Limits of Knowlege(epistemology) Flashcards
philosophical scepticism vs normal doubts
Philosophical scepticism = Once in a lifetime occurrence, that is difficult to solve.
(eg whether god exists)
Normal doubt = everyday doubts that are easy to solve
(eg may be no parking spaces due to being half an hour later)
Role of scepticism
1) To doubt everything (thus establishing nothing can be known -global scepticism)
2) used as a tool for establishing the opposite (certainty) - ie that which cannot be doubted
Descartes 3waves of doubt
1) Illusion-> can doubt reliability of senses (ie straw in water)
2) Dreaming -> life is a dream (ie experience machine)
3) Deception -> Evil demon deceiving always
response to scepticism
Descartes own response to Demon Deceiver :
- in order to be deceived i must exist (i think therefore i am)
Empiricist responses:
- Russell-> cat (other creatures exist)
- Locke -> Coherence of senses
- Berkeley -> can doubt reality, not the image in our brain of reality. Therefore. cannot doubt we are doubting
philosophical vs normal scepticism eval
Normal:
- occurs frequently
- trivial/unimportant
- easily resolved
Philosophical:
- infrequent (Descartes argues once in a lifetime)
- important
- very difficult for resolve (if at all)
incredulity meaning
doubt
local scepticism + examples
= Where we may doubt some particular domain of knowledge
EG
- whether moral propositions express truths
- whether god exists
- whether i am currently having a veridical experience
Global scepticism + examples
Where we doubt all knowledge, not just a particular domain.
The inherent contradiction of global scepticism
- The claim “scepticism is true” is self-defeating; someone who is committed to global scepticism is committed to doubting everything, so they must also doubt that scepticism is true.
Why is Descartes first and second waves of doubt not examples of global scepticism?
+
Why is the third wave of doubt an example of GS
Illusion + Dreaming = Not enough to doubt everything (in particular a priori knowledge).
Evil demon = Deceiving us about all things all the time, hence a prior and a posterior knowledge can be doubted).