EOS 335 Flashcards

(612 cards)

1
Q

John Dalton

A

all matter consists of atoms

1806

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

William Prout

A

Law of Constant Proportions

1815

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Law of Constant Proportions

A

atomic weights are integral multiples of the mass of hydrogen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why the Law of Constant Proportions does not always hold

A

elements with isotopes do not have integer weights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

N

A

number of neutrons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Z

A

number of protons

atomic number

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A

A

mass number

N + Z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

M

A

atomic mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

I

A

neutron excess number
N - Z
3H excess = 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Isotope

A

same number of protons different number of neutrons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Isobars

A

same mass number

N + Z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Isotone

A

same # neutrons, different # protons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

amu

A

atomic mass unit
dalton
defined by 12C = 12 amu
931.5 MeV of energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of nucleosynthesis

A

Big Bang nucleo.
Stellar nucleo.
Explosive nucleo.
Cosmic ray spallation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Big Bang nucleosynthesis

A

primordial nucleons formed from quark-gluon plasma
first few 100µs
once cooled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

length of nucleosynthesis

A

about 17minutes

after that T and density of universe too low for fusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Nuclear synthesis of C, O, etc.

A
in stars (Stellar nucleo.?) by nuclear fusion or nuclear fission 
up to Fe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

formation of elements heavier than Fe

A
neutron capture (s-, r-processes)
fusion of Fe w/ other elements must absorb E rather than release it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

simplest atom

A

proteon
1H
stable
most abundant isotope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

hydrogen isotopes

A

1H - proteon, stable, most common (Z = 1, N = 0)
2H - deuterium, stable (Z=1, N=1)
3H - tritium, unstable, (Z=1, N=2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

atom diameter

A

about ca. 10^-8 cm (1 Å)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

size of nuclei of atom

A

ca. 10^-12 cm (10^-4 Å)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

e-

A

electron number - # of electrons in atom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

