memory - eyewitness testimonies: misleading information. Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is meant by “eyewitness testimony”?

A

Legal term referring to an account given by people of an event they have witnessed such as accidents and crimes they have observed themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by “misleading information”?

A

Incorrect information given to an eyewitness usually after the event which distorts what people remember about the event which can be done through leading questions and post-event discussion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by “leading questions”?

A

Questions that are phrased in a certain way to suggest a particular answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is meant by “post-event discussion”?

A

Occurs when there is more than one witness to an event where witnesses may discuss what they have seen with other co-witnesses or other people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What experiments research leading questions and when?

A
  • Loftus and Palmer’s experiment 1 in 1974.
  • Loftus and Palmer’s experiment 2 in 1974.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 1?

A

Examine effect of leading questions on the accuracy of eyewitness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 1?

A
  1. 45 students were shown short video clips of car accidents.
    1. all were asked “how fast was the car going when they … each other?”
      1. each group was given a different verb to fill in the blank
        ↳ e.g. of words used were smashed, collided, bumped, hit or contacted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the findings of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 1?

A

When word smashed was used – 40.8mph - participants estimated the cars were travelling much faster than when the verb contacted was used – 31.8mph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the conclusion of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 1?

A

Accuracy of EWT can be affected by leading questions and that a single word has the potential to significantly distort accuracy of judgements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 2?

A

Examine effect of leading questions on the accuracy of eyewitness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 2?

A
  1. 150 student participants were shown a short film that showed a multi-vehicle car accident.
    1. asked questions about it.
      1. split into 3 groups with 50 in each group.
        1. one group was asked: “how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
          1. second was asked: “how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?”
            1. third was not asked about the speed of the vehicles as they were the control group.
              1. one week later all participants returned and were asked: “did you see any broken glass?”
                1. there was no broken glass in the film.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the findings of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 2?

A

Verb used in original questions influenced whether the participants thought they had sen broken glass where the critical verb altered their memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the conclusion of Loftus and Palmer’s leading questions experiment 2?

A

Leading questions can have distorting effect on EWT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why do leading questions affect EWT?

A
  • response bias
    ↳ person’s schema for the verb influences their answer.
    ➝ leading questions does not affect their memory but choice of answer.
  • substitution
    ↳ memory has been imagined and they genuinely believe these changes therefore the leading question actually distorts memory.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the problem with post-event discussion?

A

Combines (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What experiment researches post-event discussion and when?

A

Gabbert et al’s in 2003.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the aim of Gabbert et al’s PED experiment?

A

Examine effect of post-event discussion affected accuracy of EWT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the procedure of Gabbert et al’s PED experiment?

A
  1. 60 students from a university and 60 adults from the local community.
    1. each participant watched a video from a crime scene but filmed from different points of view.
      1. either tested individually (control group) or in pairs (co-witness group).
        1. those in co-witness group were told that they had watched the same video however they had seen different perspectives of the same crime.
          1. completed a recall test testing their memory of the event.
19
Q

What are the findings of Gabbert et al’s PED experiment?

A
  • 71% of participants recalled aspects of the film that they hadn’t seen but picked up in discussion.
  • in control group 0% recalled information they hadn’t seen.
20
Q

What is the conclusion of Gabbert et al’s PED experiment?

A

Suggests witnesses often go along with each other known as witness conformity.

21
Q

Why does PED affect EWT?

A
  • memory contamination
    ↳ memories become altered or distorted because they combine information from other witnesses with their own memories.
  • memory conformity
    ↳ witnesses go along with each other to win social approval or because they think others are right.
22
Q

What is a strength of misleading information?

A
  • useful real-life application.
23
Q

What are the weaknesses of misleading information?

A
  • evidence against substitution.
  • demand characteristics.
  • tasks are artificial.
24
Q

What is the evaluation of misleading information - useful real-life application?

A

POINT - one strength is the practical importance it has played in the real world.
EVIDENCE - Loftus (1975) found leading questions can have a distorting effect on memory. Recent DNA exoneration cases have confirmed warnings of relying on eyewitnesses. Mistaken eyewitness identification was the largest factor contributing to the conviction of innocent people (Wells and Olson, 2003).
EXPLANATION - criminal justice system relies on eyewitness testimonies when prosecuting and investigating criminals therefore police are informed to not use leading questions as they can distort their account of the crime or accident.
LINK - helps reduce number of wrongful convictions and improve the criminal justice system.

