319 Marine Ecology Flashcards
Ecology is the study of
- interactions between organisms
- interactions btw organisms and their environments
- how interactions affect distribution and abundance of organisms
Scales of ecology
Individuals/ population/ community structure
Ecosystem structure
Global biogeographic patterns
aspects of individual/ population/ community structure
species composition
species ranges
organism dispersion
aspects of ecosystem structure
food webs
energy flows
How environment affects ecosystem
aspects of global biogeographic patterns
Distribution patterns
Biodiversity patterns
Baseline data for climate models
the basis of marine ecology
observations observations observations
scientific deduction
use logic to build on a premise, generate a hypothesis, and make a prediction
Question:
broad interrogative sentence about a specific ecological phenomenon
Eg. why do mussel densities vary
Premise:
Our best ecological knowledge about the phenomenon
Eg. seastars eat mussels
Hypothesis:
A testable, mechanistic, assumption about the ecological phenomenon in question, based on sound premies.
Eg. Because seastars eat mussels, there will be fewer mussels where there are seastars
Prediction
How two variables relate to each other b/c of the mechanism described in the hypothesis
eg. seastar, mussel density will be negatively correlated; mussel density will increase when you remove seastars
A statistical test tells you
if differences btw controls and treatments are significantly different, i.e. not likely to be due to chance
Intertidal old definition
areas of the shore are covered by water during high tide, and uncovered during low tide
Intertidal new definition
where land meets the sea
the interface between terrestrial and marine ecosystems
why old intertidal definition is not as good
-some shore ecosystems don’t experience big tidal changes (high/low tides) but still have characteristic features
shore ecosystem organisms
up to 10 phyla (30 in the sea)
seaweeds, bivalves, gastropods
close relationship with some terrestrial organisms (gulls, raccoons, bears)
Environmental variables in the shore
- sediment size
- water emersion and submersion
- wave exposure
Sediment size
diameter at widest part of sediment grain
based on Wentworth scale of sediment size
boulders - clay grains
grain sizes, Wentworth scale
boulders >246mm cobbles 66-246 pebbles 4-64 granules 2-4 (gravel >2) coarse sand 0.5-2 medium sand 0.25-0.5 fine sand 0.06-0.25 silt 0.004-0.06 clay - less than 0.004
dominant type of organisms in rocky intertidal
epifauna, largely sessile
eg. barnacles, mussels
types of organisms based on sediment
epifauna (rocky environment)
infauna (sandy/muddy envt)
semi-infauna
semi-infauna example
sea pen - deeply rooted stalk, protrude above sediment
common in deep sea
sediment size determines
epifauna or infauna or no fauna
middle sizes not suitable for attachment or burrowing (cobbles)
biodiversity vs sediment size
negative parabola
high diversity/richness at small and large sed size
tides are
periodic movement of water across shore ecosystem caused by the gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun
tidal range
difference between low and high tide
chart datum
reference for measuring the tide, typically the lowest possible low tide (then tides are measured as height above CD)
what creates tides
rotation of moon = bulge on either side of earth – earth rotates through both bulges in one day, 2 bulges = 2 high tides
earths rotation
counterclockwise
W –> E
types of tides
diurnal
semidiurnal
mixed semidiurnal
diurnal
1 high tide, 1 low tide in a 24 hour cycle
majority of the worlds tides
90% are semidiurnal or mixed semidiurnal
VI tides
mixed semidiurnal
tide shift
0.75 hours/day (due to the moon rotating and moving the bulges)
what causes spring/neap tide cycles
earth/ sun/ moon alignment
moon has larger affect on tides but when M+S align = additive affects = spring tide
when M+S 90º apart, cancel each other out = neap tide
semidiurnal
2 high tides approximately same height; 2 low tides in a 24hr cycle,
high tide
area of Earth covered by bulge
spring tide
sun, moon, earth aligned on same side (new moon), or opposite side (full moon)
highest high tide
lowest low tide
locational effects on tidal variation
latitude
topography
local currents
coriolis force
latitude effect on tides
poles and tropics have lower tidal ranges than the mid latitudes
distance effect on tides
distance between E, M, S changes as they pass through their elliptical orbits
tides are measured relative
to a reference
eg. lowest neap tide, average tide
measuring tidal heights relative to mean
Height above chart datum (m) vs Time (h) Extreme high water of spring tide EHWS Mean high water of spring tides MHWS mean high water neap tide MHWN mean tide level MTL mean low water neap tide MLWN mean low water spring tide MLWS extreme low water spring ELWS
tide created gradient
ecocline
environmental wetness–dryness gradient
variable based on waves
low tide
area of Earth away from bulge
one tidal cycle
24 hours, 50 minutes
emersion
