Investments Ch 6 Flashcards
HISTORY OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING
HISTORY OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING
- Measuring risk and assessing possible outcomes
- Cognitive errors and emotional biases
- Examples of investment bubbles:
- 1840s UK railroad industry
- Early 1980s Japanese stock market
- 1929 and 1987 U.S. stock market
- Late 1990s Dot.com stocks
- 2008 housing market
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
Modern Portfolio Theory holds that all investors are risk-averse and
rational and that they follow these rules:
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
Modern Portfolio Theory holds that all investors are risk-averse and
rational and that they follow these rules:
- Make decisions that maximize expected utility
- Forecast without biases
- Make decisions using rational expectations
- Maintain indifference curves along their efficient frontiers
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY ASSUMPTIONS
- Financial security returns are random variables and can be
fully described by their means and standard deviations. - Investors are rational and risk averse.
- Investors make decisions that maximize their expected
wealth. - There are no trading costs (taxes, fees, bid-ask spreads, etc.).
- Investors are price takers. Their trades have no impact on
prices. - Investors form homogeneous expectations about risk and
expected returns because they have identical information
sets. - Investors can borrow and lend at the risk-free rate of interest
THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS
EMH: Developed by Eugene Fama
- Relevant information is reflected in asset prices.
- Changes in relevant information will be immediately and
completely reflected in changing asset prices.
There are three levels of informational efficiency:
1. Weak form – Historical Prices and volume data
2. Semi-strong form – Publicly available information
3. Strong form – All relevant information including private
EFFICIENT MARKET ASSUMPTIONS
EFFICIENT MARKET ASSUMPTIONS
- Financial markets are informationally efficient (prices reflect relevant information).
- Investors form rational expectations regarding future price movements. * Security prices follow a random walk, suggesting that price changes are random and therefore unpredictable.
- Changes in relevant information (which are random) will instantaneously be reflected in an asset’s price.
- Price changes are unbiased and virtually impossible to predict. * There are large numbers of financial market participants who maximize profits as they process new and relevant information.
- Three levels of market efficiency are weak form, semi-strong form, and strong form.
WEAK FORM MARKET
- Asset prices reflect historical pricing and volume information.
- Investors cannot use this information set (past prices and volume) to generate a return that exceeds its risk adjusted expected value
SEMI-STRONG FORM MARKET
- Asset prices reflect all publicly available information.
- Investors cannot use publicly available information to generate an
excess return. - Examples of information reflected in asset prices:
–Firm related
–Market related
STRONG FORM MARKET
- Asset prices reflect all relevant information, including private
information. - The implication is that investors cannot use any information,
including private information, to generate an excess return.
MARKET ANOMALIES
MARKET ANOMALIES
- January Effect
- Dogs of the Dow
- Low Price to Book Value
- Neglected Firm Effect
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE (1 OF 2)
- Focuses on the decision-making process
- Offers a link to political science, sociology, and psychology
- Investors are influenced by emotions when making decisions under
uncertainty. - Investors are influenced by group dynamics.
COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE (2 OF 2)
- In a behavioral finance framework, financial decision makers are
not the perfect machines assumed in modern portfolio theory. - Much evidence suggests that investors are subject to a variety
of behavioral biases. - A behavioral market is one that is imperfect, with trading by
individuals with emotional baggage who make cognitive mistakes
during the investment process.
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE: ASSUMPTIONS
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE: ASSUMPTIONS
- Decision makers are not perfectly rational agents and they exhibit bounded rationality.
- Investors are easily influenced by their peers.
- Investors view gains and losses differently from each other and their decisions are characterized by prospect theory.
- Investors make information processing errors that result in over reaction and under reaction to information changes.
- Investors make processing errors.
- Investors are emotional.
FRAMING VS. NARROW FRAMING
FRAMING VS. NARROW FRAMING
Framing
* Investment decisions can be influenced by the manner in which the
decision is framed.
Narrow Framing
* Attaching great importance to the individual components of a portfolio rather than viewing the portfolio in its entirety
PROSPECT THEORY
PROSPECT THEORY
- Investors incorrectly estimate probabilities and the associated
outcomes - Overweight small chance outcomes just to avoid a loss
- Make decisions that minimize feeling of regret, which makes them
loss averse - Forecast in the presence of a variety of biases
- Make decisions using naïve expectations
BEHAVORIAL FINANCE AND COGNITIVE ERRORS
BEHAVORIAL FINANCE AND COGNITIVE ERRORS
Cognitive Errors
* When investors inaccurately process new information about asset
prices
* Common cognitive errors include representativeness, anchoring,
cognitive dissonance, gambler’s fallacy, and mental accounting
REPRESENTATIVENESS
REPRESENTATIVENESS
- An assessment of new information or decisions based on superficial
traits rather than fundamental analysis
ANCHORING AND COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
ANCHORING AND COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Anchoring
* The use of immaterial information in making investment decisions
Cognitive Dissonance
* Ignoring or discounting new information that is not consistent with
the investor’s fundamental view
COGNITIVE ERRORS
COGNITIVE ERRORS
Gambler’s Fallacy: The
mistaken notion that the
onset of an outcome either
increases or decreases the
probability of that outcome
occurring again
Mental Accounting:
Investors make decisions
based on individual mental
categories, which can be
unique to each investor.
ADDITIONAL COGNITIVE ERRORS
Illusion of Control:
Investors expect a different outcome
than others because they believe they can exert some form
of control over the outcome when in fact they cannot
Hindsight Bias: Investors conveniently forget bad outcomes
and remember good ones. This leads to the repeat of
historical trading errors and an inaccurate judgment on the
portfolio winners
Confirmation Bias: Investors search for information that
supports their viewpoint while avoiding disagreeing positions.
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE & EMOTIONAL BIASES
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE & EMOTIONAL BIASES
Loss Aversion
* Behavioral investors arrange their portfolios to avoid losses rather
than structuring them to generate gains because the pain of loss is
so great.
Regret Aversion
* Similar to loss aversion, regret aversion is the fear of making poor
decisions. Picking losers is a signal of bad judgment and investors
hope to avoid being labeled as such.
OTHER BIASES
* Overconfidence
* Self-control
* Clustering Illusion
* Optimism bias