investigative expertise Flashcards

1
Q

state problems with investigative decisions.

A
  • people make crucial, time-critical decisions under uncertainty
  • demands outstrip cognitive resources, sub-optimal decision-making
  • little research on SIO decision-making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

state source of problems with evidence and inference in the manning case.

A
  • no linking the men with the deposition site = failure to generate
  • particles and replacement = failure to test
  • implausible time scale = failure to simulate
  • clean his van = failure to evaluate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define the confirmation bias

A
  • tend to seek evidence to confirm rather than falsify hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

state the generation of multiple hypothesis. (Hells angels)

A
  1. non-discrimatory shooting by other bikers
  2. non-dis shooting by others not associated to biking
  3. deliberate shooting of Tobin by bikers or otherwise because of his personal lifestyle
  4. or because of his affiliation to biking group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the result of multiple hypothesis?

A

more experienced came up with more hypothesis early on which was more effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define the mental models theory.

A

individuals cannot construct models of possibilities, the ease with which they can reason is a result of the ease with which possibilities can be discovered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name biases that can block decision making.

A
  • statistical
  • knowledge
  • meta-cognitive
  • social
  • strategy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

name findings from the benefits fraud case study.

A
  • investigators show pseudo-diagnosicity with simple cases, and diagnosticity with complex cases.
  • controls show no effect.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

name the difference between simple and complex cases.

A

simple cases involve direct mapping from features to data choices, whereas complex cases requires inferences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name implications from the benefits fraud case study.

A
  • demonstrate flexibility in strategies selected for hypothesis-tesing.
  • experts may use ‘confirmatory’ strategy for information gain, and ‘diagnostic’ strategy for case comprehension.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state the nature of investigative expertise.

A
  • explanation building
  • hypotheiss testing
  • procedural decision-making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

true or false: experienced investigators delay search for additional data to keep search space as small as possible.

A

true - only expand search if given specific reason to do so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly