Minority Influence & Social change Flashcards
Minority influence
Refers to the type of social influence where individuals reject established majority group norms.
Achieved through the process of conversion
Conversion
The process where the majority gradually adopt a new minority view point or behaviour. This new belief or behaviour becomes accepted both publicly and privately
Types of Internalisation.
Happens through ISI
What are the following factors involved in minority influence?
Consistency
Commitment
Flexibility
Consistency
A minority must be consistent in its position. Not only must individuals in the minority maintain their belief and attitude over time, but there must be consistency between members or a minority group. This will give the majority a signal that the minority is committed to its position
eg Wood et al (1994)
Commitment
The important process as it suggest CERTAINTY, CONFIDENCE and COURAGE in the face of a hostile majority.
Augmentation principle
Greater commitment may then persuade majority group members to convert to the minority position.
Flexibility
As minorities are typically powerless compared to the majority, they must negotiate their position with the majority rather than try to enforce it.
Mugny (1982)
Snowball Effect
Overtime, increasing numbers of people switch to minority position. The more this happens, the faster the rate of conversion. Gradually the minority view become the majority
Maas et al. (1982)
Identification
Found that a homosexual minority arguing for homosexual rights were less persuasive at changing the majority heterosexual position than a heterosexual minority.
Moscovici et al. (1969)
observed consistent and inconsistent behavioural styles on minority influence in a colour study.
Moscovici et al. (1969) - Procedure
- Laboratory experiment.
- 192 female participants.
- The women were split into groups of six with two confederates per group. There was one control group with no confederates.
- Groups were asked to identify the colour of 36 slides. All were different shades of blue.
- The consistent confederates identified all 36 slides as green.
- The inconsistent confederates identified 12 slides as blue and the other 24 as green.
Moscovici et al. (1969) - Findings
Groups with consistent confederates - 32% of natural participants identified at least one slide as green. Around 8% of the time, participants identified slides as green.
Groups with inconsistent confederates - around 1% of the time, participants identified slides as green.
Control group - around 0.25% of the time, participants identified slides as green.
Moscovici et al. (1969) - Conclusion
Minority groups had more influence when they behaved consistently rather than inconsistently.
Control group
A group that is treated normally and gives us a measure of how people behave when they are not exposed to the experimental treatment (e.g. allowed to sleep normally).
Moscovici et al. (1969) - Analysis
Pros
Pros:
Control group result - proves that the minority groups had influence.