Mental illness in the criminal justice system Flashcards
actus reus
wrongful deed
Mens rea
Criminal intent
unfit to stand trial
refers to an inability to conduct a defense at any stage of the proceedings on account of a person’s mental disorder
R v. Balliram
unfit person cannot cannot be sentenced
R v. Pritchard
criteria for fitness to stand trial
- defendant is mute of malice (intentionality)
- defendant can plead to the indictment
- defendant has sufficient cognitive capacity to understand trial proceedings
Bill C-30
a) understand nature or object of proceedings
b) understand possible consequences
c) communicate with counsel (R v. Taylor)
Length of time defendant can be held in custody for fitness evaluation
- 5 days, with extension max 30 days and total length should not exceed 0 days
R v. Taylor
ability to communicate with counsel
- need only be able to state facts relating to offence that would allow appropriate defense
- need not be able to communicate facts that are their best interests
Fitness evaluations when raised, stats
at any time of proceedings by defense or crown
- > 5000 a year
- 42% of unfit have evaluation
- 61% have evaluation
- 24% unfit and NCR evaluations
Fitness Instruments
long psychiatric facility stays unnecessary to determine fitness
- FIT-R
- Competency screening test
- compentency to stand trial assessment instrument (CAI)
- interdisciplinary fitness interview (IFI)
- MacArthur competence assessment tool- criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA)
Fitness interview Test revised (FIT-R)
semi structured interview and interview other people for a baseline
- nature of proceedings
- consequence of proceedings
- ability to communicate with counsel
- 3 point scale (0 = no impairment)
fitness to stand trial procedure
fitness evaluation
- fit or unfit
- if unfit attempt to restore fitness: medication = reassessed within 45 days
- majority restored within 6 months
- if still unfit: detention or conditional discharge within 90 days
- annual review by review board
- prima facie every 2 years: continue to provide sufficient evidence to proceed with trial (evidence lost or witness moves etc)
Prima facie
case in which the crown prosecutor must prove there is sufficient evidence to bring the case to trial
pirelli, gottdiener, Zapf
- more incompetent’s have mental disorders
- more likely to be unemployed and unmarried
- competent more likely to have current violent criminal charge than non-violent
demographics of unfit/fit
fit - married
unfit - older females in minority group and single
US
- incompetent less likely to maintain employment and more severe mental illness
- African American more likely to be found incompetent
- incompetent more likely to have property or miscellaneous crimes
restoring fitness
treatment:
psychotropic medications - most common
or Tx programs to increase understanding of legal process and address problems that hinder ability to participate in defense - mixed research
Review:
- accused fitness every year
- sufficient case evidence every 2 years
Jackson v. Indiana
defendant should not be held for more than reasonable period to determine if they are competent (fit)
Starson v. Swayze
ruled can refuse medical treatment if understand the consequences
- when deteriorated mother became decision maker
R v. Demers
scc- unconstitutional to exercise continued state of control over someone who will never be fit to stand trial if they are no significant threat to society
- absolute discharge
Bill C-10
court can stay proceedings if:
- accused is unlikely to ever become fit
- accused does not pose significant threat to public safety
- stay of proceedings is in interests of the proper administration of justice