neophiliac views of new media Flashcards
what is the neophiliac perspective
believe media is beneficial to society
- increases consumer choice
- created an E-Commerce revolution
- revitalises democracy
- created a globalised culture
increased consumer choice
convergence and interactivity - increased consumer choice
- hundreds of entertainment channels
pluralist neophiliacs - competition between this diversity of media will improve the quality of media output
user-generated sites eg blogger - enables ordinary people to offer advice and make criticisms
increase consumer choice eval
limitations
- cultural pessimists - negative side effects to increased consumer choice eg companies sell products and services on internet engage in consumer surveillance - companies can track data on customers - target them to enhance profits
- 2018 cambridge analytica - facebook collects data on individuals and sold information to political parties so targeted for political adverts
e-commerce revolution
internet has led to a revolution in e-commerce - e-retailers such as amazon and ebay have been great economic successes and undermined high-street sales
nearly all major commercial companies have own websites
e-commerce trend has resulted in more choice for consumers - increases competition and lower prices
postmodernism and pluralism
e-commerce revolution eval
marxists - commercialisation of the internet, smartphones and digital TV - claim that it encourages materialism and consumerism and false needs - furthers capitalist domination and control
revitalising democracy
new media - opportunities for people to acquire the education and information required to play an active role in democratic societies
- communicating information that giant corporations who on and control world’s media are unlikely to report
Seaton - many believe internet is advancing progressive politics - internet is rejuvenating civil society, generating political activism
eg Corbyn - 2017 - youthquake
gives voice to people - like-minded people can join together
Massberger et al - ability to participate in society online essential for fully democratic society
revitalising democracy eval
limitations
- global digital divide - global poor have little access to the internet so they do not benefit from greater participation in democracy - those that benefit most have least access
- number of governments have suppressed freedom of expression in new media - eg china
- increasing ownership of internet companies - increasing control over content
globalised culture
postmodernist neophiliacs - new media contributing to social diversity - enabling people to share in globalised culture
enabled people to expand personal boundaries and new channels for interactions
can enhance social capital - re-establishing lost contacts
new media helps to facilitate cultural globalisation
globalised culture eval
limitations
- marxists - global and class divide in the usage of the new media - primarily western countries who benefit from this globalised culture
- cultural pessimists - globalisation is just a form of cultural imperialism