L2 Observing personality Flashcards
lexical hypothesis=
traits are words in natural language to describe individual characteristics.
- those personality traits that are important to a group of people will eventually become part of that group’s language
- more important personality characteristics are more likely to be encoded into language in many words
- principle component analysis of the covariance structure of traits can be used to extract the most important aspects of variation in a population
methods for studying covariance patterns
- Take a large list of trait words in a language (from dictionaries)
- Use a method to derive Principal Components (or factors) on these traits
- Arrive at a factor structure of 5 to 7 factor
questions
➢ Why do we so often find these 5 (or 6 or 7) principal components in lexical studies across
the world?
➢ What is the reason for covariance between specific traits?
➢ Why do we find persistence – i.e. consistency across time?
➢ (Why) do we find pervasiveness – i.e. consistency over situations?
4 ways of interpreting covariance structures (not mutually exclusive options)
- Trait realism and temperament
- Situationism
- Network stability
- The self as an actor
trait realism & temperament=
One can define a trait as an inferred organismic (psychological, psychobiological) structure underlying an extended family of behavioral dispositions. These dispositions are not meant to be viewed as generalized action tendencies, but as inclinations to behave in certain ways in a set of trait-relevant situations (Tellegen, 1991).
biopsychological system 1 -> trait 1 -> behavioural dispositions (inclinations to behave certain ways in trait-relevant situations)
extraversion -> liking parties
the big 3 of the multidimensional personality questionnaire
- positive emotionality
- negative emotionality
- constraint
positive emotionality=
- well-being
- social closeness
- achievement
- social potency
negative emotionality =
- stress reactivity
- alienation
- aggression
constraint=
- harm avoidance
- control
- traditionalism
- absorption
temperament big 3 of the infant behavior questionnaire
surgency
negative affectivity
orienting/regulation capacity
surgency=
- approach
- vocal reactivity
- high intensity pleasure
- smile and laughter
- activity level
- perceptual sensitivity
negative affectivity=
- sadness
- distress to limitation
- fear
- falling reactivity (rate of recovery from stress)
orienting/regulation capacity=
- cuddliness
- low intensity pleasure
- duration of orienting
- soothability
situationism=
there are no personality traits as broad dispositions. therefore we cannot predict traits.
But: this strong position is no longer compatible with the evidence. A weaker version may be true tho -> situationism.
Situationism = the specific outcomes at any particular moment vary a great deal
the solution for moving personality beyond the person-situation debate
Step 1: Evidence for situations -> People act very differenty on different occasions
Step 2: Evidence for persons -> People act very similar from one week to the next
Step 3: Both are correct.
o Traits are best regarded as person-specific distributions of certain states-of-mind and behaviors. Thus they indicate the likelihood of such states over a certain time-period.
o These person-specific distributions are quite stable (personality)
o The specific outcomes at any particular moment vary a great deal (situationism)