Attachment Ao1 Only Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Early interactions…..

A

Are Meaningful!!!
- From early ages interactions are meaningful with the quality of these interactions associated with successful development of attachment.
- Two kinds:
1) Reciprocity
2) Interactional synchrony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reciprocity?

A

When baby and caregiver take turns responding to and elicit response from each other. Like a dance.

Alert phases:
Feldman and Eidelman
- Babies time to seek interaction. Mothers respond successfully 2/3 times. From three months interaction is more intense and reciprocal.

Babies have active role:
- Traditional views see baby as entirely passive. But they take active role and can initiate interaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

Babies and caregivers are synchronised when they carry out the same action simultaneously.
- Synchrony = “The temporal coordination of microlevel social behaviour”

Meltzoff and Moore
- Beginnings of interactional synchrony can be seen in babies two weeks old.

Isabella et al.
- Good levels of synchrony are associated with good quality of attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the role of the father?

A

1) Attachment to fathers:
Schaffer and Emerson
- Mother is mostly the first attachment. Some babies attach to both at same time. Most form secondary attachment with father.

2) Distinctive role for fathers:
Grossman et al.
- Attachment between mother and baby important in teen attachment and relationships.
- Quality of father’s play also related to teen attachments.

3) Fathers can be the primary attachment figure:
Field
- When fathers are PAF they adopt behaviours more typical of mothers. Attachment is not due to the gender but the level of responsiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Outline the role of the father, attachment to fathers (part 1).

A

1) Attachment to fathers:
Schaffer and Emerson
- 3% of cases the father was primary attachment.
- 27% joint with mother.
- By 18 months 75% of babies formed attachment with fathers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline the role of the father, distinctive role for fathers (part 2).

A

2) Distinctive role for fathers:
Grossman et al.
- Longitudinal study concluded attachment between mother and baby more crucial in teen attachment and relationships.
- Quality of father’s play also related to teen attachments. Father is there for play and mother for care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the role of the father, primary attachment figure (part 3).

A

3) Fathers can be the primary attachment figure:
Field
- When fathers are PAF they adopt behaviours more typical of mothers. Often have better interactional synchrony than secondary-caregiver fathers.
- Key attachment is not the gender but the level of responsiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are Schaffer’s four stages of attachment? Mention them in order.

A

1) Asocial stage:
(first few weeks)
- Same behaviour towards objects and humans.

2) Indiscriminate attachment: (2-7 months)
- Preference for humans; no one is favoured; no stranger/separation anxiety.

3) Specific attachment:
(About 7 months)
- Stranger and separation anxiety when separated from one particular adult.

4) Multiple attachments:
(By 12 months)
- Secondary attachment formed within a month 24% of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure and findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?

A

Procedure:
- 60 Glasgow babies
- Visited at home monthly for a year and at 18 months.
- Separation and stranger anxiety observed by child’s mother.

Findings:
- Babies developed attachment through the outlined stages.
- Baby’s primary attachment was to those who had the best reciprocity with them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe Lorenz’s procedure and findings.

A

Procedure:
- Large clutch of eggs divided in two.
- Half saw biological mother within hours of attachment.
- Half saw Lorenz.
- Mixed the ducklings to see who they would follow and also viewed their courtship behaviour.

Findings:
- Ducklings followed who they saw first.
- Critical period of a few hours; after that no attachment is formed.
- Sexual imprinting occurs from a template of desirable characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe Harlow’s procedure
and findings.

A

Procedure:
- 16 rhesus monkeys.
- (Condition 1) Plain-wire monkey with milk.
- (Condition 2) Cloth covered but no milk.
- Reactions to frightening situations were measured.
- Continued observation into adulthood.

Findings:
- Babies preferred cloth covered mothers.
- When frightened, babies went to the cloth mother.
- Monkeys suffered severe consequences in future: more aggression, killing offspring, less skill mating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe Dollard and Miller (1950)’s learning theory of attachment?

A

Importance of food in attachment (cupboard love).

1) Classical conditioning:
- Food is UCS that produces feeling of pleasure UCR.
- Caregiver is NS but when associated with food becomes CS. CS produces pleasure CR and so baby associates mother with pleasure from food. Attachment formed.

2) Operant conditioning:
- Crying reinforced because it produces caregiver response.
- Negative reinforcement as caregiver response stops crying.

Drive reduction:
- Attachment is secondary drive learned by association of caregiver with hunger satisfaction. Hunger is primary drive to reduce hunger drive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline Bowlby’s theory of attachment.

A

Attachment is innate for survival and comes from evolution. Young animals stay close to parents for protection.

Monotropic = One primary care-giver
- In Bowlby’s theory a “mother figure”.

1) Law of continuity = constant care means better quality attachment.
2) Law of accumulated separation = effects of separation add up.

Babies have social releasers/ innate “cute behaviours”.

A critical period (sensitive period) up to 2 years for attachment to take place.

The first attachment creates an internal working model of relationships in later life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline the intent behind, and categories of, the strange situation.