neutral atom

A

Z = e-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Binding energy vs. mass number
binding energy per nucleon (MeV) as a fn of Mass Number, A Increases straight up, curves to the right = fusion = formation of elements up to (including) Fe after Fe line is mostly straight across, goes down a bit after A = 110 = Fission
26
fusion
2+ atomic nuclei form 1+ different atomic nuclei and subatomic particles (neutrons and/or protons) Difference in mass between products and reactants = release of large amounts of energy
27
fission
large nuclei breaks apart into two smaller nuclei, releasing a great deal of energy
28
most tightly bound nucleus
Fe - 8.8 MeV per nucleon binding energy
29
Isotope notation
^A X | e.g. superscript 13 C = mass number 13, 7 N, 6Z
30
nuclide
a distinct kind of atom or nucleus characterized by a specific number of protons and neutrons
31
nuclear isomer
same nuclide, different energy state
32
types of isotopes
radioactive stable radiogenic
33
radioactive isotopes
spontaneously and predictably change atomic mass
34
stable isotopes
do not undergo any decay
35
radiogenic isotopes
may be radioactive or stable | a nuclide that is produced by a process of radioactive decay
36
Neutron number vs proton number for stable nuclides
follows 1:1 only up to ca. Z = 20-30 N increase more rapidly than Z need more N for heavier elements to be stable
37
Nuclear force
holds nucleus together more powerful than electromagnetic force only over VERY short distance
38
radius of nucleon
ca. 10^-13 cm
39
radius of 4He nucleus
ca. 2*10^-13 cm
40
radius of 4He atom
ca. 10^-8 cm
41
Nucleon radius vs force
small radius = repulsion medium radius = attraction large radius = 0
42
Segré chart
protons vs # neutrons stability in the middle - darker decreasing stability in both directions out from the dark middle top right is completely unstable and many undiscovered
43
Known nuclides
ca. 3000 ca. 275 stable, 270 in nature ca. 70 unstable (radioactive)
44
nuclei are stable on what timescale
>10^15 yrs to
45
Proton/Neutron energy levels
have energy levels like electrons Z:N stability depends on energy levels even numbers most stable
46
unstable configurations
eventually decay to more stable ones | alpha or beta decay and other processes
47
magic numbers of protons/neutrons
2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126
48
what are magic numbers
magic # of nucleons = higher average binding energy per nucleon more stable against decay analogous to filled shells of electrons (e.g. noble gas)
49
why are there magic numbers
thought that nuclei do not homogenize, stick their component groups like friends in a class
50
valley of stability
atoms at edge of parabola most unstable (dripline) | centre of parabola stable, atoms w/ highest nuclear binding energy
51
cross-section across valley of stability
parabola of binding energies | like x-section (isobar) across Segré chart - low stability, high, low
52
why are atoms on the dripline most unstable
large amounts of energy are released by their decay | β decay
53
how are isotopes useful in geoscience
relative Pb proportions tell Earths age | U-Th-Pb measurements used to determine age of crystals
54
how Lb is used to determine age of Earth
relative proportions of Pb isotopes in meteorites used as proxy age inferred from Earths bulk Pb isotope composition determining the age of something paleotemperature from ice cores tracers of present processes
55
Age of Earth
ca. 4.56 bya
56
t = 0 for Earth
when it 'coalesced' | somewhat arbitrary
57
using isotopes to tell the age of the ocean
measure 14C ratios 14C comes from atmosphere (fossil fuels) tells how long since water was at surface
58
Isotopes as tracers of present processes, migration
you are what you eat | can track butterfly migration from rainwater source
59
nucleon
proton or neutron in nucleus
60
atomic mass
number of nucleons
61
fermi
10 ^ -15 m
62
strong force
extremely short-range force between nucleons
63
alpha particle
helium nucleus, commonly emitted in radioactive disintigration
64
beta particle
electron, emitted in some radioactive disintegrations
65
gamma ray
a high-energy photon electromagnetic radiation extremely harmful to living organisms
66
geiger counter
device for measuring radioactivity
67
scintillation counter
device for measuring radioactivity
68
MRI
magnetic resonance imaging | based on energy levels of H nucleus
69
N(t)
population at time t
70
A(t)
activity | number of disintegrations per second
71
becquerel
one disintegration per second
72
curie
another unit of activity | number of disintegrations/s/g radium
73
protons expel each other by
coulombic (electrostatic) force
74
how do we know nuclear force/strong force has to only act at very short distances
otherwise all matter would collapse into a single nucleus
75
nuclear force is mediate by
the pion
76
Pion
type of meson | can exist for a short amount of time
77
meson
intermediate mass particles which are made up of a quark-antiquark pair
78
mass decrement of an atom
``` δm = W - M W = sum of mass of constituent particle (e.g. 6 protons + 6 neutrons + 6 electrons) M = actual mass of atom ```
79
binding energy
the mass converted to energy binding the nucleons measure of nuclear stability E=δmc^2
80
magic number features
isotopes and isotopes w/ m.n. are unusually common | m.n. nuclides unusually abundant in nature
81
heaviest stable nuclides
N=126 | Z =83
82
number of stable nuclei for odd and even Z and N
``` Z-N # odd-odd 4 odd-even 50 even-odd 55 even-even 165 ```
83
10^-11 seconds after the Big Bang
universe expanded and cooled enough for quarks and anti-quarks to condense from energy
84
10^-4 seconds after the Big Bang
cool enough for quarks to associate with each other and form nucleons
85
10^-2 seconds after the Big Bang
universe cooled to 10^11 | neutrinos combined with neutrons to form electrons and protons
86
s-process
slow neutron capture | neutrons captured slowly (ca. 1000yrs) to produce successively heavier elements, in late generation stars
87
r-process
rapid neutron capture | tends to form the heavier isotopes
88
Antoine-Henri Becquerel
discovered radioactivity placed U salts on photographic plates produced image by beta particles
89
Marie and Pierre Curie
discovered polonium and radium by chemical separation from ores
90
Ernest Rutherford
discovered alpha and beta particles | showed that radioactivity involved transformation of an element in to an entirely different one
91
J.J. Thomson
discovered the electron | invented the first mass spec. -- gave clear evidence of two isotopes of Ne
92
lowest # element that has natural decay
52 Te Tellurium
93
Protons and neutrons are composed of
3 quarks Proton - 2 up quarks, 1 down quark Neutron - 1 up quark, 2 down quarks
94
Stable isotope distribution
relatively mixed in top 5 rows of periodic table | 83-118 have no stable configurations (Period 7 and Actinide series)
95
Proton number vs neutron number, decay
stable region in middle proton > neutron = beta + decay proton
96
Isotope half-life distribution
>10^15s in the middle | half-life decreases out in each direction from middle
97
Primary modes of radioactive decay
Alpha decay | Beta decay - positron decay, negatron decay, electron capture
98
Other forms of decay that we will not worry about
gamma decay proton decay cluster decay
99
Alpha decay is predominantly
in higher atomic number elements | also in Li, Be
100
Nuclide chart
normal plot of Z vs N shows radioactive decay processes nuclide has coordinates Z, N decay will change coordinates
101
Alph decay
spontaneous emission of alpha particle from nucleon | occurs for nuclides with atomic number > 58 and 5He, 5Li, 6B
102
what is happening during alpha decay
a He nucleus is emitted (2protons, 2 neutrons) no electrons expelled change in mass change in E = heat
103
change in parent from alpha decay
Z - 2 N - 2 A - 4 daughter product
104
mass difference between 2Z+2N and 1 alpha particle
equivalent to energy lost in alpha decay: kinetic energy of alpha particle kinetic energy of remaining nucleus - conservation of momentum and nucleus recoil) gamma ray emitted
105
standard model (element formation)
quark - meson (2quarks), baryon (3q) (both hadrons) baryon -- protons, neutrons meson -- pion lepton - electron, muon, tau, neutrinos
106
In nuclide chart what is the direction of change associated with alpha decay
left two, down two | Z - 2, N - 2
107
why does alpha decay only occur at high atomic numbers
nuclei must have masses above maximum in binding energy curve (56Fe)
108
proton mass
1.00728 u
109
neutron mass
1.00866 u
110
mass of alpha particle
4.00153 (but 2protons + 2neutrons = 4.03188) mass difference is converted energy
111
238U alpha decay
238,92U -- 234,90Th + 4,2He + Q A - 4 Z - 2
112
alpha decay branched reactions
may not go to lowest energy state right away intermediate levels are unstable may evolve gamma emission depends on where the alpha particle is coming from in the nucleus
113
beta decay
changes charge of nucleus does not change # of nucleons daughter product is an isobar emission of electron or positron
114
types of beta decay
