lecture 4 - theorising prisons, understanding the hidden functions of prisons Flashcards
what does mathiesen 1990 prisons on trial questions the effectivness of imprisonment in meeting its stated aims, its ability to prevent future crime through:
- deterring
-incapacitating - rehabilitating individuals
- or on basis that it is simply deserved
what countries does mathiesen 1990 prisons on trial collate evidence from regarding the defensibility of prison?
-scandinavia
-britain
- united states
what does utilitarian theory argue about punishment
argue that punishment is JUSTIFIED on basis of
PREVENTING future offending via
- deterrence,
- incapacitation and
- rehabilitation
what does retributive theory argue about punishment?
punishment is DESERVED by the offender
what does mathiesen 1990 conclude about prisons on trial
prison is a FIASCO and does not find a defence in the celebrated purposes espoused in penal theory
what does mathiesen 1990 argue we are in need of when assessing prisons on trial? to contribute to the shrinking what prison solution is needed?
need for a COMPLETE REASSESSMENT of the prison institution
- to contribute to the shrinking - perhaps abolition of the prison solution
what is a sociological explanation of why we use prisons?
punishment plays a wider role and function in our society
for durkheim, what provides a function to society
punishment
for durkheim, what key term means = based on a shared belief in core or fundamental values
the collective conscience
for durkheim, what does crime do to these fundamental values
breaches
for durkheim, what unites society and how does it do it? what desire does that feeling create by pulling on what?
crime can unite society in their DISGUST towards certain behaviour
this disgust then creates a DESIRE for punishment - pulling on collective sentiments
for durkheim what view does punishment reinforce and what does it repair?
reinforces peoples views that the behaviour is wrong and repairs social harms caused
for durkheim certain types of crime produce what outrage?
- produces universal and instant reaction of outrage
for durkheim, people are motivated to see that offenders get their….
just deserts
for durkheim the function of punishment is restoring and maintaining the…
social and collective conscience
for durkheim , the primary focus of punishment is the ritualised refffirmation of….. and reifnorcement of… (quotation found in garland)
….ritualised reaffirmation of COLLECTIVE VALUES and the reinforcement of GROUP SOLIDARITY
for durkheim, the prison as symbolism of modern punishment represents an example of our most severe..and therefore represents the greatest?
most severe punishment and therefore represents the greatest condemnation
for durkheim what does prison as a symbolism of modern punishment make those of us not in prison feel?
- feel we are morally superior kept apart from those who pose a danger to our way of life
problems are there with selectivity? how useful is durkheim’s argument when we look at what crimes?
mundane crimes and other forms of punishment
- community sentences
- fines etc
durkheim’s version of the collective conscience is rooted in what?
rooted in the idea of common values
criticisms of durkheim’s theory on punishment
- punishment can evoke social divisions instead of solidarities
- what is functional for one group is dysfunctional for another