the process or state of emerging from or being out of water after being submerged; being uncovered during the low tide
neap tide
sun and moon perpendicular to each other
lowest high tide
highest low tide
least difference between high and low tide
submersion
Being underwater or going underwater; being covered in water during high tide
awash
being washed in seawater as it ebbs or flows during the tide; level with the surface of water, especially the sea, so that it just washes over
exposure
affected by waves
**NOT exposed to air, do not use ‘exposed’ when talking about emersion
problems associated with emersion-submersion cycles
temperature fluxes
desiccation
oxygen concentrations
currents that cause unattached items to move
Intertidal is defined by
wet –> dry gradient
tides may move the gradient up/down
why is O2 a problem in emersion-submersion cycles
many intertidal organisms deal with T fluxes and desiccation in a way that limits their oxygen
eg. shellfish close their shells
seawater and T fluctuations
T fluctuation milder in water – water has high heat capacity due to H bonds (require high E to break)
Intertidal T fluctuations
day vs night
seasonal cycles
latitudinal gradients
intertidal seasonal temperature fluctuations
- can be extreme
- timing of low/high tide varies across seasons (eg. right now low tide is night time)
poikilotherm
organism whose internal temperature varies considerably
Q_10 rule
Q_10 = 2 - 3
metabolic rate doubles or triples with every 10ºC increase in temperature
enzyme activity vs temperature
increasing parabola
medium T = optimal T for enzyme activity
optimal T varies between and even within species (different enzymes have diff. optimal T)
what happens to enzyme activity above optimal T
activity decreases because enzymes start to degrade / denature at high T’s
problem with higher metabolic rate
more E required to maintain basic metabolic function = less E for growth = lower “scope for growth”
scope for growth and temperature
decreases with increasing T b/c animal is spending all E surviving in high T
startegies for dealing with T fluctuations
behaviour
physiological/ biochemical
adaptation
behavioural strategies for dealing with T fluctuations
short-term behaviour changes to maintain internal T
physiological/ biochemical strategies for dealing with T fluctuations
short-term physiological responses
ex. produce heat-shock proteins or antifreeze molecules
adaptations for dealing with T fluctuations
morphological or physiological feature that evolve to minimize T fluctuation
-generational timescales
examples of behavioural T control strategies
hide in crevices
bivalves close shells
gastropods clamp down on the surface
form beds to trap moisture and buffer against T
shell adaptation to T fluctuations
light colour shells - reflect more sun
ridged shell - dissipate heat, trap moisture
snail study, Australia
find high-shore light-coloured snails stay cooler than exposed rock possibly due to shell colour
LD_50
temperature at which 50% cumulative mortality occurs
T tolerance, T optima vary based on
species
geographic range
enzyme activity at the T extremes
low T = enzyme activity too low to sustain life
high T = physiological failure due to protein damage
why are low T’s bad for enzyme activity
risk of tissue freezing
metabolic rate is too low– energy limited, growth / reproduction reduced
“supra-optimal”
above optimal temperature
at “supra-optimal” T’s
enzymes fail
protein denaturation
scope of growth reduced
capacity to produce heat shock proteins
appears to be threshold-responsive
may differ between regions (study found HS proteins in subtropic species)
heat shock protein, high T
at high enough T even the proteins fail
why would an organism have a higher LD_50
better able to deal with extreme heat
antifreeze proteins
glycoproteins
not nearly as well studied
found in polar regions
why are heat-shock / glyco proteins only short-term solutions
difficult to maintain
energetically demanding to produce
hierarchical T response
short term - physiological change
medium term - acclimation
long term - evolution and adaptation
may be additive, combined
why is desiccation a problem
marine organisms are mostly water;
can’t perform physiologic fn’s if dried up;
O2 availability problems
intertidal oxygen availability problems
can’t breathe ‘air’
breathing organs collapse when dry
strategies to conserve H2O deplete O2
strategies that minimize desiccation
a lot of the strategies that manage T clamp down close shell occur in beds aggregate in shaded crevices/ tide pools
overcoming desiccation
some organisms can rehydrate
intertidal seaweeds can lose 70-90% of internal moisture (probably specialized protein, not well understood)
strategies to maintain oxygen levels
specialized gills
specialized respiration
quiescent (inactive)
intertidal organisms, specialized gills
gills enclosed in thin-walled cavity to prevent drying (bivalves, crabs)
reduced gill size, vascularized mantle cavity = lung for aerial respiration (barnacles, high tide gastropods)
intertidal organisms, cutaneous respiration
reduced gill size, proliferation of blood vessels in skin
eg. intertidal fish
