FA - Behavioral science - statistics Flashcards
cross-sectional study
what’s happening? (observational)
assess prevalence
case control study
what happened?
assess risk factors (prior exposures)
assess Odds Ratio
cohort study
What will happen? Does exposure increase likelihood of disease
assess Relative Risk
case series
observational - smaller # of ppl w/ disease (ø controls) to generate profile of disease (characterize a new type of disease)
sensitivity
proportion of ppl w/ disease who test (+)
specificity
proportion of ppl w/o disease who test (-)
high sensitivity =
when negative - rule out dz!
SN-N-OUT
high specificity =
when positive - rule out in!
SP-P-IN
PPV
proportion of + tests that are true +
varies with dz prevalence and pre-test probability
(PP = + +)
NPV
proportion of - tests that are true -
varies inversely with dz prevalence and pre-test probability
(NP = - +)
when is OR used?
case control studies
when is RR used?
cohort studies
RRR
relative risk reduction - proportion of risk reduction attributable to an intervention compared to a control
= 1 - (% dz w. intervention / %dz w.o intervention)
ARR
absolute risk reduction - difference in risk attributable to an intervention compared to a control
= % dz w.o intervention - %dz w. intervention)
AR
attributable risk - ∆ risk between exposed and unexposed (proportion of occurrences attributable to exposure
= % exposed w. disease - % unexposed w. disease
needed to treat for one person to benefit
= 1/ ARR
needed to harm (# of patients who need to be exposed to risk factor to be harmed)
= 1/ AR
cohort study where 3 different grps are studied over time (ie smokers vs non-smokers vs former smokers)
type of bias?
selection bias
study looking only at in patients
type of bias?
selection bias - berkson bias
study looking at a disease with an early mortality or loss to follow-up (esp of a particular type of population)
type of bias?
attrition bias (type of selection bias)
note that this type of bias does not occur when the losses happen equally and randomly between the exposed and unexposed groups.
studying populations that are generally healthier than the general population
type of bias?
selection bias - healthy workers + volunteer bias
patients w. disease remember exposure after learning of similar cases
type of bias?
recall bias
groups who know they’re being studied behave differently than they would otherwise
type of bias?
measurement bias - hawthorne effect
(think of a hawk watching a bird on a thorne - the bird is likely to act differently if it knew it was being watched by a predator)
patients in treatment group spends more time in highly specialized hospital units
type of bias?
procedure bias (subjects in different groups are not treated the same)
observer expects treatment group to show signs of recovery, and is likely to document more + outcomes
type of bias?
how to prevent?
observer-expectancy bias
prevent by performing a double blind study in which neither subjects nor investigators are aware of treatment assignments
pulmonary dz is more common in coal workers than the general population - however, people who work in coal mines are also smoke more frequently than the general population
type of bias?
confounding bias (factor related to both the exposure + outcome and distorts the effect of the exposure on outcome)
early detection = increased survival
type of bias?
lead time bias - early detection shows increased survival, even though the natural history of the disease has not changed
SD
how much variability exists from the mean in a set of values “spread”
SEM
measure of how accurate the means is relative to the real mean (measure of CONFIDENCE in the sample mean)
= SD/√n
1 SD =
contains 68% of values
2 SD =
contains 95% of values
3 SD =
contains 99.7% of values
Type I error (α)
what is it?
what is it also known as?
stating that there IS a difference/effect when none exists
(null hypothesis IS incorrectly rejected)
aka fαlse + error
α = you sαw a difference that did not exist
Type II error (ß)
what is it?
what is it also known as?
stating that there is NOT an difference/effect when one exists (null hypothesis is NOT rejected when it is in fact false)
aka false - error
ß = ßlind to difference that exist (setting a guilty man free)