Lecture 6 part 2 Flashcards
Mathemical models of jury decision making
Jurors make mental calculations regarding importance of evidence to reach verdict
Explanation model of jury decision making
- The story model
- Jurors make connections between peices of evidence
- Personal differences may influence story construction
Final verdict
- Unanimous decision
- Hung jury
- US allows majority votes if deliboration lasted more than 2 hours
Jury nullification
- When jury ignores law and evidence and makes verdict based on some other criteria
- May believe law is unfair in particular case
Chaos theory
Jurors ignore the law and decide verdict for emotional or bias reasons
Studying jury behaviour: post trial interviews
- Not allowed in Canada
- High external validity
- Cannot establish cause and effect
- Low reliability
Studying jury behaviour: archives
- High external validity
- Cannot establish cause and effect
- Low reliability
Studying jury behaviour: simulation
- High internal validity
- Low external validity
Studying jury behaviour: field studies
- High external validity
- Difficult to control/recieve approval
Predicting verdicts
- Can sometimes predict how jurors will act
- Jurors influenced by evidence and personal biases/attitudes
Factors influencing jurors’ decisions
- Juror demographics
- Juror personality traits
- Defendant characteristics
- Victim/witness characteristics
- Expert testimony
Juror demographics influence
- Gender
- Race
- Socioeconomic status
Cross-race effect
More likely to reach guilty verdict for defendants of other race
Black sheep effect
stronger evidence leads to being harsher towards in-group
Juror personality traits influence
- Authoritarianism
- Dogmatism
- High in these traits more likely to convict