negatron decay positron decay electron capture
115
beta decay stability valley
stable nuclei exist in energy valley α-decay moves nucleus down valley axis β-decay moves nucleus down walls toward valley axis, depends on which side of the valley the parent lies (Z>N on left)
116
Negatron decay
β- decay tranform neutron into proton + electron (N -- P + e-) emission of β- from nucleon, antineutrino, energy, γ-ray
117
results of β- decay
Z + 1 N - 1 A = A
118
movement on nuclide chart from negatron decay
up 1, left 1
119
40K negatron decay
40,19K -- 40,20Ca + β- + v^ + Q Z + 1 A = A
120
Negatron decay daughter
gains one proton, Z + 1 | same atomic number as parent, isobaric
121
Positron decay
β+ decay transformation of proton into neutron emission of +charged electron (positron, β+) from nucleon, neutrinos, radiant energy, gamma rays
122
results of β+ decay
Z - 1 N + 1 A = A
123
40K β+ decay
40,19K -- 40,18Ar + β+ + v + Q
124
movement on nuclide chart from positron decay
right 1, down 1 | Isobaric
125
Electron capture
capture of extranuclear electron (e.g. K-shell capture) electron reacts with a proton, forms neutron + neutrino isobaric decay
126
results of electron capture
Z - 1 N + 1 A = A same as β+ decay
127
how electron capture is fundamentally different than β+ decay
neutralize a charge rather than throwing it out
128
why is there lots of harmful rays associated with electron capture
excited state = gamma rays | replacement of lost electron = x-rays
129
125I electron capture
125,53I + e- -- 125,52Te + v + Q Z - 1 A = A
130
movement on nuclide chart from electron capture
``` down 1 right 1 Z - 1 A = A same as β+ decay ```
131
Adjacent isobars
can not be stable (up/down 1, over 1) | atomic number difference must be > 1
132
two isobars have
different masses | different binding energies
133
one isobar is converted in to another by
β decay
134
stable isobars
must be separate by a radioactive isobar
135
branching decay
decay of isotope by different methods to 2 or more different daughters e.g. 40K -- 40Ar by β+ decay, or to 40Ca by β- decay ratio of decay directions is fixed daughters are diagonal in each direction away from parent on nuclide chart
136
branched decay equation
40,19K -- 40,18Ar (+ β+ + e-) + 40,20Ca (+ β-) + Q
137
atomic numbers of daughters for the 4 decay processes
alpha = Z - 2 EC = Z - 1 beta + = Z - 1 beta - = Z + 1
138
U decay series
3 clocks - 238U, 235U, 232Th U (or Th) is rate determining step multiple alpha and beta decay steps to reach stability paths of the diff. clocks do not overlap
139
238U decays to
206Pb 8 alpha decays (length of chain) 6 beta decays
140
235U decays to
207Pb 7 alpha decays (chain length) 4 beta decays
141
232Th decays to
206Pb 6 alpha decays (chain length) 4 beta decays
142
decay end member features
stable | high enough in atomic number to be able to avoid contamination
143
semimetals
B, Si, Ge, As, Sb, Te
144
non-metals
noble gases halogens C, N, O, P, S, Se
145
halogens
group 17 beside noble gases F, Cl, Br, I, At
146
noble gases
period 18 | He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn
147
mass spectrometer
separates atoms or molecules according to mass | basic parts: ion source, mass analyzer, detector
148
application of radioactive isotopes
``` geochronology tracers medical imaging - trace, treatment energy weapons ```
149
radioactive isotopes, tracers
agriculture - plant fertilizers industry - engine parts geo-processes and characters
150
elements that make good radioactive models
not extremely short or long 1/2t common enough for use well represented in typical rock groups, abundant
151
Law of radioactivity, Rutherford and Soddy
rate of decay of radioactive nuclides is proportional to # of that nuclide remaining at any time (t) lots of parent = faster decay
152
Basic Decay Equation (exponential decay)
-dN/dt ∝ N_t | λ is proportionality constant so -dN/dt = λN_t
153
variables in basic decay equation
``` N = number of nuclides that will decay (parent) -dN/dt = rate of decay λ = decay constant (time^-1) λN = activity (A) or 'rate of decay' ```
154
λ
decay constant probability a given constant will decay at time t typically independent of T, P experimentally determined, accepted by consensus, not empirical
155
integrating basic decay equation
-dN/dt = λN -dN/N = λdt -∫dN/N = λ∫dt -lnN = λt + C at t_0 N = N_0 -- C = -lnN_0 -lnN = λt - lnN_0
156
N_0
N at t=0 all parent is still present no decay has taken place yet
157
Standard/Basic decay equation, working form
N = N_0 e^-λt
158
half life
``` time required for half of radio-nuclides to decay t = T_1/2, N = No/2 No/2 = No e^-λT_1/2 1/2 = e^-λT_1/2 -ln(2) = -λT_1/2 T_1/2 = ln2 / λ ```
159
rate of decay is proportional to
N (amount of parent nuclides) larger N = more decay rate decreases exponentially
160
half life working equation
T1/2 = ln2/λ
161
max number of 1/2 lives
5-10 | >5 half lives and theres likely not enough parent left for data analysis
162
low N
lower activity lower decay lower quality data - less accuracy
163
14C T1/2
5730 yrs | exhausted in ca. 70kyr
164
40K T1/2
1.28Gyr | good for dating 10kyr - 100's Myr
165
238U T1/2
4.47Gyr | used to date Myr to Gyr
166
growth of stable daughter
``` D* = No - N D* = No - No e^-λt D* = No (1 - e^-λt) D* = how much daughter produced with none present initially ```
167
example of when D* is an alright assumption
K-Ar dating, Ar is a gas and therefore escapes before rock solidifies
168
Growth curve of daughter
number of atoms vs. time, half lives exponentially increasing opposite to decay curve, exponentially decreasing
169
Geochronology equation
``` D* = N(e^λt - 1) D = Do + N(e^λt - 1) ```
170
If there is daughter material to start with that is not accounted for
rock will 'appear' older than it is
171
Graphing D = Do + N (e^λt -1 )
87Sr = 87Sro + 87Rb (e^λt - 1) y (D) = c (Do) + mx (e^λt - 1)(N) 87Sr is y axis, 87Rb is x, (e^λt - 1) is slope, 87Sro is intercept If 87Sro = D* = no daughter to begin with, then intercept is at 0 If 87Sro≠D* then there was daughter to start with
172
How to graphing D = Do + N (e^λt -1 )
take multiple samples in same outcrop rock heterogeneity will give different values plot all the values (parent, daughter) if rocks are same age, should plot along straight line and have same to
173
In graphing D = Do + N (e^λt -1 ), the slope (e^λt -1 ) is what
an isochron | it means all rocks that plot along that line have the same age
174
overcoming mass spec measurement constraints
difficult to measure amounts discretely so isotope measurements are generally made as ratios (R) use stable, nonradiogenic isotope for normalization
175
87Sr normalization for mass spectrometry
86Sr is the stable isotope = normalizer R = Ro + R_P/D (e^λt - 1) 87Sr/86Sr = 87Sro/86Sro + 87Rb/86Sr (e^λt - 1) just divide each term by the normalizer normalizer must be common and not in the decay system 86Sro should technically = 86Sr (Stable)
176
R P/D plot
``` R = Ro + R_P/D (e^λt - 1) y = c + xm y is the 'now' ratio x is the Parent/Daughter (e^λt - 1) is the slope = isochron c is the intercept ```
177
Assumptions for R vs. P/D plots
isotopic equilibrium of system at t=0, i.e. homogeneous value of Ro, generally thermal/diffusional constraint (blocking T) closed system, i.e. no loss or gain of material (parent or daughter) with time
178
Rb-Sr commonly used to date
Rb-rich minerals: muscovite, biotite, k-feldspar | these minerals do not incorporate much Sr at time of formation
179
Rb-Sr dating compared with K-Ar
Rb-Sr has a greater blocking T - usually gives somewhat older age thank K-Ar (minerals formed slightly later) minerals form at cooler T according to Bowens reaction series
180
Using isochron method for Rb-Sr
plot multiple rock samples 87Sr/86Sr vs 87Rb/86Sr at to should be a horizontal line wait... plot values again at t1 wait.. plot again at t2 should plot co-linearly to the same intercept (if same age)
181
In isochron dating methods why does the isochron become more steep with time?
increasing across x-axis we have rock A, B, C rock A has the lowest N (initial amount of parent) so its Activity will be lowest rock C has highest N which equals larger A more atoms = more decay the daughter product from rock C is increasing faster than the daughter product from rock A
182
blocking T
temperature below which a mineral becomes a closed chemical system for a specific radioactive decay series
183
what do we get from the isochron dating method
the age of the rock (from the slope) | the initial value, Ro (from the intercept)
184
what does it mean for rocks to be co-genetic
derived from same parent material
185
how do we know if rocks are co-genetic
same, single initial isotope ratio, Ro
186
Assumptions in radiometric dating
N, D have changed only as a result of radioactive decay (closed system) there was an isotopic equilibrium within the system at the outset (homogenous 87Sr/86Sr) Parent isotope composition not altered by fractionation at time of formation of rock decay constant is known accurately the isochron is not a mixing line the analytical data are accurate
187
disintegration rate
