Lecture 21 - randomised controlled trials Flashcards
Randomised controlled trials
Analytic study
Intervention studies
Experiment, do something observe the effect
Could the parents’ decision to vaccinate their children have influenced the findings of the study?
Yes
How do we know if randomisation worked?
- Percentages similar
- Age in both groups same
- Gender in both groups same
- Number of medications a day is same
- Balanced similar
Random selection
Randomly select people from source population to become a sample
Randomisation
Already have sample
Randomly assign treatment or control
cross over studies
Each person gets both treatments and control
confounding is effectively eliminated
only be done for long-term conditions and treatments that are not curative (the treatment effect needs to wear-off during the washout)
“per protocol” analysis: Confounding could occur
Lost benefit of randomisation
If participants (or researchers) know which treatment they are on, they may act differently
May affect outcome
Blinding an important way to avoid bias
Making treatment unknown to people
Many exposures should not be randomised:
• Known harmful toxins or procedures
Unethical to do
Baby cot death
No equipoise
Unethical’
how might this introduce bias?
In terms of study design
Find in effects vs treatments
Pharmaceuticals can make their drugs seem more appealing
But disadvantages
Time and money
It can be difficult to achieve blinding
Equipoise (enough uncertainty)
Generalisability? – does it reflect the real-world?
Hierarchy of evidence
whats at top?
RCT
intervention study
RCT
non RCT
analytic study
Essential elements of an RCT
Participants randomly allocated to groups
There is a comparison (control) group
Testing effect of treatments/interventions
What if they didn’t randomise?
Things that may have
influenced parents
cost
community outbreak
polio in family member
What if they didn’t randomise?
Things that may have altered the risk of polio
Polio was more common in wealthy
A community outbreak ? Outbreaks often missed areas
Likely to have been exposed already
in RCT What determines exposure?
confounding factors
factors that determine the exposure may also affect the outcome
In RCT Why do we randomise?
People who decide to take a treatment are often different to those who don’t: confounding
• Age and sex
• Health risks
• Views of the health professionals treating them
• Health beliefs and habits
How do RCTs avoid confounding?
Participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control groups
Randomisation will not affect the outcome
If enough people are randomised,
should there be the same proportion of confounders in each group?
yes
Randomisation / Random Allocation
Both known and unknown
confounders should be balanced
Equal chance for each participant to be in either group (intervention / control)
Randomisation means
confounding is an unlikely reason for differences in outcomes between groups
Randomisation is not
Random Selection
Variants of randomisation
Cluster
Stratified or Block randomisation
may be difficult to randomise individuals so what do you do instead
randomise groups (clusters) of participants
Examples: GP practices, hospital wards, schools
If you want to be certain that important confounders are eliminated. what do you do instead?
Stratified or Block randomisation
Examples: randomise individuals within each age group, sex, or hospital
what is Cluster Randomisation?
Entire practices are randomised to treatment or control
All participants in each practice get the same intervention
GPs don’t have to do different things for different patients.
what is Stratified or Block Randomisation?
Participants are randomised to treatment or placebo in blocks (or strata) at each hospital.
Differences between hospitals will be balanced between treatment and control groups