25
Q

What is the evaluation of misleading information - evidence against substitution?

A

POINT - one weakness is that EWT is more accurate for some aspects of an event tan for others.
EVIDENCE - Sutherland and Hayne (2001) showed a video clip to participants where they were then asked leading questions. Recall was more accurate for central details of the event than for peripheral ones.
EXPLANATION - shows that participants paid more attention on central features of event and these memories were relatively resistant to misleading information.
LINK - suggests original memories for central details survived and were not distorted which was an outcome not predicted by substitution explanation.

26
Q

What is the evaluation of misleading information - demand characteristics?

A

POINT - one weakness is demand characteristics.
EVIDENCE - Zaragosa and McCloskey (1989) argue many answers participants give in lab studies of EWT are as result of demand characteristics. Participants do not want to let researcher down so when questions is asked they may answer with yes so questions appears more helpful.
EXPLANATION - leading questions imply the participants needs to say a certain answer. My try meet researcher’s expectations.
LINK - internal validity decreases as they are no longer measuring accuracy of EWT.

27
Q

What is the evaluation of misleading information - tasks are artificial?

A

POINT - one weakness is the heavy reliance on artificial tasks.
EVIDENCE - Loftus and Palmer’s research procedure involved participants watching film clips of a car accident.
EXPLANATION - not a reflection of witnessing crime or accidents in real life. Real-life crime or accidents are more emotionally arousing which could affect the accuracy of EWT.
LINK - lack external validity as it cannot help explain how leading questions may influence the accuracy of EWT on real life events.

28
Q

What is the evaluation point of misleading information - useful real-life application?

A

One strength is the practical importance it has played in the real world.

29
Q

What is the evaluation evidence of misleading information - useful real-life application?

A
  • Loftus (1975) found leading questions can have a distorting effect on memory.
  • recent DNA exoneration cases have confirmed warnings of relying on eyewitnesses.
  • mistaken eyewitness identification was the largest factor contributing to the conviction of innocent people (Wells and Olson, 2003).
30
Q

What is the evaluation explanation of misleading information - useful real-life application?

A

Criminal justice system relies on eyewitness testimonies when prosecuting and investigating criminals therefore police are informed to not use leading questions as they can distort their account of the crime or accident.

31
Q

What is the evaluation link of misleading information - useful real-life application?

A

Helps reduce number of wrongful convictions and improve the criminal justice system.

32
Q

What is the evaluation point of misleading information - evidence against substitution?

A

One weakness is that EWT is more accurate for some aspects of an event tan for others.

33
Q

What is the evaluation evidence of misleading information - evidence against substitution?

A
  • Sutherland and Hayne (2001) showed a video clip to participants where they were then asked leading questions.
  • recall was more accurate for central details of the event than for peripheral ones.
34
Q

What is the evaluation explanation of misleading information - evidence against substitution?

A

Shows that participants paid more attention on central features of event and these memories were relatively resistant to misleading information.

35
Q

What is the evaluation link of misleading information - evidence against substitution?

A

Suggests original memories for central details survived and were not distorted which was an outcome not predicted by substitution explanation.

36
Q

What is the evaluation point of misleading information - demand characteristics?

A

One weakness is demand characteristics.

37
Q

What is the evaluation evidence of misleading information - demand characteristics?

A
  • Zaragosa and McCloskey (1989) argue many answers participants give in lab studies of EWT are as result of demand characteristics.
  • participants do not want to let researcher down so when questions is asked they may answer with yes so questions appears more helpful.
38
Q

What is the evaluation explanation of misleading information - demand characteristics?

A
  • leading questions imply the participants needs to say a certain answer.
  • may try meet researcher’s expectations.
39
Q

What is the evaluation link of misleading information - demand characteristics?

A

Internal validity decreases as they are no longer measuring accuracy of EWT.

40
Q

What is the evaluation point of misleading information - tasks are artificial?

A

One weakness is the heavy reliance on artificial tasks.

41
Q

What is the evaluation evidence of misleading information - tasks are artificial?

A

Loftus and Palmer’s research procedure involved participants watching film clips of a car accident.

42
Q

What is the evaluation explanation of misleading information - tasks are artificial?

A
  • not a reflection of witnessing crime or accidents in real life.
  • real-life crime or accidents are more emotionally arousing which could affect the accuracy of EWT.
43
Q

What is the evaluation link of misleading information - tasks are artificial?

A

Lack external validity as it cannot help explain how leading questions may influence the accuracy of EWT on real life events.