``` A ≡ λ N also activity can be measured with scintillation counter A = Ao e^-λt ln A = ln Ao - λt y = c +mx ```
188
Problems with isochrons
two sets of rocks with same age may have different Ro difficult to fit lines of best fit metamorphic events after formation of rocks
189
Meaningful isochrons require
``` large P/D (e.g. 87Rb/87Sr of 5) large range in P/D in suite or minerals (i.e., Ca + K minerals) closed system homogenous D no fluids and/or metamorphic resetting ```
190
dN/dt depends on
number of nuclides available to decay λ is fixed -dN/dt = λN_t
191
why K-Ca-Ar work focus on Ar
40K/40Ar ratio much higher than 40K/40Ca | Easier to measure differences
192
Why is 40K/40Ca ratio so low (0.00011)
40K least abundant K isotope (0.012%) 40Ca most abundance Ca isotope (96.92%) Ca is more abundant than K 40K has one of shortest t1/2 of long-lived radio isotopes ∴ ratio is small, signal is hard to detect
193
Potassium
K, Z = 19 alkali metal, group 1A (w/ Li, Na, Rb, Ce) 1 of 8 most abundant crust elements key component in rock forming minerals
194
K isotopes
39K - stable, 93.3% 40K - radiogenic, 0.012% 41K - stable, 6.73%
195
Argon
Ar, Z = 18 noble gas, group 8 (w/ He, Xe) mostly gaseous in atmos.
196
Ar isotopes
40Ar - 99.6% (radiogenic) 38Ar - 0.063% 36Ar - 0.337% all stable
197
Ar tracer
36Ar - not formed from decay | 40Ar/36Ar = 295.5 - any deviation = radioactivity
198
K branching decay
40K --> 40Ar + ß+ (positron, e.c.) | 40K --> 40Ca + ß- (negatron)
199
40K --> 40Ar
electron capture + gamma rays (11%, 1.46MeV) e.c. directly to ground state (0.16%) positron + 2gamma (0.001%) total ∆E=1.51MeV
200
40K --> 40Ca
negatron emission (∆E = 1.32MeV, 88.8%)
201
K-Ar-Ca λ
λ_T = λec (Ar) + λ_ß (Ca)
202
fraction of 40K that goes to 40Ca, 40Ar
``` 40Ca = λ_ß / λ_T*40K 40Ar = λ_ec / λ_T*40K ```
203
branching ratio
R = λ_ec / λ_ß = 0.0117
204
K-Ar-Ca equations w/ no initial daughter
40Ar* + 40Ca* = 40K(e^λ_t - 1) 40Ar* = (λ_ec/λ)40K(e^λ_t - 1) 40Ca* = (λ_ß/λ)40K(e^λ_t - 1)
205
40Ar_0
often assume Ar_initial = 0 b/c gas escapes to atmosphere
206
K-Ar benefits
Ar is noble gas - escapes, volatile, not bound in lattice | can measure Ar-Ar
207
Measuring 40K/40Ar
40Ar - melt rock - measure gas composition w/ MS | 40K -sample content measured by flame photometry, atomic absorption, ICPMS
208
key principle behind K-Ar dating
40K/40Ar ratio related to t since rock was cool enough to trap Ar
209
Rock-forming minerals suitable for dating by K-Ar
feldspars, micas, amphibole (hornblende)
210
K-Ar assumptions
40K decays independent of P, T 40K/K_T constant in nature 40Ar* produced by in situ 40K decay since crystallization corrections can be made for nonradiogenic 40Ar sample in closed system since t_o - i.e. no losses or gains
211
violation example of 40Ar* produced by in situ 40K decay since crystallization assumption
partial melting
212
corrections for nonradiogenic 40Ar
36Ar from atmos. not decay - amount diffused in is proportional to 40Ar that diffused in (contamination) 40Ar/36Ar = 295.5
213
K-Ar additional assumptions
1 no 40Ar* has escaped 2 mineral closed quickly to 40Ar* after formation 3 no 40Ar_initial or 40Ar incorporated later 4 correction for atmos. 40Ar* leak into mineral 5 normal 39K, 40K, 41K abundances, no fractionation during formation 6 λ, λ_ec, λ_ß accurately known 7 [40K], 40Ar* accurately determined
214
40Ar* escape
``` remelting solution/precipitation alteration mechanical weathering metamorphism burial P/T ```
215
40Ar* is measured how
on mass spec by isotope dilution - enriched with 38Ar so there is enough material to measure 40Ar/38Ar 38Ar/36Ar (to correct for atmos. contamination)
216
Correction for Ar contamination
40Ar* = 40Ar_t - (295.5)(36Ar) | note that if there is no contamination 40Ar* = 40Ar_t
217
Ar example, why you need large # samples
Radiogenic 40Ar content vs. distance inward from pillow rim | decrease in 40Ar inward from rim - 40Ar contamination added to pillow rim
218
40Ar/36Ar vs 40K/36Ar R-P/D plot, y-intercept
y-int = (40Ar/36Ar)o = initial ratio = atmospheric contamination
219
Ar diffusion
K-Ar thermally reset if T high enough to allow Ar diffusion
220
Ar diffusion dependent on
``` diffusion coefficient (D) - material dependent temperature (T) E_a = activation energy Arrhenius equation: D = Do * e^(-E_a / RT) ```
221
Ar diffusion consideration
closure T cooling rate, closure rate dependence on mineral used for dating
222
Diffusion of Ar, Temperature
higher T = faster diffusion (good) in melted rock - 36Ar should escape in cool rock Ar should stay put
223
Ar Blocking temperature
T wt which mineral becomes 'closed' w.r.t. Ar loss
224
Problem w/ Ar blocking T
date obtained will be less than true age unless rock cooled very rapidly
225
blocking T dependent on
diffusion cooling rate grain size grain shape
226
87Sr normalized by
86Sr
227
87Sr parent
87Rb
228
40Ar normalized by
36Ar
229
radiogenic argon
40Ar accumulated from decay of 40K also 39Ar but very short t_1/2
230
non-radiogenic argon
blank, trapped, cosmogenic, neutron induced Ar | not from decay
231
Relic Ar
40Ar | remains following partial resetting (partial melting) event
232
Blank argon
unavoidable surgical Ar introduced into MS
233
excess Ar
all contamination
234
trapped Ar
incorporated within mineral | atmospheric Ar w/ or w/o an excess 40Ar component (e.g. H2O)
235
Excess Ar
released from older K-bearing minerals | typically during heating event - trapped as mineral cools
236
Atmospheric argon
Ar from EARTHs atmosphere (different extraterrestrially) | 40Ar/36Ar = 295.5
237
Neutron-induced Ar
produced by irradiation of sample in nuclear reactor | mostly synthetic
238
Inherited argon
radiogenic + non-radiogenic Ar introduced by contamination w/ older material (e.g. inclusions)
239
Argon gains
1. Inherited, 40Ar/36Ar greater than 295.5, overestimate of age 2. 40Ar doesn't escape during thermal event - redistributed - disproportionately situated on crystal edges - amongst first to diffuse out during weathering
240
Argon Losses
1. Extended cooling period - enhanced differences in edges 2. Differential diffusional loss during reheating 3. In 39K(n,p)39Ar, 39Ar lost from crystal rim during recoil following radiation underestimation of true age
241
Trouble with K-Ar
chemical differences | measured differently
242
avoiding K-Ar problems
Use 39Ar as 39K proxy by irradiating sample - turn K into Ar | 39K(n,p)39Ar
243
benefit to using 39Ar as proxy for 39K
measured in same machine at same time | can also measure 36Ar at same time to correct for Ar*
244
Argon step heating
In situ conversion of 39K - 39Ar incremental heating of sample over 'total fusion' allows liberation of Ar in stages melt sample from outside-in
245
benefit of step-wise heating
permits age determination and identification of domains
246
sample domains
anomalous zones/region e.g. outside edge of sample may be different than inside if sample closed throughout history no discrete domains, age same at each increment
247
step-heating spectrum corrected for
non-radiogenic 40Ar (at every step) using atmospheric ratio from 36Ar measured
248
result of step heating correction
excess 40Ar not detected | all 40Ar not corrected for is assumed to be from decay
249
Ar release spectra of samples taken at varying distances from intrusion
intrusion = heating = Ar loss samples closest to intrusion show lowest age corresponding with Ar loss If no plateau is reached in spectral image than data not trustworthy
250
Schematic 40Ar-39Ar age spectra representations
undisturbed - flat line (1 age) slight disturbance - initial step is lower, increases to plateau disturbed - no plateau over spectra reset - plateau in first stages then increase saddle-shape - presence of excess 40Ar
251
Ar plots
heating plots/heating release spectra Isochron plot inverse isochron plot
252
Ar inverse isochron plot
36Ar/40Ar vs 39Ar/40Ar like isochron plot, does not assume non-radiogenic 40Ar/36Ar ratio, can be useful for recognizing excess 40Ar in addition to atmos. Ar higher precision than isochron plot more commonly used (than isochron plot)
253
measured value in stepwise heating
(40Ar/39Ar)m = 40Ar* + 40Ar_c / 36Ar radiogenic (40Ar*) contamination (40Ar_c) - atmospheric and Ar entering system since closure
254
Why inverse isochron has lower error
[39Ar] is lower than [40Ar] -- any measurement inaccuracy in 39Ar/40Ar will produce large error
255
'pure' radiogenic component of Ar
where 36Ar/40Ar = 0 | 36Ar is not formed radiogenically
256
extrapolating on inverse isochron plot
where 39Ar/40Ar = 0 gives trapped, non-radiogenic component 39Ar ∝ 39K and 40K corresponds to 40K/40Ar = 0
257
Data in inverse isochron plot represent
diff T steps from one mineral (if step-heating) | or diff. spots w/i one mineral (if laser-ablation)
258
inverse isochron plot, measurements w/ high radiogenic component
will plot close to 39Ar/40Ar axis
259
Measurements of Earths age
``` Biblical - 6016yrs Lord Kelvin, heat flow, 1862 - 20-400Ma John Joly, Ocean Na, 1899, 80-100Ma Rutherford (radioactive decay), 1913 - >400Ma Hubble, 1929, 2Ga Patterson (Pb isotopes), 1953, 4.55Ga ```
260
How John Joly calculated age of Earth