quiescence
inactivity reduces oxygen needs
strategies for dealing with wave action
aggregate in sheltered location
anchor to substrate
reduce profile
flexibility and elasticity
how intertidal organisms anchor to substrate
permanently - holdfast, abyssal thread, ‘glue’
temporarily - muscular goot, mucus-glue
intertidal organism shelter
crevices, tide pools, burrowing (if possible…)
dealing with wave action in the intertidal, reducing profile
small, squat, streamlined body - temporarily or permanent;
decrease physical damage, detachment
intertidal animals with permanently low profile
crustose algae barnacles limpets chitons abalone
intertidal animals with variable profile
anemone
crab
exhibit behavioural plasticity
why do intertidal organisms want to be flattened
reduce drage
dont ‘feel’ current as much
reduce dislodging
example of intertidal organisms exhibiting flexibility to deal with wave action
kelp - bend back and forth with the currents
wave action can have significant effects on community composition by
affecting sediment distribution
creating disturbance —> community succession
ecological niche
sum of organisms biotic + abiotic environment uses
eg. space, good, temperature range
not the same as habitat
most important determinant of where an organism can live in the shore environment
sediment size
rocky shore communities
diverse phyla, epifauna, many sessile, distinct donation patterns, primary and secondary space occupants
competition
an interaction btw individuals in which each is harmed by their shared use of a resource that limits their growth, survival, or reproduction
competition between individual of the same species
intraspecific competition
competition happens when
individuals of same species or diff species use same limiting resource
what is the relative importance of intraspecific competition vs interspecific competition
competition between species is relatively more important
types of competition
exploitative
interference competition
pre-emptive competition
exploitative competition
indirect competition
eg. plants depleting nutrients to the detriment of others
interference competition
two competitors physically interfere with each other
pre-emptive competition
get there first
rocky shore organisms display this competition by settling first
when is competition especially intense
when shared resource is rare / limiting
competition increases for
species and resource similarity
interspecific competition
competition between individuals of different species
most important resources that organisms compete for in marine environments
food
space
epi-fauna’s major requirement
space - surface to attach to
space is limiting
Connell’s barnacle experiment
Chthamalus stellatus vs Balanus balanoides
why did the two barnacles show zonation
Chthamalus stellatus
small barnacle, up to 8mm diameter
brown-greyish, smooth with oval operculum
Balanus balanoides
large barnacle, up to 22mm diameter
whitish in colour, white diamond-shaped operculum, deeply ridged plates, lower desiccation tolerance due to size
barnacle life cycle
nauplii I – nauplii II – nauplii III — nauplii iV – nauplii V — Nauplii VI – cyprid stage – settlement – metamorphosis – sessile adult
Connell’s observations
barnacle adults found in distinct bands
barnacle larvae found all over the intertidal (not in bands)
very narrow overlap zone - stark transition
zonation Connell’s barnacles show
Chthamalus found in upper tidal, away from water = more emersion time
Balanus found in lower intertidal, close to water = more submersion time
Connell’s question
why isn’t Chthamalus found in lower intertidal
Connell’s hypotheses
- space competition by Balanus limits Chthamalus in lower intertidal
- Chthamalus limited by submersion tolerance (not very good hypothesis)
- other possible reasons: predators, intraspecific competition
Connell’s experiments
- remove/ exclude Baluns from patches at different tide levels to see what happens to Cthamalus
- transplanted rocks w/ Cth. from upper–> lower to see if they survive
- also tested intraspecific competition and predators
how did Connell know that Balanus could not survive in the higher intertidal
he transplanted them from low –> high in a previous experiment
Connell’s results
- removal of Balanus from overlap increased Chth survival
- transplanting Chth lower had no effect on survival unless Balanus was also removed
Summary of Connell’s experiment
donation created by competition + tolerance
when env’t conditions stressful, community composition dominated by species that can survive there
what would be the outcome of Chthamalus/Balanus competition in a hot beach
at very high T Balanus may not survive due to its low desiccation tolerance, then Chth would dominate and take over low intertidal; Chth wins and zonation moves lower or doesn’t exist at all
what do Connell’s experiments demonstrate
- competition can structure the rocky shore community
- physical/bio conditions can alter the outcome of the competition
what does it mean that physical and biological conditions can alter the outcomes of competition
Context Specific!
