Lecture 14c, Conditions of Practice I (2) Flashcards
Variability of Practice
questions to consider:
- how variable should a practice session be?
- what type of variability best promotes learning
- how does variability in practice affect transfer?
the goal is to determine what practice methods will optimize learning
If you want to be good at throwing accurately does it help to practice distance variations?
- yes, in terms of schema we are trying to build up relationships between our outcomes and parameters in case we encounter a new transfer task we have good representation of what the parameter and force will be for this new distance
- the more variation or relations you have between forces and distances the better able you are to parameterize new movements
- variability of practice is based on schema theory
transfer/generalization question (going to be useful for this) - if you have variations in your experiences you can better achieve new goals
If you want to be good at throwing free-throws, does it help to practice distance variations?
- there is not a big deal of variation but does it help to practice with variation when it is not needed (there is more ambiguity in this case of whether it is good or not to have variation)
retention/specificity question
Whether to practice one skill or multiple variations of that same skill? (constant vs. variable practice)
constant practice
- only one variation of the criterion task is practiced
- criterion task is practiced under identical environmental conditions
variable practice
- multiple variations of the criterion task are practiced
- variability achieved by practicing criterion task:
◦ under different environmental
conditions (wind speed, size of
ball etc.)
◦ at different speeds, distances,
etc
What practice leads to better transfer of unpracticed tasks/skills
variability of practice leads to better transfer to unpractised tasks/skills
benefits in transfer for variable practice conditions
variability of practice can strengthen learning for a criterion task/skill
Variable practice, worst in acquisition, yet best in retention on criterion task
- higher score, worse performance in this case
- variable practice group they have highest error in acquisition, but by the end they are all doing the same at the criterion task
- what we see with delayed retention is the variable group does best in delayed retention task
Summary of Practice Variability Effects
- adding variability of practice increases transfer to novel task/skill variations
- adding variability of practice has been shown to increase retention (but some exceptions)
- however, increased variability of practice usually decreases acquisition due to more variations of skill being practiced (more challenging)
- we need to assess how well they are doing in learning which is retention test after a while and not just how well they are doing in performance which shows problematic data in terms of variability
After GMP is selected and movement is completed
Four types of information stored in STM
A. initial conditions of the movement (how heavy the ball was. what the surface was like, windy)
B. parameters that were assigned to the movement (*e.g., amplitude/ absolute force or movement time)
C. outcome feedback about the movement (did the required outcome get met?)
D. sensory consequences of the movement (when we perform a movement we are storing information about how it felt, and visual - so we can use it with the comparator in future - closed-loop feedback)
these enable two schemas (rules) to be formed - recall & recognition schemas
RECALL SCHEMA
relation between parameters & movement outcome
after each movement, information discarded from STM leaving only a rule
rule is strengthened with more (varied) data (parameters, outcomes & initial conditions) - the more variety we have in initial, outcome and parameter the stronger the rule becomes
- you can have a number of individual movements but we store the relation between parameters and movement
note: outcome could be on y axis (interchangeable)
PLAYS IMPORTANT ROLE IN MOVEMENT PRODUCTION
in fast movements, mostly the recall schema controlling movement (there is no time for feedback, the programming of the parameter is controlling the movement)
RECOGNITION SCHEMA
slower movements, where we have time to compare feedback to our expected movement
relation between sensory consequences & movement outcomes
- again, after each movement, information discarded from STM leaving only a rule
PLAYS IMPORTANT ROLE IN MOVEMENT EVALUATION
more important for control of slower movements or it is important for programing newer movements next time (we have time for feedback so it is online)
- have you seen or felt this before with recognition / recall is to enact or initiate movement
Variability of practice will enhance schemas & estimation of (new) parameters & sensory
consequences
- practicing a variety of movements with same GMP (different parameters, initial conditions) will form strong schemas
- production of new movement, requires application of schema(s)
- extensive parameter exploration»_space; less uncertainty and error, due to more accurate estimations of parameters & sensory consequences
If you want to be good at throwing free-throws, does it help to practice at nearer/farther distances?
- even if you are only tested at one distance, there are advantages to practicing at different variations
- free throw shot - show some exceptions to schema theory
There is evidence that success at shooting free-throw type shots scales with distance
- the closer you are to the basket, success to making basket should be higher and as you get farther it decreases
At the free-throw line, appears to show an exception “especial skill”
- the actual performance at special distance is closer to 85% - violation of schema theory
- there is bad transfer at nearby distance because you are so used to other distance
- doing only one skills becomes unique which may not generalize
- there can be benefits from practicing at only one distance if there are only going to ever shot from there but in basketball they shot from different positions so variation may be good
Variability of Practice: Summary
- variability in practice of one skill (e.g., throwing) is good for transfer (aid parameter generalization).
- constant practice of one parameter variation can lead to an “especial skill” / good for that skill, but doesn’t generalize well to different outcomes (may show poorer than expected generalizations)
- variability of practice seems to be best after some initial constant practice (promote stability and acquisition of invariant/ relative features