A

Ainsworth and Bell developed the controlled observation to asses the quality of attachment between baby and caregiver.

Five categories to judge attachment quality:
1) Proximity seeking
2) Exploration and secure base behaviour
3) Stranger anxiety
4) Separation anxiety
5) Response to reunion with caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the procedure of the strange situation.

A

Seven episodes in the procedure each lasting three minutes:
1) Baby encouraged to explore by CG
2) Stranger enters and approaches baby
3) CG leaves
4) CG returns and stranger leaves
5) CG leaves baby alone
6) Stranger returns
7) CG returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the three attachments the strange situation identified?

A

A = Insecure-avoidant

B = Secure

C = Insecure-resistant

17
Q

Outline insecure-avoidant attachment findings.

A

A = Insecure-avoidant
- 20-25% British kids.
- Explore freely: don’t seek proximity.
- Little/no separation and stranger anxiety.
- Don’t require comfort on reunion.

18
Q

Outline secure attachment findings.

A

B = Secure attachment
- 60-75% of British kids.
- Happy to explore, but sought proximity.
- Moderate separation and stranger anxiety.
- Requires and accepts comfort on reunion.

19
Q

Outline insecure-resistant attachment findings.

A

C = Insecure-resistant
- 3% British kids.
- Explores less, seeks more proximity.
- Considerable separation and stranger anxiety.
- Resists comfort at reunion.

20
Q

Describe the procedure and findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis.

A

Procedure:
- Difference in 3 attachment types across 8 countries and within them - meta analysis.
- 32 studies in total, just under 2000 kids.

Findings:
- Secure attachment most common type across the board ranging from 50% in China, 75% in Britain.
- Insecure-resistant rates higher than Ainsworth predicted in collectivist samples.
- Variations between countries lower than within; up to 150% difference.

21
Q

Describe the procedure and findings of Simonelli et al.

A

Procedure:
- 76 babies aged 12 months assessed using strange situation. All in Italy.

Findings:
- 50% secure and 36% insecure-avoidant. Possibly from mothers working long hours and use of more childcare services rather than direct care.

22
Q

Describe the procedure and findings of Jin et al.

A

Procedure:
- Compared the attachment types of 87 Korean babies to proportions in other studies.

Findings:
- Found similar patterns of secure and insecure attachment to other studies - but only one baby type A. Similar results to japan.

23
Q

Outline Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.

A

Continuous and consistent care is essential.
- Separation may lead to maternal deprivation.

Separation is different from deprivation.
- Separation = child is not physically in the presence of PCG.

  • Deprivation = loss of quality emotional care as a result of separation.

Critical period of 2.5 years. If extended separation occurs, there is risk of psychological damage.

Maternal deprivation leads to:
- Lower IQ
- Emotionless psychopathy - inability to experience guilt or strong emotion.

24
Q

Describe the procedure and findings of the 44 thieves study.

A

Procedure:
- 44 delinquent teenagers accused of stealing.
- Family interviews establishing any prolonged separation from mothers.
- Thieves interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy.

Findings:
- 14/44 affectionless psychopaths, 12 of them experienced prolonged separation during the first two years.
- Only 5 of remaining thirty experienced prolonged separation.

25
Q

Describe Rutter et al.’s Romanian orphan study procedure and the findings.

A

Procedure:
- 165 Romanian orphans adopted in the UK, 52 British adoptees as a control.
- Physical, cognitive and emotional development assessed at different stages in life.

Findings:
- Children adopted before age 6 months had a mean IQ of 102 at age 11.
- Children adopted after 2 years had mean IQ of 77 at age 11.
- Sensitive period, no attachment before 6 months has long-term effects (disinhibited attachment).

26
Q

Describe Zeanah et al.’s procedure and findings regarding the Romanian orphans.

A

Procedure:
- Assessed group of 95 institutionalised Romanian children using the Strange Situation.

Findings:
- Institutionalised group 19% securely attached, 44% disinhibited.
- Control had 74% and 20% respectively.

27
Q

What are the effects of institutionalisation?

A

1) Disinhibited attachment:
- Equally friendly and affectionless to strangers and well known people.

2) Intellectual disability disorder:
- IDD is extreme for those adopted after 6 months.

28
Q

In terms of influence of early attachment on later relationships, describe the IWM.

A

First attachment is template for later relationships.
- Good early attachment = expected good later attachment and vice versa.

Kerns
- Securely attached infants more likely form better friendships in childhood.
Myren-Wilson and Smith
- Insecure-avoidant children more likely to be victims of bullying; insecure-resistant more likely to be bullies.

IWM affects parenting - base their style on IWM, so attachments are passed on.
- Hazan and Shaver also found a link between early attachment types and quality of adult romantic relationships.

29
Q

Describe Hazan and Shaver’s procedure and findings.

A

Procedure:
Analysed 620 replies from a love quiz.

Questioned on:
- Current and most important relationships
- Love experiences
- Attachment type

Findings:
- Securely attached adults had long-lasting relationships.
- Insecure-avoidant types tended to be jealous and feared intimacy.