how much weathering must have had to occur for the Na in the ocean didn't account for evaporites
261
µ
238U/204Pb
262
238U/235U
137.88
263
κ
232Th/238U
264
238 decay
238U -- 206Pb + 8(4He) + 6ß- + Q | ∆E = 47.4 MeV
265
235 decay
235U --> 207Pb + 7(4He) + 4ß- + Q | ∆E = 45.2 MeV
266
ω
232Th/204Pb
267
232 decay
232Th --> 208Pb + 6(4He) + 4ß- + Q | ∆E = 39.8MeV
268
Early methods for U, Th decay
chemical method - assume all Pb in mineral/rock is radiogenic (often invalid) Pb-alpha method - optical spectroscopy to measure Pb, alpha-counting to measure U, Th U-He method - assumes U, Th minerals retain He released by decay (not always valid)
269
Current U, Th methods
U, Th-Pb isotopic method or concordia | Common-lead (Pb-Pb) method
270
Uranium
high incompatible - large ionic radii, large charge mobile among last species to crystallize out concentrates in crustal rocks
271
thorium
high incompatible element - large ionic radii, large charge | relatively immobile
272
U, Th minerals
Zircon (more U) Monazite (more Th) Apatite
273
zircons
abundant chemically resistant incorporate U, Th
274
Pb
incompatible | immobile except at low pH and high T
275
Pb minerals
Galena substitutes for K in feldspar, biotite sulphides (come out of hydrothermal vents)
276
U, Th level of incompatibility
U more than Th more than Pb
277
homogeneous loss
238U/235U remains constant, 238U is lost in the same ratio as 235U this relationship does not hold for U or Pb gains
278
U, Th rate determining step
parent is rate determining - by far longest 1/2 life
279
matching parents with daughters, U, Th, Pb
238U 235U 232Th 206Pb 207Pb 208Pb even-even odd-odd smallest-largest
280
Secular equilibium
T_1/2 parent much greater than T_1/2 daughter | e.g. 10-1000X
281
equilibrium
quantity of radioactive daughter isotope remains constant b/c decay rate = production rate from parent decay
282
transient equilibrium
T_1/2 parent greater than T_1/2 daughter | e.g. few X's
283
main difference btw transient, secular equilibrium
10 half-lives of daughter: Secular - essentially no parent decay takes place Transient - significant parent decay takes place
284
secular equilibrium characteristics
no initial (or fixed initial) radioactive daughter (rd) material if no initial then no initial rd decay rd forms at ca. constant rate from parent no substantial loss of parent over time decay of rd once material is accumulated increased rd material = increased activity activity increases until it reach rate of formation after ^ amount remains constant over time (equilibrium)
285
why does increased material = increased decay
A Ξ λN activity is proportional to amount if you have more you can lose more, probability of any one particle decaying increases
286
time to reach specific A (activity)
dependent on λ
287
after n half lives, activity will be
f - some faction of rate of formation or saturation activity | f = 1 - (1/2) ^n
288
Secular equilibrium rule of thumb
Secular equilibrium is typically reached by 4-5 half lives of the daughter
289
real-life example of secular equilibrium
ca. half of U created at creation of universe is left | only Ra that exists today is a result of U decay
290
Transient equilibrium characteristics
parent will undergo significant decay A_d will increase and establish eq. w/ parent activity A_d ≠ A_p; A_d = A_p * T_p / (T_p - T_d) as T_d approaches T_p, A_d > A_p - transition eq. at transition- A_d, A_p change w/ time once transition equil. attained daughter decays according to T_p
291
T_p
T_1/2 parent | T_d = T_1/2 daughter
292
If T_p >> T_d
A_d = A_p | secular
293
Transition equilibrium
typically reached quicker than secular equilibrium
294
Initial lead values on earth
known from meteorites 206Pb/204Pb = 17.21 207Pb/204Pb = 15.78 208Pb/204Pb = 37.43
295
238U half life
4.468x10^9 yrs 4,468,000,000 yrs 4.468Ga
296
235U half life
0.7038x10^9 yrs 703,800,000 yrs 703Ma
297
232Th half life
14.010x10^9 yrs 14,010,000,000yrs 14Ga
298
elements in U, Th decay series
3 series 12 elements 43 isotopes no overlap
299
changes in 207Pb, 206Pb with time
as rock ages, 207 grows faster 207/206 vs time = increasing hyperbola 235U decays faster
300
concordant
if ages obtained from independent U, Th Pb chronometers are the same (usually do not agree- discordant)
301
Dicordancy often a result of
Pb loss intermediate daughter loss caused by radiation damage from alpha decay
302
common lead method
206-207 method Pb-Pb method combine 2 U-Pb geochronometers lessen effects of open-system
303
Pb-Pb method characteristics
does no assume Pb_0 is insignificant | often yields older date than individual system - ratio of Pb isotopes not as sensitive to Pb loss
304
why is Pb-Pb ratio not as sensitive to Pb loss
losses tend to be isotopically homogeneous
305
238U/235U
137.88
306
Pb-Pb system
207Pb/206Pb = (e^λ_235t - 1) / 137.88(e^λ_238t - 1) too complex to solve- L'Hopital use Wetherill table
307
what we can see from Pb-Pb equation
only dependent on age | not on P/D b/c that is a fixed ratio
308
Why Pb-Pb type system is not often used with Th
U, Th different elements - different behaviours, processes | unequal gain/loss
309
Pb-Pb system value
∆-relationship does not assume negligible/small starting Pb not affected by recent alteration (Pb-loss or U-loss) only Pb addition or aging after alteration affects measured age
310
Why is Pb-Pb method not affected by Pb-loss or U-loss
depends only on ratios not []'s
311
232Th-238U method
similar equation to Pb-Pb method different elements, behave differently - unequal loss/gain works if kappa is constant (not given)
312
Where does U come from
supernova (collapsing star) - high E - accretion on to planet
313
238U half life
4.468Ga
314
Pb-Pb equation
207Pb*/206Pb* = (e^λ_235*t -1)/137.88 (e^λ_238*t -1)
315
Where did Pb come from
R&S processes decay super-enriched in crust due to decay
316
Where is U on Earth
enriched in crust relative to mantle | incompatible - stays in melt longer - doesn't want to crystallize
317
Closure temperature
blocking T | pt where system becomes 'closed'
318
A system is open if
T is is high enough for atoms to diffuse in/out of crystals
319
Blocking T depends on
``` compatibility duration of heating grain size pore fluids mineral chemistry ```
320
Example blocking T's
``` U-Pb, zircon- >900ºC U-Pb, titanite- >650ºC Sm-Nd, garnet- 600ºC U-Pb, apatite- 500º K-Ar, hornblende- 500º Rb-Sr, feldspar, biotite- 500º ```
321
If T_1/2 of daughter is greater than T_1/2 of parent
equilibrium will never be reached
322
238U/235U
137.88
323
Homogenous loss
isotopes lost in the same proportions as in the rock before losses, e.g. Pb
324
If closed system, 207Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb
= straight line
325
207Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb shape of growth curve
distance point moves along the line | 238U/204Pb (µ)
326
mineral suitable for U-Th-Pb methods
Zircon
327
what is needed in a mineral for U-Th-Pb methods
retain radiogenic Pb | be common
328
why zircon?
retain radiogenic Pb- resistant to mechanical/chemical weathering, metamorphism, remains closed system, robust be common - found in igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary
329
Zircons in sedimentary
do not tell age of sedimentary deposit! they are inclusions
330
Kober-method
single zircon Pb evaporation | hit Zircon w/ high T - vaporize - 2step heating
331
why 2-step heating is necessary for zircon
rim most likely to lose Pb or have overgrowth (Ga weathering) core most likely to preserve Pb isotope signature
332
Zircon formula
ZrSiO4
333
Zircon mineralogy
very hard resistant to weathering permits substitutions of U, Th for Zr concentrates U/ Th, not Pb - high U/Pb
334
Concordia diagram
206Pb*/238U vs 207Pb*/235U both ratios proportional to t basically 238U-206Pb* age vs 235U-207Pb* age
335
Shape of Concordia curve
root curve | initially 207Pb*/235U increases more rapidly, as 235U used up trend inverts 206Pb*/238U increases more quickly
336
When to use Concordia
whenever you can- gold standard | rocks/minerals w/ extremely high 238U/204Pb
337
Why do 207Pb and 206Pb grow at different rates
differences in λ's low abundance of 235U 235U decays much faster (shorter T1/2) - 207 produced faster
338
concordant dates
238U-206Pb age = 235U-207Pb age
339
On Concordia diagram, the locus of all points yielding concordant dates is called
the concordia curve | ages are concordant
340
235U half-life
0.704Ga
341
Why is a Concordia curve not a straight line
207Pb 'grows' faster
342
Any point along Concordia curve
represents equal age
343
evolution of Concordia curve
doesn't just grow along the x-axis like if you were drawing a curve the curve actually moves up the y-axis x-axis is not age
344
What if there is complete Pb loss? (Concordia)
then zircon is reset to time of loss | U-Pb dates can not distinguish a 'reset' zircon from a crystallized zircon
345
232Th half-life
14.01Ga
346
If partial Pb loss in Concordia
data plot on chord that connects true age of zircon w/ age Pb loss occurred - if sufficient data
347
Concordia 'chord'
discordia line
348
Better if Pb loss is continual or episodic