eg. desiccation modified the outcome of barnacle competition
fundamental niche
set of resources where organism can theoretically survive
Chthamalus fundamental niche
all over intertidal
Balanus fundamental niche
only lower intertidal due to low desiccation tolerance
what would be the outcome of Chthamalus/Balanus competition at a moderate temperature beach
Balanus will outcompete Chth for cooler areas - crevices, low tide zone; baluns wins, Connell-type zonation
realized niche
the resources that the organism actually uses; may or may not be similar to fundamental niche
Chthamalus realized niche
≠ fundamental niche
able to utilize entire intertidal but not ‘allowed’ to b/c of Balanus
Balanus realized niche
= fundamental niche
Why does Balanus’ realized niche = fundamental niche but Chthamalus’ does not
Balanus is a superior competitor - dominant
how do animals co-exist in limiting habitats
competitive exclusion principle
what is the competitive exclusion principle
- competitors more likely to co-exist if they use resources in a different way
- competitors exclude each other when they use resources in exactly the same way
what would be the outcome of Chthamalus/Balanus competition at a cool beach
Balanus can tolerate being farther from water; Balanus wins, zonation moves higher or none at all if Balanus takes over
why can’t Balanus and Chthamalus co-exist
they use resources (space) the same way
when species use resources in the same they have the same
ecological niche
when a limiting resource is used in different ways it is called
resource partitioning
resource partitioning allows
multiple species to co-exist
types of predators in the rocky intertidal
borers, drillers, crushers, crackers, external digesters, browsers, sit and wait, mobile
types of grazers in rocky intertidal
sweepers, rakers
population
group of individuals of the same species that share a habitat and experience similar environmental conditions
population size
number/ biomass of individuals in a population (units = individuals, grams, etc. )
population density
number/biomass of individuals of a population in a given area (individuals / m2)
consumer effect on prey
depress density of prey by consuming them
profitability
energy per unit time an individual is aquiring
optimal foraging theory
profitability vs. prey size
profitability is highest at intermediate prey size
predators impact is largest on the size of prey that is most profitable (optimal)
why is profitability low for small and large prey sizes
too big = hard to capture/ crush/ kill
too small = too low of nutritional value for the work it takes
percent of prey population vs sizes
generally majority of population is small, less medium, big, less biggest
what happens to percent of prey population vs size when you add a predator
the population will go down but mostly only the medium sized individuals
why might optimal foraging theory exist
reproduction is also scaled to size – leaving large prey = more reproductive abilities = more prey
why are humans unnatural predators
we draw down the biggest prey
functional response curves
prey eaten per predator vs prey density
Type I = linear response, no restriction to how much predator eats
Type II = saturating curve, at some point predator can not keep up to prey
Type III = S-shape, predator must learn how to consume new prey source
most common type of functional response curve
Type II - saturating
when a consumer has an indirect effect on prey traits
inducible defense
barnacle inducible defense
Chthamalus in presence of Acanthina predator - bent form where operculum is ‘hidden’ from predator
If bent barnacles are protected from predators why don’t they all grow this way
bent barnacles of the same age have smaller shells and reproduce less; bent form may protect against predators but decreases population size and health
predator-induced changes, green crab and herbivorous snail
green crab – risk cue– suppress snail grazing – impact on algal community
predator risk impacts the ecosystem
consumer effects
consumptive or non-consumptive biomass abundance characteristics diversity
example of indirect effects
crab indirectly impacts algae via snail
sea otter indirectly impacts kelp via urchins
oystercatcher observations
- algal cover low where limpets are abundant
- limpets not found in oystercatcher feeding areas
- algal cover is high where oystercatchers feed
oystercatcher hypothesis
oystercatchers induce a trophic cascade by suppressing limpets which feed on algae
oystercatcher exclusion experiment
w/ cages exclude limpets
algae much higher in treatment than control
oystercatcher natural experiment
observe beaches where there are and aren’t oystercatchers
at beaches w/ oystercatchers limpets did not utilize full fundamental niche
human-oystercatcher observation
site w/ human activity have less oystercatchers and less algae
human-oystercatcher hypothesis
- human-educed trophic cascade = human affected sites have less oystercatchers – more limpets – less algae
- may be why human frequented beaches have so many limpets
trophic cascade
predator suppressed abundance or alters behavior of prey, releasing the next lower trophic level from predation
inducible defences can impact the community
predator induces bent form of barnacle – bent form not edible to predator – predator preys on mussel – mussel pop decreased – algae population increases due to freed up space
types of trophic cascades in rocky shore
density-mediated trophic cascade
trait-mediated trophic cascade
cost of inducible defense
lower growth
lower reproductive capacity
less fitness
density-mediated trophic cascade
caused by consumptive, lethal effects of predator on prey
trait-mediated trophic cascade
caused by non-consumptive, non-lethal effects of predator on prey
Enteromorpha
sea lettuce, Ulva
Littorina observations
- Littorina snail prefers feeding on soft algae, Ulva
- Littorina avoids feeding on tough algae, Chondrus
Littorina reverse transplant experiment
choose tide pools (some w/ some w/o snail) – remove snails from pools that had – add snails to pools that didn’t have – compare
Littorina results
control (w/ Littorina): chondrus dominant
snail introduced pool: originally dominated by Ulva, decreases in time, eventually replaced by Chondrus
snail removed: chondrus drops and Ulva rapidly becomes dominant
what does Littorina study tell us
even grazers can have large impacts on community and environment
competitive-dominant
out-compete other species for resources
mussels
Ulva