Memory Ao1 Only Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the coding of STM and LTM and how did the researcher find it?

A

Baddeley
STM = acoustic
LTM = semantic
- Immediate recall worse with acoustic, recall after 20 minutes worse with semantic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the capacity of the STM?

A

1) Jacob:
- Researcher recalls digits until they can’t be recalled correctly. 9.3 numbers, 7.3 letters on average.

2) Miller:
- Span of 7+/-2 = improved by chunking. (7 is magic number).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the duration of the STM and LTM?

A

1) STM:
Petersen and Petersen
- 24 students given consonant syllables to remember and 3 digit number to count backwards from. 80% after 3s, 3% after 18s.

2) LTM:
Bahrick et al:
- American participants ages 17-74 face recognition and free recall of high school photos. 48 years after = 70% in photo recognition, free recall much less (30%) accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 types of LTM?

A

1) Episodic memory:
- Memories of events that are complex and time-stamped. Require conscious recall.

2) Semantic memory:
- Knowledge of the world (combination of encyclopaedia and dictionary). Not time-stamped and less personal. Everyone can get this knowledge.

3) Procedural memory:
- Stores memories for actions and skills. Recall without awareness or effort. Become automatic with practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who made the Multi-Store model of memory?

A

Atkinson and Shiffrin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MSM model
How does stimuli pass into the sensory register, and what is the:
- Duration
- Capacity
- Coding
(of the SR)

How does SR pass info onto the STM?

A

Passes into SR using our senses.
1) less than 0.5s
2) High
3) Modality specific

By attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MSM model
What is the:
- Duration
- Capacity
- Coding
(of the STM)

And how does it pass info on to the LTM?

A

1) 18s (unless rehearsed)
2) 5-9 items
3) Acoustic

Prolonged rehearsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the:
- Duration
- Capacity
- Coding
(of the LTM)

A

1) Up to a lifetime
2) Unlimited
3) Semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who made the STM Working Memory Model?

A

Baddeley and Hitch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the Central Executive do?

A

Supervisory role:
- Allocates subsystems tasks and has a very limited capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What comes under the Phonological Loop, and what do they do?

A

Deals with auditory information:

1) Articulatory process:
- Allows rehearsal to keep sounds (words) in WM while needed.

2) Phonological store:
- Stores words you hear

Capacity is two seconds of speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the system that deals with visual information in the WMM.

A

The Visuo-spatial sketchpad:

1) Visual cache:
- Stores visual data

2) Inner scribe:
- Records arrangement of objects in vision.

Capacity is three or four objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What connects the CE and the LTM in the WMM and what does it do?

A

Episodic buffer:

Integrates data from other stores, maintains sense of time sequencing and links to the LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is interference?

A

Interference forgetting occurs when two pieces of information disrupt each other and we cant get access to them even though they are in the LTM store.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two types of interference?

A

1) Proactive interference:
- Old memories disrupting new ones.
2) Retroactive interference:
- New memories disrupting old ones.

Interference is worse when memories are similar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe McGeoch and McDonald’s (1931) study

A

Procedure:
- Participants memorised a list of words.
- Then given a new list to learn.
- 6 groups (one was control) so 5 different/ new lists, e.g. antonyms, synonyms.
- Recall of second list measured

Findings:
- Most similar material (synonyms) produced the worst recall.

17
Q

Describe retrieval failure

A

Cues are stored at the same time as memory, cannot access memory without cue.

Encoding Specificity Principle:
- Forgetting occurs if cues at coding and retrieval are different.

There are meaningful links (STM = Short Term Memory) and unhelpful ones:
- Context-dependant
- State-dependant

18
Q

Who conducted the procedure to test context-dependant forgetting and what was the procedure?

A

Godden and Baddeley:

  • Divers learned list of words, recalled the same words in same/ different context (land/water).
  • Recall was 40% lower when context for learning and recall were different.
19
Q

Who conducted the procedure to test state-dependant forgetting and what was the procedure?

A

Carter and Cassaday:

  • Participants learned and recalled list of words when on drug/ not on drug (antihistamine).
  • Recall was poorest when internal states at learning and recall were different.
20
Q

What are the two types of consequences come from leading questions?

A

1) Response-bias
- Influences kind of answer given.

2) Substitution
- Interference with eyewitness memory; distorting accuracy.

21
Q

Who conducted the study on leading questions and what did it involve?

A

Loftus and Palmer

Procedure:
- 45 participants watched clips of car accidents.
- Each asked ‘how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’
- 5 groups, all had a different verb e.g contacted, smashed.

Findings:
- Contacted produced a response of 31.8mph.
- Smashed produced a response of 40.5mph

22
Q

What are the two possible consequences of discussing an event after it happened?

A

1) Memory contamination:
- Mixing of memories with others.
2) Memory conformity:
- Go along with others for social approval (NSI or ISI).

23
Q

Who conducted the study on post-event discussion and what did it involve?

A

Gabbert et al.

Procedure:
- Paired participants watched a videoed crime, but each saw different elements (angles) of the video.
- Both discussed it, after watching it, then individually recalled.

Findings:
- 71% recalled aspects of the event that they did not see but had from a PED.
- Control group with no discussion had no errors.

24
Q

Describe Johnson and Scott’s research into EWT anxiety effect.

A

Johnson and Scott

Procedure:
- Participants sat in a waiting room, and heard an argument where one person immerged.
1) Low-anxiety situation:
- A man comes through with pen.
2) High-anxiety situation:
- Heated argument, followed by someone holding a knife with blood on it.

Findings:
- 49% of participants in low anxiety identified him successfully and 33% of participants in high anxiety.
- Tunnel theory suggests focus on the knife (object of most stress) so weapon focus not person.

Anxiety may have a NEGATIVE effect.

25
Q

Describe Yuille and Cutshall’s research into the effect of anxiety on EWT.

A

Yuille and Cutshall

Procedure:
- Real-life crime, where the thief was shot dead.
- 21 witnesses, 13 agreed to participate.
- Participants interviewed 4-5 months after incident.

Findings:
- Very accurate, little change after 5 months for main aspects.
- Participants who reported the highest levels of stress were most accurate.
- 88% compared to 75% for the least-stressed witnesses.

Anxiety may have a POSITIVE effect.

26
Q

Who came up with the Inverted-U theory and what is it?

A

Yerkes and Dodson:
- The relationship between arousal and performance is an inverted U.

Deffenbacher:
- Reviewed 21 EWT studies and found optimum levels of anxiety produces best recall.

27
Q

Describe the cognitive interview.

A

CI is based on the psychological understanding of memory and has its origins in the cognitive approach. Devised by Fisher and Geiselman. Rapport established using four techniques.

1) Report everything:
- Recall every detail even trivial, could be cue to more recall.

2) Reinstate the context:
- Mentally return to original scene, acts as a context-dependant cue.

3) Reverse the order:
- Recall events backwards to avoid effect of expectation and reduces dishonesty.

4) Change the perspective:
- Recall from another persons point of view, reduces effect of schema on recall.

Enhanced cognitive interview (ECI):
- Fisher et al. developed additional elements. Reduce EW anxiety, open questions and speaking slowly.