episodic | continual causes greater difficulties, uncertainties
349
Pb gain, Concordia
less likely more difficult - not homogenous cannot be predicted - no specific age relationship makes dates uncertain
350
U gain, Concrdia
similar to Pb loss - discordia line (beneath concordia)
351
Discordia line, intercepts
upper can represent age of formation of rock | lower may represent date of Pb loss if single stage, not continuous
352
Where would Pb gain plot
above Concordia
353
Metamict texture
fracturing in crystal natural radiation damage amorphous crystal increases/allows Pb mobility
354
The location of a point of the Concordia depends on
ONLY age
355
Concordia =
simultaneous coevolution of 206Pb and 207Pb via 238U and 235U decay (respectively)
356
Rocks/minerals that do not plot on the Concordia
yield discordant dates
357
As rocks age (Concordia)
move along concordia (if no Pb, U mobility)
358
If different Zircon samples from same rock lost differing amounts of Pb during same episode
would all plot along discordia
359
decay rate is dependent on
``` # of atoms independent of physical characteristics (T,P) ```
360
activity is measured in
atoms / unit time = disintegration rate = total activity
361
N
number of particles
362
oldest known rock in Canada
4.28Ga bedrock, eastern shore of Hudson Bay Jonathan O'Neil, McGill University Sm/Nd technique
363
2nd oldest known rock in Canada
4.03Ga | Gneiss, NWT
364
Oldest Earth material
Zircon 4.37-4.41Ga Jack Hills, W. Australia
365
oldest cratons
ca. 4.3Ga | - materials older than cratons (e.g. zircons)
366
differentiation of Earth
layering (e.g. mantle, crust, core..)
367
importance of Earths differentiation
understanding ore deposits
368
Earth processes that shape and determine compositional nature of planet
metamorphism, erosion destroy ancient features systems may retain some information
369
Chemical differences between elements
valance state, ionic radius, etc. | lead to differentiation
370
Uranium chemical associations
``` lithophile actinide series incompatible concentrated in lithosphere can substitute for other lithophilic elements ```
371
Lead Goldschmidt classification
chalcophile
372
chalcophile
metals and heavier nonmetals that have low affinity for O and prefer to bond with S as highly insoluble sulfides
373
Rubidium chemical associations
alkali metal (Group 1A) associates w/ Li, Na, K, Ce substitutes for K more incompatible than Sr
374
Strontium chemical associations
Alkali earth (Group IIA) associates w/ Be, Mg, Ca, Ba, Ra Substitutes for Ca (feldspars) more compatible
375
Rb/Sr fractionation
by igneous processes | Rb stays in melt longer - enriches in lithosphere relative to Sr
376
U/Pb, Rb/Sr differences valuable
can explain some of Earth's fractionation processes
377
Value in explaining Earth's fractionation processes, Rb/Sr
differentiation/fractionation of alkali metals from alkali earths
378
Value in explaining Earth's fractionation processes, U/Pb
fact./partitioning of compatible vs incompatible elements
379
Value in explaining Earth's fractionation processes, Sm/Nd
describe events that lead to fractionation of REE
380
Granites
``` lithospheric, surface rocks essential constituent of continental crust mosaic of diff. ages accumulate, brake up, drift 5Ma - 4Ma ```
381
5Ma granites
Andes, Alps, Himalayas
382
Strontium granite ratios
87Sr/86Sr ranges 0.705 - 0.850 not homogenous older rocks have higher ratio (decay)
383
Rubidium granite ratios
87Rb/87Sr range: 0.5 - 3, average 1 | due to incompatibility of Rb
384
Basalts
essential constituent of oceanic crust very young - oldest ca. 200Ma, average 80Ma from high T mantle-melting
385
Basalt Sr ratios
87Sr/86Sr: 0.7020 - 0.7070 | younger rocks
386
Basalt Rubidium ratios
87Rb/87Sr: 0.001 | due to incompatibility of Rb
387
Oceanic Basalts
MORB | OIB
388
MORB
Mid-ocean-ridge basalts upper mantle arises from mid-ocean ridges - spreads - subjected - mantle
389
OIB
Ocean-island basalts lower mantle arises from subaerial volcanism - form island chains, archipelagos
390
upper mantle
depleted mantle material
391
lower mantle
primary, 'bulk earth' material
392
MORB isotope ratios
87Sr/86Sr - narrow range, ca. 0.7025 | 87Rb/87Sr - ca. 0.001
393
OIB isotope ratios
87Sr/86Sr - narrow range, ca. 0.7035 (higher than MORB)
394
Continental crust Sr ratio
87Sr/86Sr - 0.705 - 0.850 (granites)
395
Sm decay
``` 147Sm decays to 143Nd alpha decay (A - 4) T_1/2 = 10^6 years - very long lived ```
396
Sm, Nd characteristics
``` 7 naturally occurring isotopes only 147Sm impacts 143Nd 143Nd is stable both are intermediate REE similar chemical properties Nd enriched in lithosphere relative to Sm ```
397
Sm, Nd similar chemical properties
``` results of identical outer electron shell configuration similar but importantly different ionic radii Sm smaller (1.04Å vs. 1.08Å) ```
398
Sm/Nd ratios
chondritic - 0.32 | present day - 0.1967
399
Nd enriched in lithosphere
more than Sm, opposite of Rb/Sr
400
during fractionation of magma, Sm/Nd
decreases
401
fractionation pathway of igneous rocks
``` ultramafic, deep mantle, high Nd - mafic - intermediate - felsic, continental, crustal, lithospheric, low ratio, low Sm high T (first to crystallize) - - - low T (last to crystallize) ```
402
Early stage Sm/Nd crystallization
mafic igneous high Sm:Nd -close to the 0.32 chondrite end-member calc-alkaline - basalt, andesite, dacite, rhyolite
403
crustal rock Sm/Nd
lower than mantle rocks
404
REE plot
chondrite normalized abundance for REEs MORB ca. straight line around 10 upper continental crust > than MORB (ca.100) for first 3 REEs - decrease - below MORB and straightens out -the decrease points are the radiogenic elements, unique (Nd, Sm)
405
Sm decay equation
143Nd = 143Nd_o + 147Sm(e^λt - 1)
406
Why does Sm/Nd decrease in fractionation
Sm stays in mantle, more compatible
407
Sm/Nd normalized by
non-radiogenic 144Nd
408
Sm-Nd theory
Earth isotopically homogenous at outset - initial 143Nd/144Nd ca. to that in meteorites - deviations btw measured and expected evolution through time
409
CHUR
Chondritic Uniform Reservoir chondritic (stony) meteorites (especially carbonaceous) thought to represent earliest material formed in solar system before planets
410
CHUR used as
approximation of what Earths accretionary composition was 4.6Ga
411
Present CHUR 143Nd/144Nd
0.512638 | = homogenous bulk earth
412
Present CHUR 147Sm/144Nd
0.1967
413
All meteorites have
same age same 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512638 not same 87Sr/86Sr
414
refractory elements
behave coherently, consistently | Sm, Nd, Sr
415
volatile elements
low boiling points that are associated with a planet's or moon's crust and/or atmosphere Rb
416
Using CHUR to determine Earth's differentiation
when lines diverge from CHUR line Partial melt - below CHUR - SM depletion residual solids above CHUR line - Nd, SM enriched
417
143Nd/144Nd above CHUR line
depleted mantle (enriched, Sm more compatible then Nd)
418
143Nd/144Nd below CHUR line
continental crust
419
ε_ND
= [ (143Nd/144Nd)sample - (143Nd/144Nd)chur) / (143Nd/144Nd) ] x10,000 differences in 143Nd/144Nd are small
420
εND for CHUR
= 0
421
εND range
-20 to +14
422
(+) εND
high Sm/Nd high 143Nd/144Nd enriched relative to meteorite/bulk earth
423
Depaolo and Wasserburg
devised εND scale, 1976 easier to express and show differences graph easier to interpret
424
Combining Nd, Sr isotopes
negatively correlated rocks w/ large Sm/Nd variation = mafic, ultramafic, smallest variation = felsic rock Rb/Sr = opposite
425
Nd, Sr incompatibilities
Rb more incomp. than Sr | Nd more incomp. than Sm
426
εND vs 87Sr/86Sr
Bulk earth plots along 0 εND MORB, OIB above and to left of bulk earth (+) CC below and right of b.e. (-)
427
Elemental differentiation, crust
melt Sm/Nd less than 1, depleted in Sm, below b.e. line Rb/Sr greater than 1, enriched in Rb, above b.e. line
428
( - ) εND
low Sm/Nd low 143Nd/144Nd depleted relative to meteorite/bulk earth
429
BABI
basaltic chondrite best initial | standard for 'primitive' mantle
430
Why doesn't OIB match bulk Earth?
appears to have undergone mixing (subduction) | also not one specific value
431
Elemental differentiation, mantle
solid residue Sm/Nd greater than 1, enriched in Sm Rb/Sr less than 1, depleted in Rb
432
Sialic
relatively light rock rich in silica, alumina typical of outer layers of earth
433
Mechanisms for creating continental crust
1. Accretion of oceanic crust 2. Underplating of magmas 3. Continental volcanics 4. Subduction
434
accretion of oceanic crust
not common, most subducted | add depleted material - melt - granite
435
Underplating of magmas
depleted - remelting - granite
436
Continental volcanics
flood basalts 300Ma later still large flood basalt provinces old provinces may be partitioned by dykes - metamorphosed, melted
437
subduction
accretion of arcs most likely now principal mechanism
438
NA age provinces from
reworking (metamorphism, melting) of crust | addition of new crust
439
Determining age provinces, use
Rb-Sr | new crust should have lower 87Sr/86Sr, younger
440
NA Archaen craton
stable over geologic time scale deep rooted ca. 70km rifted would release massive CO2
