L31-L33 Flashcards
What predicts lower suicide rates among Indigenous youth?
- cultural continuity: the opportunity to connect with their cultural heritage
- e.g. self-government, land claims, education, health services, cultural facilities, police/firemen
cultural factors have an additive effect on improving mental health
Arends-Tóth & Van de Vijver’s model of acculturation
- cultural continuity > heritage identification > psychlogical outcomes
- mainstream discrimination > mainstream identification > psychological outcomes and cultural competence
Acculturation
people from different cultural groups being in continuous first-hand contact creates change in one or both groups
regardless of which group is dominant vs. non-dominant
3 possible outcomes of group-level acculturation
- destructive
- reactive
- creative
none are inherently positive or negative
Destructive
outcome of group-level acculturation
loss of culture through absorption or elimination due to continuous contact with another cultural group
e.g. Indigenous languages (lost due to residential schools), Chinese foot binding (lost due to intervention of Western missionaries)
Reactive
outcome of group-level acculturation
groups re-establish their original cultures by revitalizing or reaffirming them
e.g. language schools, Squamish houses
Creative
outcome of group-level acculturation
new cultures or cultural information emerge through interactions between the original cultures
e.g. spam musubi combines Samoan, Japanese, and American cultures
Goal of 4 strategies for individual-level acculturation
strategies reflect how people reconcile norms and values of their culture of origin and the culture of the dominant society
integration, assimilation, separation, marginalization
Mutual exclusion model
unidimensional model of individual-level acculturation
the adoption of dominant norms and values is inversely related to the retention of original norms and values
- Assimilation: adopting mainstream culture and rejecting heritage culture
- Separation: rejecting mainstream culture and retaining heritage culture
Integration
bidimensional model of acculturation
- strongly identifies with both cultures
- participates in host culture and maintains traditions of heritage culture
- most successful strategy (more social support)
Assimilation
bidimensional model of acculturation
- strongly identifies with mainstream culture but not with heritage culture
- participates in host culture and leaves behind traditions of heritage culture
Separation
bidimensional model of acculturation
- strongly identifies with heritage culture but not with mainstream culture
- ignores host culture and maintains traditions of heritage culture
Marginalization
bidimensional model of acculturation
- not identified with either culture
- least common strategy
Predictors of the 4 acculturation strategies
- increased prejudice from host = increased separation
- decrease in migrants’ socioeconomic status = increased marginalization or separation
- host values cultural diversity and multiculturalism = increased integration or assimilation
lower SES entails contempt from the mainstream society (which predicts separation) but also contempt from higher SES co-ethnics (which predicts marginalization)
What caused radicalization among Muslim Europeans?
- prejudice against Muslim migrants led them to engage in extremist radicalization
- e.g. socioeconomic marginalization, lack of education, etc.
they seek an for identity and connection elsewhere, and adopt extreme beliefs to justify violence