ feet and a RVR of not less than ___m.
(b) the approval of the _______ is required
(1) General:
(a) A category 2 operation is an ILS approach procedures which provides for an approach to a decision height lower than 200 feet but not lower than 100 feet and a RVR of not less than 300m.
(b) the approval of the director is required
Aerodrome Operating Minima:
Precision approach - Category 2 operations
(3) Visual reference
A pilot may not continue an approach below the cat 2 DH determined accordance with paragraph (2) above, unless visual references containing a segment of at least _ consecutive ____ being the centre line of the ________ lights, _________ zone lights, runway _____ ___ lights, runway ____ lights or a combination of these is attained and can be maintained. This visual reference must include a lateral element of the ground pattern, i.e. an approach lighting ______ or the landing _______ or a barrette of the _________ zone lighting.
(3) Visual reference
A pilot may not continue an approach below the cat 2 DH determined accordance with paragraph (2) above, unless visual references containing a segment of at least 3 consecutive lights being the centre line of the approach lights, touchdown zone lights, runway centre line lights, runway edge lights or a combination of these is attained and can be maintained. This visual reference must include a lateral element of the ground pattern, i.e. an approach lighting crossbar or the landing threshold or a barrette of the touchdown zone lighting.