441
age provinces in NA
Archaen block in the middle, 2350-2700Ma (Hudsons bay) - less age as you move out in either direction youngest on W coast (less than 440Ma)
442
evolution of continental crust with time
consensus - crust grown at steady rate through geological time - gradual growth growth w/ accretion
443
2 component mixing, proportion present
f_a = A/ (A+B) f_b = B/(A+B) f_a + f_b = 1
444
2 component mixing, end members
if the endmembers are known, then f_a can be calculated for any mixture
445
Two component mixing hyperbola
``` Ratio-Element Plot 87Sr/86Sr vs. Sr, ppm two end members component A, component B Mixture 'M' somewhere in the middle with 2 pts can find the 3rd ```
446
two component mixing hyperbola, Sr_A / Sr_B less than 1
decreasing hyperbola
447
two component mixing hyperbola, Sr_A / Sr_B > 1
increasing hyperbola
448
two component mixing hyperbola, Sr_A / Sr_B = 1
straight line | ONLY if end members are equal
449
linearize it (2 component mixing)
take reciprocal of hyperbola to make it linear | 87Sr/86Sr vs 1/Sr ppm^-1
450
binary mixing
2 components, 2 isotope ratios two elements - Sr, Nd end members - crust, mantle
451
basalt-granite binary mixing may be from
igneous rocks formed basalt magma assimilated granitic rocks or magma generated by melting of a mixture of granitic and basaltic source rocks
452
HIMU
high mantle uranium high µ high 206Pb µ = 238U/204Pb
453
mantle array
graphical plot of 144Nd:143Nd against 87Sr:86Sr for igneous rocks. Rocks which have been derived from the mantle tend to plot on a straight line; those that show evidence of crustal contamination tend to fall off the line
454
mantle array represents
mixing | and evolution?
455
mantle array, primitive mantle
origin ε_UR(Sr) = 0 ε_CHUR(Nd) = 0
456
mantle array quadrants
I - enriched in Rb, Sm II - depleted in Rb, enriched in Sm III - depleted in Rb, Sm IV - enriched in Rb, depleted in Sm
457
mantle array, typical depleted mantle
quadrant II depleted in Rb, enriched in Sm residual solids
458
mantle array, sedimentary rocks
quadrant IV Rb enriched, Sm depleted much larger range c.w. mantle rocks very old
459
Mantle array mixing line
DM, EMII end members
460
DM
depleted mantle
461
EM
enriched mantle material crust, sedimentary rocks end member contaminates mantle through subduction
462
FOZO
focus zone | emanating point
463
EM and HIMU from
subjected ocean crust and continental crust (OC, CC)
464
Sr isotope signature, Fraser river
runs through terrains of different ages - tributaries carry unique isotope signatures from source land - water signature changes along way old continental signature 'diluted' as younger material is mixed in
465
global runoff average
0.7119 87Sr/86Sr 10 major rivers mixed together lower end member younger/OC and higher [Sr]
466
Ganges, Brahmaputra
himalayas high [Sr] high 87Sr/86Sr very rapid erosion rates
467
Ganges 87Sr/86Sr
0.7257
468
Brahmaputra 87Sr/86Sr
0.7210
469
Himalayan weathering
rapid uplift = rapid erosion 87Sr rich from terrigeneous sediments, orogenic granites downstream carbonate signal dominated by high Sr signal increasing oceans isotopic ratio (slowly)
470
Himalayan drainage basins
large marine limestone, evaporites | low 87Sr/86Sr (0.706 - 0.709)
471
Hydrothermal 87Sr/86Sr isotope signatures
seawater component - 0.70916 | basaltic component - 0.7025
472
effects of orogeny on ocean isotopic signal
convergence - orogeny - relief - erosion of old crust - increased ratio
473
Era when continents moved to current positions
Cenozoic
474
changes in altitude =
changes in weathering/erosion
475
Ocean 87Sr/86Sr, Cenozoic
Increasing over most of duration
476
through the Phanerozoic, Sr isotopes highest during
- times of higher tectonism - greater uplift - greater weathering input
477
Carbonate Sr sources
rivers - large variation hydrothermal inputs - constant seafloor spreading - geologically slow
478
other factors that correspond with carbonate Sr changes
``` climate changes ocean oxidation (kind of) ```
479
cosmic ray
primarily high E H, He nuclei H = proton He = alpha particle
480
incoming cosmic ray particles
89% protons 10% helium 1% electrons (ß-)
481
collision of particles w/ molecules
nuclear spallation
482
nuclear spallation
formation of rare isotopes | radioactive or stable
483
measuring cosmogenic isotopes
AMS | very low in abundance
484
AMS
accelerator mass spectrometer
485
cosmic rays interact with atoms
``` in atmosphere in crust (rarely) ```
486
spallation creates
cosmogenic radionuclides
487
spallation reaction
14N - bombarded by radiation - neutron captured - proton expelled - 14C, Z=6, N = 8 1,0n + 14,7N -- 14,6C + 1,1H 14,7N(n,p)14,6C
488
After formation of cosmogenic radionuclide
eventually reverts back to original state | 14C (6p, 8n) - expel ß- particle - 14N (7p, 7n)
489
Hess
Victor Hess, 1912, balloon flight [ ] of cosmic rays increases w/ altitude measured during solar eclipse
490
why Hess measured cosmic rays during eclipse
nobody agreed with him solar radiation blocked out any radiation measured would be cosmic radiation
491
Cosmic rays at Earth
concentrated at poles ca. 4X greater near poles electromagnetic field (dynamo effect)
492
Dynamo effect
mechanism by which a celestial body or star generates a magnetic field rotating, convecting, and electrically conducting fluid can maintain a magnetic field over astronomical time scales
493
Isotopes formed by action of cosmic rays on air
3H, 10Be, 14C, 26Al, 32Si, 36Cl, 39Ar, 53Mn, 59Ni, 129I
494
cosmogenic nuclides governed by
basic decay equation | N = N_o *e^-λt
495
typical N_o (cosmogenic nuclides)
0 short life little-no background
496
Approaches for using cosmogenic nuclides
Radiometric Dating | Exposure Age
497
Radiometric dating of cosmogenic nuclides
incorporation - isolation -decay
498
Exposure Age of cosmogenic nuclides
``` direct irradiation of Si, O especially quartz (10^6 yrs for saturation) ```
499
3H useful for
tracing water on ca. 100-yr timescales | short-term water movements
500
Unique about oxygen, nitrogen
dipoles absorb majority of cosmogenic energy most abundant atoms in atmosphere
501
10Be
cosmogenically produced nuclide readily absorbed in aerosols - rained out remains in atmos. 1-2 weeks adsorbed onto ocean clays
502
10Be formation
cosmic ray + O/N (atmosphere) | spallation of O, Mg, Si, Fe (crust)
503
production rate of 10Be
10^-2 - 10^3 atoms/cm^2/sec | 0.01 - 0.001
504
10Be half life
T_1/2 = 1.5x10^6 y
505
formation of 26Al, 36Cl
intx cosmic ray + 40Ar (99.6%) | spallation products that reach crust (O, Mg, Si, Fe)
506
26Al decay
26Al - 26Mg, T_1/2 = 7.16 x105 yrs
507
36Cl decay
36Cl -- 36S 00 36Ar; T1/2 = 3.08 x10^5
508
26Al, 36Cl properties
readily absorbed into aerosols - rained out Al immobile (like Be) Cl geochemically mobile useful in hydrologic studies, groundwater aging
509
Be evidence
sediments contribute to composition of arc magma
510
10Be unique because
atmosphere- latitudinally heterogenous due to differences in cosmic ray abundance oceans- more uniform due to short mixing time
511
mixing time of oceans
ca. 800 yrs
512
ocean residence time of Be
ca. 4000 yrs
513
Be mantle uses
short decay time - shouldn't exist in mantle - if does, recently subjected presence of 10Be is a source indicator
514
10Be in Arc Lava
``` OIBs = high 10Be MORB = low 10Be ```
515
why OIBs have high 10Be
mantle contamination from lithosphere subduction
516
10Be sedimentation rate
cosmogenic nuclide production assumed constant | using production history can date sediments, ice cores, etc.
517
how to date using 10Be, constant sedimentation rate
``` 10Be = 10Be_o * e^-λt ln(10Be) = -d/a (λ)*ln(phi/a) d = depth a = constant sed. rate phi = production rate ```
518
10Be dating with non-constant sediment rate
10Be = [ phi(t)/a(t) ] * e^ -λt | or e^ -λ(d/a)
519
combining 10Be
26Al/10Be = (26Al/10Be)_o e^(λ_b - λ_a)t
520
why coming 16Al, 10Be
improve age dating | date quartz w/ different decay constants (?)
521
sedimentary quartz
exposed at surface - develop measurable quantities Al, Be - buried - isolated from cosmic-ray flux - nuclides decay at different rates - ratio reflects burial duration
522
Be-Al also used to date
manganese nodules
523
radiogenic carbon
14C | one of most commonly known, used cosmogenic dating systems
524
why 14C is common known/used
high production rate rapid decay rate (T_1/2 = 5730yrs) key constituent of organic matter, non-organic compounds
525
14C dating method
detection, counting of ß rays | ACTIVITY
526
14C foration
N-->P reaction with 14,7N | or 13,6C(d,p)14,6C - 13C collision w/ deuterium, less common
527
14C decay
14,6C -- 14,7N + ß- + v + Q | Q = 0.156MeV
528
14C method
``` A = A_o e^-λt t(BP) = 1/λ ln(A_o/A) t(BP) = -T_1/2 * log_2(A_o/A) ```
529
why is it difficult to measure cosmogenic 'background'
atomic weapons testing - thermal nuclear weapons BP then, = 1950 can tell pre-post bomb
530
challenges with 14C
variations in local/secular atmospheric production/contents Suess Effect Bomb carbon Isotope Fractionation
531
local variations in 14C
