Memory Accuracy (Memory) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What happens when we retrive memories?

A

We reconstruct them which may result in things being forgotten or modified = not always accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are false memories?

A

Memories that didn’t actually happen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the factors that affect eyewitness testimony?

A
  • Leading questions
  • Post-event discussion
  • Anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is eyewitness testimony?

A

The ability to remember details of events which they may have observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are leading questions?

A

Questions which are phrased to suggest a certain answer.
- Influences memory recall + lead to false memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is post-event discussion?

A

Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with other people.
- May influence the accuracy of each witnesses recall of event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is anxiety?

A

Strong emotional/physical effects which may make eyewitness recall better or worse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the effect on accuracy is somone is only a little bit anxious?

A

Accuracy is better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the effect on accuracy is somone is very anxious?

A

Accuracy is worse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What scale is anxiety measure on?

A

‘The inverted U’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who conducted a study on leading questions?

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s leading question study?

A
  • Lab study
  • Asked them leading questions about the way the car had crashed.
  • Used an intense verb ‘smashed’ = ppts judged the car as driving fast.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s leading question study?

A

How accuratly could ppts recall a video of a car crash.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the findings of Loftus and Palmer’s leading question study?

A

Leading questions biased the eyewitness recall of event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the ways leading questions affect the EWT?

A
  • Response-bias
  • Subsitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the response-bias explanation?

A

The wording of the question has no real effect on ppts memories, just influences how they decide to answer.

17
Q

What is the subsitution explanation?

A

Wording of leading questions changes the ppts memory.

18
Q

What was the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s second study?

A
  • Asked questions about broken glass.
  • Ppts had a false memory that there had been broken glass in the video.
  • The intense verb ‘smashed’ was used.
19
Q

What were the findings of Loftus and Palmer’s second study?

A
  • The intense verb altered the memory.
  • Supports the subsitution explanation.
20
Q

What are the limitations of Loftus and Palmer’s studies?

A
  • Demand characteristics: ppts may have only given those answers because they thought it was what they were expected to say.
  • Lack ecological validity: if it was a real life situation ppts may have paid more attention/tried harder to give accurate answers.
21
Q

Who conducted a study into post-event discussion?

A

Gabbert.

22
Q

What was the procedure of Gabbert’s post-event discussion study?

A
  • Studied ppts in pairs.
  • Each watched a video of the same crime but saw from different points of view.
  • Both discussed what they had seen before individually completing a test of recall.
23
Q

What were the findings of Gabbert’s post-event discussion study?

A
  • 71% = mistakenly recalled aspects they didn’t see but picked up in discussion.
  • 0% = mistakes recalled in control group (no discussion).
  • They go along with eachother to either win social approval/believe others are right (memory conformity).
24
Q

Who studied the negative effects on recall?

A

Johnson and Scott

25
Q

What was the procedure of Johnson and Scott’s negative effect study?

A
  • Led ppts to think they were involved in a lab study.
  • While in waiting room heard an arguement in next room.
  • Low anxiety condition: man walked through carrying a pen and grease on hands
  • High anxiety condition: argument followed by sound of breaking glass + man walked through holding knife covered in blood.
26
Q

What were the findings of Johnson and Scott’s negative effect study?

A
  • Ppts later picked out the man from photos.
  • 49% = identified man carrying pen.
  • 33% = identified man holding knife.
  • Tunnel theory: witnesses attention narrows to focus on a weapon (source of anxiety).
27
Q

Who conductde a study on the postive effects of anxiety on recall?

A

Yuille and Cutshall

28
Q

What was Yuille and Cutshall’s study?

A

A real life study of people witnessing a shooting.

29
Q

What were Yuille and Cutshall’s findings?

A

Witnesses had cleat memory of the event.

30
Q

Who produced the cognitive interview?

A

Fisher and Geiselman

31
Q

What was the aim of the cognitive interview?

A

To improve accuracy of memory recall.

32
Q

What are the techniuques used within cogntive interview?

A

1) Report everything
2) Reinstate the context
3) Reverse order
4) Change perspective

33
Q

What does report everything mean within cogntive interview?

A

Include lots of detail of the event which may trigger important memories.

34
Q

What does reinstate the context mean within cogntive interview?

A

Returing to the original crime scene in their minds.

  • Thinking about: weather, what they could see, emotions etc.
  • Links to context-dependent forgetting.
35
Q

What does reverse order mean within cogntive interview?

A

Recalling in a different order.

  • Prevents reporting own expectations and dishonesty.
36
Q

What does change perspective mean within cogntive interview?

A

Recalling from another perspective disrupts the effects of expectations + schema on recall.

37
Q

What is a limitation of cognitive interview?

A

It’s less effective when interviewing children.

38
Q

What is the enchanced cognitive interview? (Fisher)

A

Focuses on building a trusting relationship between individuals + witnesses.

39
Q

How do you gain a trusting relationship with the enchanced cognitive interview?

A
  • Eye contact
  • Reduce anxiety
  • Minimising distractions
  • Speaking slowly
  • Open ended questions