L2 Observing personality Flashcards

1
Q

lexical hypothesis=

A

traits are words in natural language to describe individual characteristics.

  1. those personality traits that are important to a group of people will eventually become part of that group’s language
  2. more important personality characteristics are more likely to be encoded into language in many words
  3. principle component analysis of the covariance structure of traits can be used to extract the most important aspects of variation in a population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

methods for studying covariance patterns

A
  1. Take a large list of trait words in a language (from dictionaries)
  2. Use a method to derive Principal Components (or factors) on these traits
  3. Arrive at a factor structure of 5 to 7 factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

questions

A

➢ Why do we so often find these 5 (or 6 or 7) principal components in lexical studies across
the world?
➢ What is the reason for covariance between specific traits?
➢ Why do we find persistence – i.e. consistency across time?
➢ (Why) do we find pervasiveness – i.e. consistency over situations?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4 ways of interpreting covariance structures (not mutually exclusive options)

A
  1. Trait realism and temperament
  2. Situationism
  3. Network stability
  4. The self as an actor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

trait realism & temperament=

A

One can define a trait as an inferred organismic (psychological, psychobiological) structure underlying an extended family of behavioral dispositions. These dispositions are not meant to be viewed as generalized action tendencies, but as inclinations to behave in certain ways in a set of trait-relevant situations (Tellegen, 1991).

biopsychological system 1 -> trait 1 -> behavioural dispositions (inclinations to behave certain ways in trait-relevant situations)

extraversion -> liking parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the big 3 of the multidimensional personality questionnaire

A
  • positive emotionality
  • negative emotionality
  • constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

positive emotionality=

A
  • well-being
  • social closeness
  • achievement
  • social potency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

negative emotionality =

A
  • stress reactivity
  • alienation
  • aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

constraint=

A
  • harm avoidance
  • control
  • traditionalism
  • absorption
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

temperament big 3 of the infant behavior questionnaire

A

surgency
negative affectivity
orienting/regulation capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

surgency=

A
  • approach
  • vocal reactivity
  • high intensity pleasure
  • smile and laughter
  • activity level
  • perceptual sensitivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

negative affectivity=

A
  • sadness
  • distress to limitation
  • fear
  • falling reactivity (rate of recovery from stress)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

orienting/regulation capacity=

A
  • cuddliness
  • low intensity pleasure
  • duration of orienting
  • soothability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

situationism=

A

there are no personality traits as broad dispositions. therefore we cannot predict traits.

But: this strong position is no longer compatible with the evidence. A weaker version may be true tho -> situationism.

Situationism = the specific outcomes at any particular moment vary a great deal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the solution for moving personality beyond the person-situation debate

A

Step 1: Evidence for situations -> People act very differenty on different occasions
Step 2: Evidence for persons -> People act very similar from one week to the next
Step 3: Both are correct.

o Traits are best regarded as person-specific distributions of certain states-of-mind and behaviors. Thus they indicate the likelihood of such states over a certain time-period.
o These person-specific distributions are quite stable (personality)
o The specific outcomes at any particular moment vary a great deal (situationism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

network stability

A
  1. interactions of particular acts, feelings and thoughts
  2. give rise to covariance between them
  3. resulting in generalized patterns
  4. and broad traits

Persistent and pervasive personality patterns emerge from network-interactions between a large number of small personality-related components.

transient factors -> i like this party & i start conversations -> general tendency & energy -> extraversion

16
Q

stability in the performance of the actor

A

McAdams (2013): “… the self as social actor,
encompassing semantic representations of traits, social roles, and other features of self that result in and from repeated performances on the social stage of life.”

  • Persona: mask, character.
  • Appearance, i.e. the way one appears to others

(dus mensen hebben niet perse stabiele traits, maar wel stabiele patronen van hoe zij met anderen omgaan. dit komt door de interacties met anderen die shapen hoe jij je gedraagt).

17
Q

stability in the performance of the actor cirkel

A

actions -> perception and judgement by others -> reactions by others -> perceived reactions and self judgement -> actions…

dit leidt tot emergence of stable character of an actor

18
Q

doelen van verhalenbank psychiatrie

A

➢ Creating a scientific database of interviews on experiences of mental health and mental health care
➢ Developing new methods for analyzing these narratives
➢ Initiate possibilities for improving mental health care
➢ Creating educational material for students in mental health care
➢ Working against taboo and stigma
➢ Offering comfort, strength and inspiration to fellow patients (lotgenoten)

19
Q

communion=

A

sharing, feeling connected with others

“communion manifests itself in the sense of being at one with other organisms. […] communion manifests in noncontractual cooperation”

Specific: love/friendship, dialogue, unity/togetherness, caring/help.

20
Q

wat vond de studie “variation in narrative identity is associated with trajectories of mental health”

A

agency & redemption & contamination -> wellbeing and psychological problems

21
Q

personality functioning model

A

personality functioning:
- self: identity & self-direction
- interpersonal: empathy & intimacy

22
Q

Big 3=

A

Model of continuity from temperamental traits to personality, including: Positive Emotionality (PEM), Negative Emotionality (NEM) and Constraint (CON).

23
Q

Person-specific distributions

A

Fleeson: Traits are best regarded as person-specific distributions of certain behaviors states-of-mind. Thus they indicate the likelihood of such states and behaviors over a certain time-period.

24
Q

agency=

A

Bakan “Agency manifests itself in selfprotection, self-assertion, and self-expansion; Agency manifests itself in the formation of separations; Agency manifests itself in the urge to master”.

Specific: self-mastery, status/victory, empowerment, achievement/responsibility,