production dependent on neutron flux increases w/ altitude to max 12-15,000 m all ca. 4X greater at polar regions changing sun activity changing intensity of Earths magnetic field
532
Suess Effect
14C A in 1900s 2% lower than 1900s due to 'dead' CO2 from fossil fuel combustion
533
`Bomb carbon
nuclear bomb additions to atmos. incorporated into other pools, ages need correction
534
Isotope fractionation
mass differences btw 14C, 12C ca. 16.7% | 14C enriched/depleted in certain reservoirs
535
shared/transported 14C
system will initially share concentration - dating an organisms C - you are what you eat - ocean obtaining atmospheres signature
536
14C, volcanics
eruptions eject large amount of carbonate into air increased 12C, 13C varies exchange ratio
537
magnitude of cosmic radiation depends on
lang altitude | E's magnetic field strength at given t/place
538
de Vries effect
sun activity + magnetic field = ca. 2% or more change in 14C activity 14C 'spikes' = sun spots
539
14C dating of water masses
led to thermohaline circulation theory
540
Depth vs. 10Be
increasing [ ] moving up in agreement with isotopic enrichment of ocean = deposits of old material (mts)
541
most valuable tracers/technique for water studies
Tritium
542
what is tritium
3,1H
543
3H characteristics
useful for freshwater, oceans T1/2 = 12.43 yrs very low abundance (3x10^16% of H isotopes)
544
radioactive, stable H isotopes
``` radioactive = Tritium, 3 H stable = Protium 1H, Deuterium 2H ```
545
formation of 3H
``` Spallation cosmogenic n,p reaction w/ 14,7N requires fast neutron >4MeV 14,7N + 1,0n --> 3,1H + 12,6C 14,7N(n,p)3,1H ```
546
Tritium decay
3,1T -- 3,2H + e- + bar + Q | Q = 0.0186 MeV (low E)
547
Tritium decay energy
low E beta radiation cannot penetrate human skin, only dangerous if inhaled or ingested
548
cosmogenic production of T
0.5±0.3 atoms 3H /cm^2/sec
549
natural amount of T
2. 65kg in atmosphere | ca. 4kg total
550
T.U.
tritium units | notation for reporting [T]
551
1 T.U. =
1 atom 3H / 10^18 atoms H | = 7.1 dissintegrations 3H / min L of water
552
TU in surface water
10 TU (10^-15)
553
T synthetic production
- nuclear reactors using neutrons | - particle beam accelerators
554
why synthesize T
very low natural abundance - impractical | weapons use
555
T synthesis
1. Neutron activation of Lithium-6 | 2. Neutrons react with 3He in particle beam accelerator
556
T synthesis, 1. 6Li
N smashes Li in 2 exothermic - does not require high E neutrons results in T2 gas (like H2) N - strike Li/Al target - reacts w/ 6Li - produce T 6,3Li + n --> 4,2He + 3,1T
557
T synthesis, 2. particle beam
N bonks a proton off and replaces it N react w/ 3He in particle beam accelerator - produce T, H cascading system - feeds itself - runaway rxn's 3,2H + n -- 3,1T + 1,1H
558
CANDU
Canadian Deuterium Uranium reactor T production in heavy water D captures a neutron, makes deutero-tritiated water
559
CANDU reactions
double substitution D2O + n --- TDO singly substituted DHO + n -- THO
560
how CANDU is special
system bathed in heavy water - buffer = lower production of waste = safer In the even of a system failure - D2O floods chamber quenching nuclear reaction
561
US T production
``` 225kg produced 1955-1988 1996 had decayed to 75kg 2003 production resumed 2011 nominal production, maintain equilib. 2016 max production, recover reserve ```
562
Tritium practical uses
military applications flare light source, emergency lights, exit signs, luminous watch/clock dials fuel for nuclear 'fusion' (experimental)
563
two most common earth science applications of T
dating of relatively recent, short-lived elements | tracing, tracking relatively recent hydrologic/water based processes and events
564
natural T cycle
3H formed in lower stratosphere - remains 1-10yrs - enters troposphere - oxidizes to form HTO - rains out in 5-20days
565
change of natural T abundance
nuclear testing
566
[T] before, after nuclear testing
``` pre-1953 = less than 25T.U. (typically 5) 1964 = more than 2200T.U. (typically 1000) ```
567
post-nuclear testing T geoscience
eliminated use of natural T | pulse-chase type experiment
568
PTBT
Partial Test Ban Treaty - 1964 US, USSR agreement to stop aboveground testing then France started, then PRC
569
HTO 'Pulse-chase' experiment uses
reconstruction of T delivery history by identification/measurement of bomb peak penetration rates of HTO (diffusion, advection, piston velocity)
570
problems with HTO pulse-chase
T decay means signal decreases rapidly w/ t | natural dispersion of H2O makes difficult to ID peak w/ time and distance from source
571
solution to HTO problems
use 3He
572
3He solution
measure simultaneously w/ T ID T peak as the sum of 3H + 3He calculate age from 3H/3He ratio
573
3He
tritiogenic helium also low abundance, 1.4x10^-4 % of He produced mostly by T decay
574
calculating 3H
``` 3H = 3He_o * 3H(e^-λt - 1) 3He/4He = (3He/4He)_o + 3H/4He(e^-λt - 1) ```
575
T tracer, ocean water masses
old H2O = low T young H2O = high Tritium how ocean circulation was discovered (and nobody believed them!) can be measured as loss of parent (T) or gains of daughter (3He)
576
why might 3He be advantageous as the measured species over 3H
not taken up by biological organisms - doesn't react
577
how can you measure water recharge rate
age structure | incursions
578
World Energy use by source
``` oil 37% coal 25% gas 23% nuclear 6% biomass 4% hydro 3% solar 0.5% wind 0.3% geothermal 0.2% ```
579
biggest potential issues with nuclear power
what to do with waste | potential weapon danger
580
change in energy sources
relatively static over the last 30 years
581
majority of nuclear reactors
E NA France SW Asia
582
Canada nuclear power
19 reactors, Ontario 16% of Electricity only half of power generated is used in Canada used to be world leader - 22% of world output overtaken by Kazakhstan, 2009
583
Inequality of nuclear power
non-renewable U not available in every country would result in same political battles as fossil fuels
584
Uranium production in Canada
production from worlds largest McArthur River mine, N SK expected to increase from 2013, new mine mostly in WCSB
585
WCSB
western canadian sedimentary basin | concentrated U deposits
586
why is U concentrated in WCSB
U deposited in lithos. - rain - leeching - U oxide is soluble (unique) - transports w/ water - concentrates - reduced - drop out
587
Nuclear fueld cycle
``` mining and milling -- U concentrate convert concentrate into UO2 or UF6 enrichment fuel fabrication electricity generation optional chemical reprocessing disposal - recovered or permanently stored ```
588
mining and milling of uranium
produce concentrated uranium = yellowcake
589
why does U have to be concentrated in to yellowcake
mined U not directly useable for power
590
UO2
uranium dioxide | used in heavy water reactors
591
UF6
uranium hexafluoride | light water reactors
592
Nuclear fuel cycle, enrichment
increases proportion of 235U
593
why increase proportion of 235U
rare, fissile
594
fuel fabrication of U
manufactured in to fuel pellets
595
typical U pellet
ca. 7g | E = 3.5 oil barrels, 17,000 ft^3 natural gas, 1,780 lbs coal
596
Uranium fuel manufacturing
``` last stage before use in reactor compress UO2 powder into cylinder bake at 1700ºC - hard ceramic pellet stack pellets in to thin tubes - fuel rods group into bundle - fuel assembly ```
597
typical pressurized water reactor
193 fuel assemblies 51,000 fuel rods 18 fuel pellets ca 5yrs
598
fissionable
material can undergo nuclear fission typically ß decay mostly actinides
599
fissile
able to sustain a chain reaction w/ low E neutrons
600
fissile isotopes
235U 233U 239Pu 241Pu
601
Fissionable chain reaction
only sustainable w/ fast neutron | unless fissile
602
Fissile rule
Heavy isotopes 1. Z between 90 - 100 (actinides) 2. 2Z - N = 43 +/- 2
603
fertile
not fissile but easily upgraded to fissile
604
fertile U
238
605
fissionable process
unstable mix of Z/N slow, low E N hits - low E fast, high energy N, (cosmic ray, spallation) - massive destruction - perpetuate reaction
606
Oklo, Gabon
U deposit behaved as natural nuclear fission reactor ca. 1.8Ga few 100,000 yrs 100kW power output average
607
Canadas nuclear power program 2016
5 plants, 3 provinces, 19 active power reactors, mostly ontario, all CANDU design, ca. 16.5% of E Bruce Nuclear Generating Station, Ont Pickering NGS, Ont Darlington NGS, Ont Gentilly-2 Nuclear Facility, Quebec (shut down) Point Lepreau GS, NB
608
Nuclear waste
biggest problem is intermediates - nonactinide radionuclides short decay times, T_1/2 =50 yrs = high E = gamma radiation
609
interim nuclear waste storage
removed radioactively, thermally hot for several yrs rods in barrels in H2O to cool the moved to longer term storage
610
Canada interim storage
on land - dry storage
611
long term disposal plans
``` drop from ship into sediment (would leech out of container) vitrify store in Yucca mt in an open system reprocess breeder reactors ```
612
Th power
3-4X more abundance than U (in crust) not fissile but fertile 232Th - 233U is more efficient than 238U - 239Pu does not require isotopic separation minimal radioactive waste anti-theft abundant in ocean - available to more nations