Luyten et al. (2020). The Mentalizing Approach to Psychopathology: State of the Art and Future Directions Flashcards

1
Q

a parentified child

A

someone who is given to much responsibility, in the absence of parental support. they are often overregulating their emotions, need to stay in control,staying away from everything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

some observations about manon and julia

A

➢ The outcomes for each child are markedly different even though they are twins(monozygotic or dizygotic?).
➢ In the absence of parental support children find ways to take care of themselves and each other. And of their parents (parentification).
➢ This is certainly not simply a story of an individual with a disorder – it is a system.
➢ Neither is it simply a story of ‘blame the parent’. It is also a story of very young parents who have not been cared for themselves. And of a society that did not sufficiently care.
➢ In terms of emotion regulation an absence of well-regulated, reflected, ‘mentalized’ emotions seems to occur in both twins.
➢ In one of them underregulated, overwhelming emotions dominate. In the other overregulation and staying away from
emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the interpersonal field

A

both self & other have an self system and affect system. they are connected through perception & behaviour

kijken in schrift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

early maladaptive schema: defectiveness/shame

A

the belief that one is defective, bad, unwanted, inferior, or unworthy. this includes the fear of insecurities being exposed to significant others, accompanied by hypersensitivity to criticism, rejection and blame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the self as agent

A

to make choices and move forward in life in a self-determined and goal-directed manner. human agency suggests intention, volition, will, purpose, and some modicum of personal control in life.

in other words, even though infants can be seen to express agency, human beings do not consciously and reflexively understand themselves as agents, in a full sense until much later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mentalization=

A

the assumption that others and oneself have a mental live with intentions that give reasons for actions.
- understandings that self and others are agents
- need to first learn about ourselves and world
- allows to navigate social world
- it’s species-specific -> only in humans and primates

the possibility for mentalization is genetically coded, but the full skill is not present at birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cause-effect

A

acts are not just behaviours. intentionality is involved within our actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

waar is mentalizing in disturbed

A

BDP en autism en soms trauma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

parental mentalizing:

A

attribute attention and meaning to what the child is doing. then the child learns that it has a mind and others have that too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

four assumptions of mentalization

A
  1. neuroscience -> mentalization is evolutionary prewired capacity
  2. developmental -> needs environmental inputs to develop
  3. transdiagnostic/transtheoretical -> common in many psychological problems/disorders
  4. recovery -> mentalization = associated with successful therapy for many disorders (but not specifically targeted)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

safe attachment is needed for good mentalization:

A

because making sense of the world and others is very difficult if you have been in unsafe/traumatic environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

neurobiology of mentalizing

A
  1. mentalizing has specific neural circuits/is evolutionary prewired
  2. is a multidimensional capacity
  3. its an umbrella concept
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

mentalizing has specific neural circuits/is evolutionary prewired=

A
  • the first signs are already visible as an infant -> they have joint attention and intentionality.
  • at 3 years -> collective intentionality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

collective intentionality=

A

ability to function in a group based on shared principles, norms + conventions
- capacity underlined by capacity to mentalize
- allows vision of others’ goals + collaboration to get to shared ones
- both mitigates and enhances competition (allows to manipulate/deceive ppl)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 dimensions of mentalizing

A
  1. automatic vs controlled
  2. self vs others
  3. internal vs external focus
  4. cognitive vs affective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

automatic mentalization

A
  • fast, reflexive, little effort needed
  • older neural circuits
  • role in stress + emotional regulation -> switch to automatic mentalization
  • usually adaptive, but overrelying on it -> biased assumptions of self or others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

controlled mentalization

A
  • conscious, verbal, reflective
  • newer brain circuits
  • involves symbols and abstractions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

external focused mentalization

A
  • inter emotional states of others based on face, posture
  • lateral frontotemporal circuits (less reflective)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

internally-focused mentalization

A
  • inferring mental states by taking perspective of the others
  • based on the context
  • medial frontoparietal networks (active and controlled)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

circuits to know the self and other

A

1.shared representation system (SR) -> empathy based on shared representations of the others mental states. implicit/visceral/body-based mirror neurons. understand others by mechanically repeating the movements (no high level of cognition needed)
2. mental state attribution system (MSA) -> more abstract, shaped by interpersonal relationships. fully develops in adolescence. vmPFC, dmPFC, TPJ, medial temporal lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

wat is er met die 2 systemen

A

the systems are mutually inhibitory: SMA down-regulates SR if it’s conflating our mental states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

mentalizing involves 2 features

A
  1. cognitive features: perspective-taking, belief-desire reasoning… -> controlled mentalizing
  2. affective features: automatic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

umbrella concept of mentalizing

A

involves theory of mind, mindfulness, perspective taking, empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

hoe definieer je attachment in mentalization

A

attachment is the context in which we start to acquire mentalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

parental reflective functionin

A

caregiver’s ability to reflect on own experiences + those of the child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

kijken naar model parental reflective functioning

A

oke

27
Q

high levels of PRF=

A

more affection to the child

  • socializing context that focuses on mental states: secure attachment + reflective functioning -> virtuous cycle of emo regulation and socioemotional development
  • parent’s mentalizing capacities fluctuate tho: but no disruption of secure attachment if already created
28
Q

mentalizing is interactive: develops by interacting with others + continually influenced by others’ capacity to
mentalize

A

oke

29
Q

modes of ineffective mentalizing=

A
  1. psychic equivalence (own thoughts or feelings become too real, no others perspectives are considered)
  2. teleological (person only recognizes real or observable goals and actions. extreme focus on exterior. no controlled mentalizing)
  3. pretend (thoughts and feelings are detached from reality (hyper-mentalizing) and narratives become overwhelming. kan leiden tot depersonalization/derealisation. internal focus, poor belief-desire reason, risk of fusing with others, vaak bij BPD)
30
Q

common factor between the 3 ways of ineffective mentalization

A

tendency to externalize aspects of self that are not mentalized yet. these are alien-self parts (expressed in attempts to dominate others minds, self injury etc.)

31
Q

dus conclusie attachment en mentalizing

A

early adversities and complex trauma have a negative effect on the ability to mentalize. high levels of parental reflective functioning is a buffer.

32
Q

strategies to hyperactivate and deactivate attachment influence:

A
  1. threshold to switch from controlled to automatic mentalizing
  2. strength of relationship severity of stress/arousal + activation of neural circuits underlying controlled/
    vs automatic mentalizing
  3. time to recover controlled mentalizing
33
Q

research supports these main points about mentalization

A
  1. mentalizing = stable, only fluctuates in contexts of stress/arousal
  2. there is a relationship between parental mentalizing + child’s attachment (more mentalizing = secure)
  3. parental mentalizing is related to child’s mentalizing -> stronger association that association with attachment.
    - early adversities + complex trauma = negative impact on mentalizing
    - high levels of PRF = buffer
  4. child’s attachment style is associated to mentalizing (secure = high)
  5. there is relationship between child’s mentalizing and cognitive + socioemotional development
  6. there is association attachment, mentalizing and stress/arousal regulation
    - secure attachment = synchronicity in behavioral systems that coordinate stress response
    - high functional connectivity attachment + mentalizing systems
    - insecure attachment = dysregulation of HPA axis -> vulnerability to stress
  7. re-emergence of pre-mentalizing modes + externalization of alien-self
    - impairments in mentalizing -> regress to teleological mode
    - BPD = pretend mode
34
Q

limitations of mentalizing approach

A
  1. relationships childhood attachment + developmental outcomes is weaker than thought
  2. attachment is moderately stable in development BUT risk status (conflict, separation…) lowers it
    - attachment = interpersonal strategy to optimize adaptation to particular environment
  3. historical, sociocultural + environmental factors determine function of attachment-behavioral system (not innate/universal as posited by Bowlby)
  4. parental sensitivity only explains small % of variance in association parent + infant attachment
  5. genetic factors determine course of attachment -> role in resetting developmental trajectories
35
Q

what do we need for the transmission of cultural knowledge

A

epistemic trust

36
Q

epistemic trust=

A

the capacity to identify knowledge conveyed by others as personally relevant and generalizable to other contexts

37
Q

children left alone in room may show random preference for a toy BUT when trusting other show clear preference for another (with facial expression) -> child’s preference is switched

A

mentalization needs trust

38
Q

ostensive cues

A

prime the recipient that whats about to be communicated is personally relevant (gazing, pointing). both verbal and nonverbal

39
Q

2 sources for whats good and bad

A
  1. own experience
  2. feelings or knowledge transmitted by trusted others
40
Q

what is a consequence of epistemic trust

A

salutogenesis

41
Q

salutogenesis=

A

ability to benefit from positive influences of the environment

42
Q

BUT epistemic trust is not the default mode of functioning. what is?

