Introduction to SSR and elements of arguments Flashcards

1
Q

argument =

A

attempts to persuade people, to influence beliefs and actions by giving reasons to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

waar bestaat een argument uit

A
  • a set of propositions: one is a conclusion, the remainders are premises intended to support the conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

proposition =

A

factual content that is expressed by a declarative sentence on a particular occasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the same proposition can…

A

be expressed by different sentences!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

critical thinking =

A

thinking that is purposeful, reasoned and goal directed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

critical disposition=

A

the ability to think about propositions and use ones thinking skills to decide whether arguments presented are legitimate and convincing, or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

waarom waarschijnlijk weinig critical thinking

A

door de overlading aan informatie, als je over alles kritisch na moet denken kost dat veel te veel moeite (maar tegelijkertijd zijn mensen ook hoger opgeleid dan vroeger, dus meer capabel om kritisch na te denken)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

rhetoric =

A

any verbal or written attempt to persuade someone to believe, desire or do something that does not attempt to give good reasons for the belief/desire/action, but attempts to motivate that belief/desire/action through the power of words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

analysing attempts to persuade: 3 steps

A
  1. identify (is the person attempting to persuade?)
  2. reconstructing (the argument -> demonstrate the steps and form of reasoning)
  3. evaluation (what is good about the persuasion and what not)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 steps for reconstructing arguments

A
  1. identify conclusion
  2. identify the premises
  3. number the premises and write them out in order
  4. draw in the inference bar
  5. write out the conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hoe kan je conclusies herkennen

A

hence, thus etc.

maar dit is niet onderdeel van de propositions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

hoe identificeer je een premisis

A

what are the persons reasons for believing their conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

extraneous material

A

materiaal dat niet perse een rol speelt in het argument zelf: bijvoorbeeld indicator woorden (thus, daarom)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

wat is het verschil tussen een argument en een uitleg

A

explanation: the speaker assumes that their audience already accept a proposition, and the speaker has no need to persuade the audience of this fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 steps to identify conclusions

A
  1. understand what the main point of the text is
  2. rewrite premises that are unclear
  3. identify extended arguments
  4. recognise the argument (look for words such as therefore, hence, thus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

intermediate conclusions =

A

when the conclusion of an argument may itself serve as a premise for another argument etc.

17
Q

3 steps to determine whether an argument is good or not

A
  1. is an argument even presented?
  2. reconstruct: show the steps of the reasoning
  3. evaluate the argument