Gender Studies reversed Flashcards
1
Q
- That young children cannot distinguish between appearance and realty/have no conversation skills - children show these skills when they understand that superficial changes don’t affect physical characteristics of an object.
- Kohlbergs
A
Piaget
2
Q
- Interviewed 55 children aged 2-5.5 years, found the children who had reached gender constancy were more likely to pay more attention to the same sex models in the film - looking for role models - understand their gender will not change.
- Kohlbergs
A
Slaby and Frey
3
Q
- 4yo - okay for George to play with dolls, 6yo - it’s wrong, older children (9yo) - okay but unusual - still lack internal knowledge, think that toys change gender.
- Kohlbergs
A
Damon
4
Q
- Children who had reached gender constancy were sensitive to the implicit messages of the advert that certain toys were right/wrong for boys or girls.
- Kohlbergs
- Supports Damon’s study.
A
Ruble
5
Q
- 3yo couldn’t answer ‘will you be a mummy or daddy’, whereas 95% of 5yo could - think gender can change before they reach gender constancy.
- Kohlbergs
A
Rabban
6
Q
- Used visual preference techniques, 3 months (very minor preferences), 18 months (preference to boys activities - stronger in boys) - children have preferences at a younger age than Kohlberg suggested.
- Gender Schema
A
Campbell et al
7
Q
- 2 year olds who cannot correctly label their gender spent 80% of their time in same gender groups, whereas those who couldn’t, only spent 50% of their time - motivated to learn the behaviours associated with their gender.
- Gender Schema
- Supports Campbell et al’s study.
A
Fagot
8
Q
- Showed video of a male being a nurse and a female being a doctor, many children either missed the point, distorted the information (M-D, F-N), or quickly forgot - making the information fit their schema.
- Gender Schema
A
Martin and Halverson
9
Q
- Children who had not attained a gender identity still disapproved non-conforming behaviour - it’s innate, not always caused from a gender schema.
- Goes against Gender Schema
- Contradicts Martin and Halverson’s study.
A
Bussey and Bandura
10
Q
- In prenatal development, the right side develops earlier/is thicker in males and explains why males have better spatial ability - testosterone is a key influence.
- Biological
A
Geshwind and Galaburda
11
Q
- Female monkeys exposed to male hormones during pre-natal development engaged in more rough and tumble play than control group - testosterone causes aggression.
- Biological (Testosterone)
A
Young
12
Q
- Mothers who took male sex hormones to stop uterine bleeding during pregnancy had girls who behaved like tomboys - male sex hormones affect foetal development.
- Biological
A
Ehrdardt and Money
13
Q
- Had a sex change after circumsition went wrong and was brought up as a girl, was never happy until he reverted back to male at 14 - shows how genes/hormones determine gender not how they’re brought up
A
David Reimer (Ehrdardt and Money)
14
Q
- None of the women agreed to have sex with a stranger, 75% of men agreed - importance of parental investment, women = picky.
- Evolutionary
A
Clark and Hatfield
15
Q
- Men became more distressed at the image of partner being sexually unfaithful (risk of cuckoldry), women became more distressed at partner being in love with someone else.
- Evolutionary
- Supports Clarke and Hatfield’s study.
A
Buss
16
Q
- Men valued physical attractiveness more than women, also preferred a partner younger than themselves, women valued financial capacity and success - shows different genders seek different attributes.
- Evolutionary
A
Buss (2)