A

epistemic vigilance.

capacity to identify + filter info conveyed by others when perceived to be misleading/deceitful

43
Q

wat gebeurt er als iemand te vaak teleurgesteld wordt

A

we develop a mode where we don’t learn much from others, but base only on rudimentary experiences (feeling of alientation also from culture)

44
Q

importance of epistemic trust

A
  1. need to learn about self and others in development
    - epistemic trust allows us to do it quickly
  2. when epistemic trust = disrupted -> hard to learn to understand oneself + others
    - self, other and world become misunderstood and scary
45
Q

when does epistemic trust develop

A

before language develops (symbols and language are introduced in the stage of epistemic trust)

46
Q

new conception of attachment styles:

A

contexts for social communication that family is promoting about most effective way to function in one’s environment

in this view: insecure attachment + PDs + other psychopathologies are communicative strategies that underlie social learning to ensure adequate adaptation to changing social situations

47
Q

social learning is promoted by 3 communication channels:

A
  • channel 1: lowering epistemic vigilance
  • channel 2: enabling mechanisms of social learning
  • channel 3: re-engaging with social world
48
Q

channel 1: lowering epistemic vigilance

A

treatments provide patients with a model of mind that seems personally relevant to them. patients should recognize good intentions. key is mutual mentalizing: therapist should tailor the intervention to the client

49
Q

channel 2: enabling mechanisms of social learning

A

activated by epistemic trust. mentalizing capacity of the patient is re-activated through trust and modelling of the therapists mentalizing. this facilitates further increase in epistemic trust

50
Q

channel 3: re-engaging with social world

A

being mentalized by another person -> patient freed from isolation + re-activation of capacities to learn and grow outside therapy. seeking new experiences, reconstructing relationships, improve adaptation

51
Q

therefore aim of therapy (in context of mentalization)

A

increasing mentalization to open patient’s potential for social learning -> patient gains salutogenesis

52
Q

welke attachment styles hebben mensen met BPD

A
  • anxious/preoccupiedp
  • disorganized
53
Q

prevalence complex trauma in BPD

A

90%

54
Q

hoe zie je deficiencies in mentalizing in BPD patients

A

These impairments are typically expressed in terms of patients’ overly simplistic or overanalytic/hyperactive accounts of their own mental states and those of others

55
Q

empathy paradox in BPD

A

The characteristic pattern of mentalizing in BPD is a rapid loss of controlled mentalizing and overreliance on fast, automatic mentalizing, followed by problems with cognitive mentalizing, particularly in complex interpersonal situations; there is also an overreliance on affectively dominated and highly externally based mentalizing at the expense of mentalizing that is directly focused on mental interiors, and a tendency to conflate mental states of the self and others (so-called identity diffusion), leading to increased susceptibility to emotional contagion.Hence, the presumed superiority of mentalizing of BPD patients in some circumstances appears to be largely based on a tendency toward hypermentalizing—an attempt to make sense of others’ external cues (such as their facial expressions or posture) based on fast, automatic processing of such information. As a result, BPD patients often might “get it right,” but the flip side is that they often jump to conclusions about others’ internal mental states. This is also shown by findings concerning a negativity bias in BPD patients, which has been observed, for instance, in their interpretation of neutral faces (Herpertz & Bertsch 2015) or when they are presented with short silent video clips (Barnow et al. 2009). When presented with such material, BPD patients typically see characters as more negative and more aggressive

56
Q

role of epistemic trust in BPD

A

people with BPD have a bias in their perception of others as being hostile and untrustworthy; they tend to expect that others will reject, hurt, abandon, criticize, or neglect them or treat them dishonestly (for a recent review, see Fertuck et al. 2018). From a neurobiological perspective, the lack of trust in others typical of BPD patients appears to be mediated by the reward system, which is also centrally implicated in attachment

57
Q

in welke andere PDs ook deficiencies in mentalizing

A
  • narcissism
  • antisocial
  • avoidant
58
Q

antisocial and mentalizing: 2 routes of development

A
  1. high anxiety cluster: hypervigilance + aggression
    - fast switch to automatic + affect-dominated mentalizing
  2. callous-unemotional features: hyporeactivity to stress + instrumental aggression
    - difficulties in affective mentalizing
59
Q

wat voor adaptation strategies zijn ASPD en conduct disorder

A

ASPD + conduct disorder = adaptation strategies in abusive social environments

60
Q

welke andere mentale stoornissen hebben deficiencies in mentalizing

A
  • anxiety and depression
  • eating disorders
  • somatoform disorders
  • autism
61
Q

eating disorders and mentalizing

A

intrinsic association attachment disruptions + mentalizing impairments
- in dysregulated patients -> + mentalizing impairments and affective mentalizing
- higher-functioning patients -> hypomentalizing + cognitive hypermentalizing

62
Q

somatoform and mentalization

A

causal sequence attachment disruptions à mentalizing problems + stress
dysregulation à hyperreactivity to stress
- hyperreactivity à chronic dysregulation of bio stress system + pain/immune regulation system (also depressed mood, anxiety + fatigue)

63
Q

which disorders are dominated by teleological functioning

A
  • SUD, gambling, ADHD and psychotic
  • recent studies -> deficits in PTSD